ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    History happening right now - live link

    News
    12
    20
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @CloudKnight
      last edited by

      @stuartjordan said in History happening right now - live link:

      That was brilliant, how mad them rockets landing back down where they wanted. Normally the rockets are destroyed on re-entry??

      NOt for SpaceX. They have been landing them for years now.

      CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • A
        Alex Sage
        last edited by

        Incredible!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • CloudKnightC
          CloudKnight @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @jaredbusch said in History happening right now - live link:

          @stuartjordan said in History happening right now - live link:

          That was brilliant, how mad them rockets landing back down where they wanted. Normally the rockets are destroyed on re-entry??

          NOt for SpaceX. They have been landing them for years now.

          I wasn't aware of this to be fair, don't normally follow, but still amazing to say the least, should imagine they can do more flights saving the rockets.

          bigbearB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Net RunnerN
            Net Runner
            last edited by

            OK guys, so now we have an option (theoretically) to ship 50 tons of stuff to the orbit.

            If you would have an opportunity to do so, what would you bring 150km high? IT-related, of course 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FredtxF
              Fredtx
              last edited by

              But I thought the earth was flat.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • PenguinWranglerP
                PenguinWrangler
                last edited by

                Did anyone catch the "DON'T PANIC" on the LCD screen on the Telsa Car that was in the Payload?

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @PenguinWrangler
                  last edited by

                  @penguinwrangler said in History happening right now - live link:

                  Did anyone catch the "DON'T PANIC" on the LCD screen on the Telsa Car that was in the Payload?

                  Nice, no I didn't see that.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • gjacobseG
                    gjacobse
                    last edited by gjacobse

                    The launch had it's good,.. and sadly it's bad. But for a test flight - it was a solid success in the eyes of many.

                    The twin boosters landed as planned, however in reading about the later time markers, the center core didn't land as planned:


                    Five things to know about Falcon Heavy
                    Third booster’s failure to land
                    Whilst the two side boosters re-landed without a hitch, the third, core booster was a different story. As SpaceX confirmed in a press conference, the booster only managed to relight one of the three engines needed for it to land. This meant it hit the water at 300 mph, close to the drone ship where it was supposed to land. In fact, the crash happened so close to the drone ship that it took out two of the ship’s engines.

                    travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • travisdh1T
                      travisdh1 @gjacobse
                      last edited by

                      @gjacobse said in History happening right now - live link:

                      The launch had it's good,.. and sadly it's bad. But for a test flight - it was a solid success in the eyes of many.

                      The twin boosters landed as planned, however in reading about the later time markers, the center core didn't land as planned:


                      Five things to know about Falcon Heavy
                      Third booster’s failure to land
                      Whilst the two side boosters re-landed without a hitch, the third, core booster was a different story. As SpaceX confirmed in a press conference, the booster only managed to relight one of the three engines needed for it to land. This meant it hit the water at 300 mph, close to the drone ship where it was supposed to land. In fact, the crash happened so close to the drone ship that it took out two of the ship’s engines.

                      Ah, I had wondered what happened to the center booster. That'd explain the lost video feed to their drone ship. Still, not bad for the first try of a new rocket system.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @travisdh1
                        last edited by

                        @travisdh1 said in History happening right now - live link:

                        @gjacobse said in History happening right now - live link:

                        The launch had it's good,.. and sadly it's bad. But for a test flight - it was a solid success in the eyes of many.

                        The twin boosters landed as planned, however in reading about the later time markers, the center core didn't land as planned:


                        Five things to know about Falcon Heavy
                        Third booster’s failure to land
                        Whilst the two side boosters re-landed without a hitch, the third, core booster was a different story. As SpaceX confirmed in a press conference, the booster only managed to relight one of the three engines needed for it to land. This meant it hit the water at 300 mph, close to the drone ship where it was supposed to land. In fact, the crash happened so close to the drone ship that it took out two of the ship’s engines.

                        Ah, I had wondered what happened to the center booster. That'd explain the lost video feed to their drone ship. Still, not bad for the first try of a new rocket system.

                        They lose the drone feed in a good portion of the successful drone ship landings too just because of interference.

                        gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • gjacobseG
                          gjacobse @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @jaredbusch said in History happening right now - live link:

                          @travisdh1 said in History happening right now - live link:

                          @gjacobse said in History happening right now - live link:

                          The launch had it's good,.. and sadly it's bad. But for a test flight - it was a solid success in the eyes of many.

                          The twin boosters landed as planned, however in reading about the later time markers, the center core didn't land as planned:


                          Five things to know about Falcon Heavy
                          Third booster’s failure to land
                          Whilst the two side boosters re-landed without a hitch, the third, core booster was a different story. As SpaceX confirmed in a press conference, the booster only managed to relight one of the three engines needed for it to land. This meant it hit the water at 300 mph, close to the drone ship where it was supposed to land. In fact, the crash happened so close to the drone ship that it took out two of the ship’s engines.

                          Ah, I had wondered what happened to the center booster. That'd explain the lost video feed to their drone ship. Still, not bad for the first try of a new rocket system.

                          They lose the drone feed in a good portion of the successful drone ship landings too just because of interference.

                          I haven't followed every launch / recovery - but as they were streaming yesterday it was mentioned as to the reason(s):

                          • Turbulence - due to the engine thrust the antennas 'flop' around causing signal degradation and loss.
                          • Ocean spray - pretty sure that the sea 'chop' can cause issues as well from natural swells and then added thrust generating spray.
                          • 'Splash Down' a miss saves the drone ship but generates spray and debris which can damage or obscure the cameras or antennas
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RojoLocoR
                            RojoLoco
                            last edited by

                            Here's a collection of hilarious twitter reactions the the launch...

                            https://nerdist.com/spacex-falcon-heavy-launch-best-reactions-twitter/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bigbearB
                              bigbear
                              last edited by

                              Sucks that the lost the main booster, but still amazing launch...

                              https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/6/16980954/spacex-falcon-heavy-rocket-middle-core-failed-landing

                              The Tesla car they launched will circle the Sun and make a pass afterwards by Earth and Mars

                              http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-spacex-falcon-heavy-orbit-20180207-story.html

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • bigbearB
                                bigbear @CloudKnight
                                last edited by

                                @stuartjordan said in History happening right now - live link:

                                @jaredbusch said in History happening right now - live link:

                                @stuartjordan said in History happening right now - live link:

                                That was brilliant, how mad them rockets landing back down where they wanted. Normally the rockets are destroyed on re-entry??

                                NOt for SpaceX. They have been landing them for years now.

                                I wasn't aware of this to be fair, don't normally follow, but still amazing to say the least, should imagine they can do more flights saving the rockets.

                                Every rocket that lands successfully saves tens of millions if not more on than larger ones. And the scale of a 10+ story building landing is something else as well...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post