ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Reconsidering ProxMox

    IT Discussion
    kvm lxc proxmox
    32
    241
    33.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • black3dynamiteB
      black3dynamite
      last edited by

      Proxmox full backup is not bad when your lxc containers is small.
      ce059a65-b1dc-4e4d-b46b-d4caa00ed4b3-image.png

      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @black3dynamite
        last edited by

        @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

        black3dynamiteB stacksofplatesS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • black3dynamiteB
          black3dynamite @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

          @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

          I don't know since I don't use a lot of containers.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stacksofplatesS
            stacksofplates @DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

            @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

            Who has that? What's a use case for massive containers?

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
              last edited by

              @stacksofplates said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

              @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

              @black3dynamite What if you have massive containers though?

              Who has that? What's a use case for massive containers?

              We do, for example. Not often, but when we need storage, containers are still better than a full VM if you don't need the extra overhead.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • warren.stanleyW
                warren.stanley
                last edited by

                After adjusting the updates to the pve-no-subscription repo and updating (full-upgrade), I had an issue where no templates for Containers were available on the host, to "Download" (under pve -> local (pve) -> "Content" -> "Templates").

                Apparently the list of available templates is updated daily through the "pve-daily-update timer".

                I triggered and update manually (cause i'm impatient) via:

                root@pve:~# pveam update
                

                ...you can then check the list via:

                root@pve:~# pveam available
                

                And then I had templates to use under pve -> local (pve) -> "Content" -> "Templates".

                Just spinning up a Debian 10 CT and VM now.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • mroth911M
                  mroth911
                  last edited by

                  PROXMOX with LIZARD FS? ANYONE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED IT.

                  stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stacksofplatesS
                    stacksofplates @mroth911
                    last edited by stacksofplates

                    @mroth911 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                    PROXMOX with LIZARD FS? ANYONE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED IT.

                    I have not (but haven't tried). It doesn't appear to be a supported thing from ProxMox. They don't reference it anywhere, only LizardFS does. It's all CLI driven it looks like. Doesn't look like you get any GUI control like with Ceph.

                    LizardFS mentions in their documentation that they run the chunk server on the ProxMox nodes in functional testing, developemnt, and "some private setups" using LXC containers as the chunk server. So it doesn't sound like it's a recommended thing to do. I'm not sure in the other setup whether they have the chunk servers as completely separate physical machines or if it's a VM with QoS for the disks or something else. Not much out there on it.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                      coliverC B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • CloudKnightC
                        CloudKnight
                        last edited by

                        I'm quite happy with it as well, I've deployed a couple of production servers using proxmox and all good so far as well

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                          We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                          Are you deploying multi-node setups or just single nodes?

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @coliver
                            last edited by

                            @coliver said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                            We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                            Are you deploying multi-node setups or just single nodes?

                            Single node. It's a rare customer that would need more than one node.

                            coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • coliverC
                              coliver @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                              @coliver said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                              We've been deploying more and more Proxmox and so far, knock on wood, we are remaining happy.

                              Are you deploying multi-node setups or just single nodes?

                              Single node. It's a rare customer that would need more than one node.

                              Got it.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • travisdh1T
                                travisdh1 @black3dynamite
                                last edited by

                                @black3dynamite said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                To get rid of the no subscription message pop up
                                5c7671bd-a9e1-482a-ad22-830513c43fe7-image.png

                                https://johnscs.com/remove-proxmox51-subscription-notice/

                                sed -i.bak "s/data.status !== 'Active'/false/g" /usr/share/javascript/proxmox-widget-toolkit/proxmoxlib.js && systemctl restart pveproxy.service
                                

                                Clear your browser cache.

                                Just did this today, still working. TYVM

                                black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • black3dynamiteB
                                  black3dynamite @travisdh1
                                  last edited by

                                  @travisdh1 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                  @black3dynamite said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                  To get rid of the no subscription message pop up
                                  5c7671bd-a9e1-482a-ad22-830513c43fe7-image.png

                                  https://johnscs.com/remove-proxmox51-subscription-notice/

                                  sed -i.bak "s/data.status !== 'Active'/false/g" /usr/share/javascript/proxmox-widget-toolkit/proxmoxlib.js && systemctl restart pveproxy.service
                                  

                                  Clear your browser cache.

                                  Just did this today, still working. TYVM

                                  This will make the changes after an update/upgrade.
                                  https://github.com/foundObjects/pve-nag-buster

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • B
                                    biggen @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by biggen

                                    @scottalanmiller What’s your storage configuration like?

                                    I’ve been playing with it on ZFS Raid 1 mirror. Proxmox OS and VMs all on same mirror. Performance is “OK”. Not as good as MD with same setup though.

                                    Wonder if it’s better to create separate Raid 1 ZFS pools. One for the Proxmox OS and one for the VMs.

                                    V scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • V
                                      VoIP_n00b @biggen
                                      last edited by

                                      @biggen said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                      @scottalanmiller What’s your storage configuration like?

                                      I’ve been playing with it on ZFS Raid 1 mirror. Proxmox OS and VMs all on same mirror. Performance is “OK”. Not as good as MD with same setup though.

                                      Wonder if it’s better to create separate Raid 1 ZFS pools. One for the Proxmox OS and one for the VMs.

                                      Did you configure ZFS correctly? https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/ZFS_on_Linux#_limit_zfs_memory_usage What drives are you using?

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                      • B
                                        biggen @VoIP_n00b
                                        last edited by

                                        @VoIP_n00b Its a lab for testing so no Enterprise drives. Just a pair of Samsung 970 Pros.

                                        Box only has 32GB of RAM so that would mean that ZFS on Proxmox would be using at most 16GB of RAM for the ARC by default. Seems like ZFS needs a ton of RAM.

                                        V scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • V
                                          VoIP_n00b @biggen
                                          last edited by

                                          @biggen said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                          Seems like ZFS needs a ton of RAM.

                                          You have to configure it 😉

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                          • B
                                            biggen @VoIP_n00b
                                            last edited by

                                            @VoIP_n00b I'll read over your link. I admit I haven't messed with it a ton. Kinda assumed it would work "out of the box" but looks like I need to tinker.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 7 / 13
                                            • First post
                                              Last post