ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing

    IT Discussion
    licensing open source
    5
    16
    1.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • coliverC
      coliver
      last edited by

      AGPLv3 forces the software to be released with the same license. MIT doesn't. I think that's the big take away.

      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @coliver
        last edited by

        @coliver do you think there would be any reason for these scripts to not have the strongest license?

        This way anything that comes down the pipe is available to everyone from the get-go.

        scottalanmillerS coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @dustinb3403 said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

          @coliver do you think there would be any reason for these scripts to not have the strongest license?

          This way anything that comes down the pipe is available to everyone from the get-go.

          AGPLv3 forces everyone to contribute back. MIT does not. Probably doesn't matter for this kind of thing.

          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • coliverC
            coliver @DustinB3403
            last edited by coliver

            @dustinb3403 said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

            @coliver do you think there would be any reason for these scripts to not have the strongest license?

            This way anything that comes down the pipe is available to everyone from the get-go.

            I am partial to the AGPL license just because it forces everything that uses it to maintain the same license and any modifications need to be shared back to the community, if it is released. (I don't do software dev just thinking from a enthusiasts point of view).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller that was kind of my thinking that the contributions back to the primary would be best this way you have one system that just works for everybody and you don't have to worry about disparaging differences between 1 fork or another

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @dustinb3403 said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                @scottalanmiller that was kind of my thinking that the contributions back to the primary would be best this way you have one system that just works for everybody and you don't have to worry about disparaging differences between 1 fork or another

                As people don't host it, though, likely doesn't matter.

                DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller So you think AGPLv3 is fine?

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    Let's take a poll

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      Poll closed, GPL'd both.

                      Calling on @olivier to license https://github.com/vatesfr/xo

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        @dustinb3403 said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                        @scottalanmiller So you think AGPLv3 is fine?

                        yeah, don't think that it would make any difference as there is no hosted version of the code, so what would it affect?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierO
                          olivier
                          last edited by olivier

                          aGPLv3 if you think some "hosters" can use it without contributing (ie not actually run the code on your machine = no need to share your modification with GPLv2 for example).

                          Guess which license made AWS adding stuff to Xen without sharing it? So, even if I'm selling software, I'm convinced aGPLv3 is more fair toward the community. /my2cents

                          coliverC R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @olivier
                            last edited by coliver

                            @olivier said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                            aGPLv3 if you think some "hosters" can use it without contributing (ie not actually run the code on your machine = no need to share your modification with GPLv2 for example).

                            Guess which license made AWS adding stuff to Xen without sharing it? So, even if I'm selling software, I'm convinced aGPLv3 is more fair toward the community. /my2cents

                            Xen is MIT licensed isn't it? Nope GPL2. Duh should have trusted the dev.

                            DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DustinB3403D
                              DustinB3403 @coliver
                              last edited by

                              @coliver said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                              @olivier said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                              aGPLv3 if you think some "hosters" can use it without contributing (ie not actually run the code on your machine = no need to share your modification with GPLv2 for example).

                              Guess which license made AWS adding stuff to Xen without sharing it? So, even if I'm selling software, I'm convinced aGPLv3 is more fair toward the community. /my2cents

                              Xen is MIT licensed isn't it?

                              GPLv2 from what I can see.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @coliver
                                last edited by

                                @coliver said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                                @olivier said in GNU AGPLv3 vs MIT licensing:

                                aGPLv3 if you think some "hosters" can use it without contributing (ie not actually run the code on your machine = no need to share your modification with GPLv2 for example).

                                Guess which license made AWS adding stuff to Xen without sharing it? So, even if I'm selling software, I'm convinced aGPLv3 is more fair toward the community. /my2cents

                                Xen is MIT licensed isn't it? Nope GPL2. Duh should have trusted the dev.

                                Xen probably predates the MIT license!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R
                                  rjt @olivier
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivier Definitely worth repeating this old post. Oracle has given back so much more than Amazon.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post