Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update
-
So I uploaded the 1.9.0 firmware file with scp (the ER-X doesn't have internet access yet, not final install.)
add system image ER-e50.v1.9.0.4901118.tarComplained about not enough space available. Fine, uploaded through the gui, and it worked fine. ???
I'll have to tackle the duel WAN tomorrow, after verifying I got all my documentation correct.
-
Very odd. Maybe one way caches it and one way does not?
-
@StrongBad said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
Very odd. Maybe one way caches it and one way does not?
I don't really care that much, as it worked. Would be highly annoying if I only had access to a command line tho. Plus, I have an unnatural love affair with command lines everywhere.
-
@travisdh1 said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
Complained about not enough space available. Fine, uploaded through the gui, and it worked fine.
Wait...is this 1 time when GUI worked better than CLI?
-
@Breffni-Potter said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
@travisdh1 said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
Complained about not enough space available. Fine, uploaded through the gui, and it worked fine.
Wait...is this 1 time when GUI worked better than CLI?
Yep. Very odd.
-
@Breffni-Potter said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
@travisdh1 said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
Complained about not enough space available. Fine, uploaded through the gui, and it worked fine.
Wait...is this 1 time when GUI worked better than CLI?
There is probably a way to replicate that with a command line, we just don't know what it is.
-
@travisdh1 said in Ubiquiti ER-X Initial Firmware Update:
So I uploaded the 1.9.0 firmware file with scp (the ER-X doesn't have internet access yet, not final install.)
add system image ER-e50.v1.9.0.4901118.tarComplained about not enough space available. Fine, uploaded through the gui, and it worked fine. ???
I'll have to tackle the duel WAN tomorrow, after verifying I got all my documentation correct.
Well, it's setup and being used. I'm have a feeling I'm going to have to limit http and https traffic with the QOS settings on it tho. Two 700k/300k DSL connections don't go very far
I also need to get the static routing figured out. I tried adding a static route to our web host (viviotech.net), and it still sends traffic out of whichever of the WAN ports it decides is better. Bet I forgot a NAT setting somewhere, now that I think about it?
The boxes are amazing for the price.
