ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Home Network Setup

    IT Discussion
    xp dhcp dns home lab xenserver kvm ubiquiti virtualization sophos linux untangle
    14
    88
    10.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

      If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

      DDNS? Like for external use?

      So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

      Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

      to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

        @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

        @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

        If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

        DDNS? Like for external use?

        So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

        Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

        to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

        That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

          @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

          @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

          @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

          @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

          @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

          If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

          DDNS? Like for external use?

          So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

          Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

          to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

          That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

          Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

          DashrenderD scottalanmillerS coliverC 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Here is the alternate.... on a non-Windows network, I don't want DNS listing random dynamic guests. That's the simplest solution. Windows does something I have no desire to have. Given that I don't know what purpose it serves, it's hard to figure out what you are actually looking to accomplish.

            black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

              @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

              @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

              @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

              @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

              @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

              @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

              If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

              DDNS? Like for external use?

              So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

              Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

              to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

              That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

              Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

              Perhaps it's a non issue - I have user based CALs, and assuming I only allow users on my network, they would already be covered. So I perhaps don't have a real need for this??

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

                DDNS? Like for external use?

                So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

                Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

                to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

                That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

                Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

                What does that have to do with the question?

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                  @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                  @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                  @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                  @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                  If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

                  DDNS? Like for external use?

                  So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

                  Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

                  to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

                  That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

                  Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

                  What does that have to do with the question?

                  The question is - how do I provide DHCP/DNS services to devices that will never otherwise talk to a Windows system hence requiring a Windows CAL license.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                    @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                    @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                    @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                    @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                    If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

                    DDNS? Like for external use?

                    So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

                    Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

                    to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

                    That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

                    Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

                    Perhaps it's a non issue - I have user based CALs, and assuming I only allow users on my network, they would already be covered. So I perhaps don't have a real need for this??

                    The question is only this....

                    Why do you want dynamically updated DNS on your network?

                    If your goal is to replace Windows, ask how to do that, not how to do this thing. This is in the weeds. This is a technical piece, not a goal itself. Who cares about this if you don't need it?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                      @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                      If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

                      DDNS? Like for external use?

                      So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

                      Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

                      to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

                      That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

                      Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

                      The reason is to be able to use hostnames as opposed to IP addresses. Windows accomplishes this via their Dynamic Updates (which is not DDNS that's something completely different) so machines will auto-update their own DNS entries like they currently do with Windows DNS and Windows DHCP. As far as I'm aware the DHCP server doesn't actually do updates to the DNS records the clients do the updates.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                        @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                        If so, does UBNT based gear support dynamic DNS?

                        DDNS? Like for external use?

                        So now that we know that Windows can self register with DDNS, thoughts on moving away from Windows based DHCP and DNS for internal networks? Any chance UNBT gear can or ever would support this?

                        Let's back up. Why would you want this? What's the goal here?

                        to have a single DHCP/DNS setup for all network devices without paying Windows CALs for non Windows devices (devices that won't be accessing windows services/servers)

                        That's not a goal, that's a solution. What's the REASON you want any of that?

                        Seriously? why would I not want to have to buy Windows CALs? really?

                        What does that have to do with the question?

                        The question is - how do I provide DHCP/DNS services to devices that will never otherwise talk to a Windows system hence requiring a Windows CAL license.

                        And my question is going to keep being "Why do you care?"

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @coliver
                          last edited by

                          @coliver said in Home Network Setup:

                          The reason is to be able to use hostnames as opposed to IP addresses.

                          Still not a goal. Why does your CEO want this?

                          K DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            krisleslie @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller I’m confused also 😾

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                              @coliver said in Home Network Setup:

                              The reason is to be able to use hostnames as opposed to IP addresses.

                              Still not a goal. Why does your CEO want this?

                              Scott - please don't inject someone else into this conversation. This is a theoretical question, nothing more.

                              If you need a real situation here you go.

                              You have a warehouse, you have warehouse people and office people. The warehouse people use hand scanners that get DHCP assigned addresses, but otherwise do not use and Windows services (nor do the users). These devices are on the same network as laptops for the office workers.

                              Assuming Windows Server is providing DHCP/DNS to those hand held device, you need a Windows Server CAL for each and every one. Solve for x.

                              coliverC scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • coliverC
                                coliver @Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                                @coliver said in Home Network Setup:

                                The reason is to be able to use hostnames as opposed to IP addresses.

                                Still not a goal. Why does your CEO want this?

                                Scott - please don't inject someone else into this conversation. This is a theoretical question, nothing more.

                                If you need a real situation here you go.

                                You have a warehouse, you have warehouse people and office people. The warehouse people use hand scanners that get DHCP assigned addresses, but otherwise do not use and Windows services (nor do the users). These devices are on the same network as laptops for the office workers.

                                Assuming Windows Server is providing DHCP/DNS to those hand held device, you need a Windows Server CAL for each and every one. Solve for x.

                                Nah, that breaks what you're after. DHCP can hand out IP addresses. That's not in question right?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                                  @coliver said in Home Network Setup:

                                  The reason is to be able to use hostnames as opposed to IP addresses.

                                  Still not a goal. Why does your CEO want this?

                                  Scott - please don't inject someone else into this conversation. This is a theoretical question, nothing more.

                                  And in any theoretical IT discussion, there needs to be a business goal (e.g. it matters to your CEO.) And in your question, there is none. The question doesn't make sense because you are asking "how do I do a technical thing" that doesn't make sense to want to do in the way you are asking it.

                                  Can it be done? Sure. Would you ever want it? Not the way you are asking, no.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    @dashrender said in Home Network Setup:

                                    You have a warehouse, you have warehouse people and office people. The warehouse people use hand scanners that get DHCP assigned addresses, but otherwise do not use and Windows services (nor do the users). These devices are on the same network as laptops for the office workers.

                                    Assuming Windows Server is providing DHCP/DNS to those hand held device, you need a Windows Server CAL for each and every one. Solve for x.

                                    I already did. Stop using DNS for this. There is no purpose to DNS. Period. That's the issue. Again, a false assumption. You assume DNS plays a role here, it does not. Plain and simple.

                                    So you are scratching an itch that doesn't exist. Hence why I keep harping about the goal. Since you simple fix the problem by not trying to do this, what am I missing?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Patient: "It hurts when I hit myself in the head."
                                      Doctor: "Stop hitting yourself in the head."

                                      CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        In a normal network, with scanners on DHCP, that isn't a Windows network, there is no such need as this, the very idea sounds so silly. Given that avoiding the Windows CALs here is automatic and the default, do you see why it's confusing that there is nothing to answer other than "don't do that?"

                                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • CloudKnightC
                                          CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Home Network Setup:

                                          Patient: "It hurts when I hit myself in the head."
                                          Doctor: "Stop hitting yourself in the head."

                                          Just becomes a problem, if someone hits you in the head lol...

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            I know what is going on here. There is a false assumption being added, and totally unstated, and it is the bases for all of the conclusions. Ready...

                                            A few people are assuming Active Directory here, and have never mentioned it.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 2 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post