@Dashrender said:
As Scott mentioned some companies don't like to pay a nickle for time they don't see spent in person
Well, that's unfortunate. I used to be a consultant, so maybe I'm better at seeing things from both perspectives.
Often it is more productive for consultants to work on our stuff remotely, and I always encourage this. One of our consultants lives in India, so on-site work isn't an option. Working remotely gives them so much more flexibility. Others feel they can work better on-site because they don't have any distractions. It depends on the job to a degree. The main downside of remote working is probably that you don't get to chat and pick the brains of the consultants whilst they work.
With remoting, I suppose you also have to trust the consultants to charge you a fair rate based on the amount of actual work involved. But this is no different to letting employees work from home. I work hard on building good relations with a select group of consultants. There are times when they've quoted for an 8 hour job and it has taken 12 hours and they don't charge me anything extra. So if an 8 hour job only turns out to take 4 hours I'm delighted - it means the job went particularly well. I would never expect a refund or anything. Some times I'll get an on-site consultant to finish early in order to beat the rush hour traffic and then he'll log on from home and finish off the job. It's a win-win.
But generally I find the idea of a consultant getting in a car and driving 2 hours to my office through heavy traffic just to do an installation that he could do just as well sitting in his pyjamas at home is just insane. Then when they're waiting for a 2 hour download they could be walking their dog or playing with their kids instead of sitting in my office drinking my tea. That's what pisses me off. It is just so inefficient.