i mention my need, and i mention the product, as far as i can see it meet my need, do you share the same opinion as me ??
Posts
- 
RE: WD My Cloud EX4posted in IT Discussion
 - 
RE: WD My Cloud EX4posted in IT Discussion
i'm planning to buy the one with 4 HD, 3 TB each, in this case i will get 6 TB with RAID 10 which is enough for me
 - 
RE: My Server Crash Writeup 11-10-2015posted in IT Discussion
now i understand you, thank you
and sorry for my poor english, sometimes i want to make sure whether i understand your idea or not, for this reason i ask a question after an answer
 - 
dell poweredge T310 stop at boot (Memory error)posted in IT Discussion
hi everybody
i think i made the worst mistake ever, i was cleaning the server from dust and unplug the RAID controller, after that the system cannot boot and show this message :

i think after removing the RAID controller, the motherboard lost the boot configuration (one technician told me this)
i'm in a shit now

 - 
RE: dell poweredge T310 stop at boot (Memory error)posted in IT Discussion
after the inspection, they told us that the RAID controller is faulty and need to be replaced

 - 
RE: dell poweredge T310 stop at boot (Memory error)posted in IT Discussion
@Dashrender said:
you can't connect your old drives and expect them to work as they did before. The RAID controller is what knows how to make the drives work with each other to get your data off, depending on what RAID level you were using.
i'm planning to format it, i mean install a fresh windows server
 - 
windows server 2008 R2 SP1 license (physical VS virtual)posted in IT Discussion
Hi everybody,
i want to know is there any difference btw the price of the license for physical machine or virtual machine, we have 2 physical server DELL Poweredge T310, i want to take one of them and host in it 2 VM, so now i'm wondering if the license for a VM is cheaper than the one for physical machine
thanks
 - 
RE: windows server 2008 R2 SP1 license (physical VS virtual)posted in IT Discussion
@scottalanmiller said:
@IT-ADMIN said:
thanks for the link, but i think it is not accurate because they didn't mention server 2008 as compatible OS whereas i'm using it
That you are using it does not imply that it is fully compatible or supported.
i see your point
 - 
RE: windows server 2008 R2 SP1 license (physical VS virtual)posted in IT Discussion
@JaredBusch said:
We already know the the place where @IT-ADMIN is does not actually care about licensing.
finally after i show the advantage of virtualization to the management especially after that hardware issue i had few days ago, i finally convince them to buy 2 windows server licenses because i told them that for this project to be successful it is a must we have windows server licences and they agreed
 - 
RE: windows server 2008 R2 SP1 license (physical VS virtual)posted in IT Discussion
when we had that hardware failure we experienced one day and a half of downtime, i explained to the management if we had virtualization in place we would not have this difficult time, instead we will export the VM to another hipervisor without any issue, and they were pleased with the idea

 - 
RE: windows server 2008 R2 SP1 license (physical VS virtual)posted in IT Discussion
@LAH3385 said:
LOL!!! You are in exact same boat as me! But it took me 2 whole months to persuade them to go VMs. Nice job on that!.
There's a lot of thread on how to go visualization and different between each hypervisor.As SAM has mentioned before in other thread Do you homework before purchasing hardware! Don't make the same mistake I did.
yes off course now that i have the budget i will learn what is the optimal way to go before doing anything
 - 
RE: windows server 2008 R2 SP1 license (physical VS virtual)posted in IT Discussion
i learn something is that the best time to ask for a budget is the time of disaster,
because while everything is runing fine, you will not take easily a budget from the management - 
Cannot Control My Desktop from Center Kasperskyposted in IT Discussion
Hi everybody
i have 2 volume licence of (25 desktop and 3 File Servers) & (15 desktop and 2 File Servers), recently i learn that you can manage your desktop and servers by using https://center.kaspersky.com, off course after registering your machines with your email so that you can manage them from a central location which is great, till now i can see the licenses status of all my machines but the problem is i cannot manage them, for example if i disable a feature in the center.kaspersky.com it will not be applied on the machine, so is there any setting i have to do to let the center.kasprsky.com manage my machines ??
for example when i disable the firewall, the button keep showing progress without any action as shown on the following image

then it says : Could not send the command. Please try again later.

thank you very much
 - 
RE: Cannot Control My Desktop from Center Kasperskyposted in IT Discussion
we had 2 year license, and only about 3 months remaining now,
the thing is i want to know whether managing my workstations from a central machine is possible or not before renewing the licenses,
the KSOS 3 was great and it offer this feature, the new version KSOS 4 has a web kaspersky center which is a very bad idea - 
what are the best practices to do before virtualizing a physical DC ?posted in IT Discussion
Hi everybody...
what are the best practices to do before virtualizing a physical DC (windows server 2008 R2 SP1)
i read this article : http://www.serverwatch.com/server-tutorials/virtualizing-active-directory-domain-controllers-general-best-practices.html
are those recommendations are correct ??
thank you very much
 - 
RE: Cannot Control My Desktop from Center Kasperskyposted in IT Discussion
i found the solution

the solution is to downgrade to KSOS 3
what a bad software :(, old version are better than the new ones - 
pay attention to kaspersky, very very bad tech supportposted in IT Discussion
the image will explain everything, nobody answer the client ticket, it looks like there is no technical support at all

 - 
RE: LAN speedposted in IT Discussion
ok thank you guys, i think 200Mbs is ok now, better than 44Mbs

 

