ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Lost Access to Azure

    IT Discussion
    azure microsoft
    10
    31
    3.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
      last edited by

      @aaronstuder said:

      I know a handful of people that use it, and there very happy with it.

      Are they people who have carefully considered the alternatives? We know a lot of people who have used it and the issue levels are pretty high, as are the costs. Even if it worked really well, which is consistently does not, the cost is not that good. Not horrible, but not that good.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
        last edited by

        @aaronstuder said:

        @BRRABill Azure.

        Dropbox for business is mega expensive.

        As is Azure 🙂

        We have some workloads having their cost cut by 95% moving off!

        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • FATeknollogeeF
          FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          As is Azure 🙂

          We have some workloads having their cost cut by 95% moving off!

          Can you share those details?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
            last edited by

            @FATeknollogee said:

            Can you share those details?

            The combination of moving from Azure to DO and from Windows to Linux has allowed some workloads to go from over $100/mo to $5/mo! We haven't had a chance to test performance yet outside of "it was adequate and it remains adequate" but my guess is that we will actually see an improvement.

            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stacksofplatesS
              stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said:

              @FATeknollogee said:

              Can you share those details?

              The combination of moving from Azure to DO and from Windows to Linux has allowed some workloads to go from over $100/mo to $5/mo! We haven't had a chance to test performance yet outside of "it was adequate and it remains adequate" but my guess is that we will actually see an improvement.

              Why running on Windows on Azure? I thought they had some Linux images? (I've never used it but thought I heard that somewhere)

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                last edited by

                @johnhooks said:

                Why running on Windows on Azure? I thought they had some Linux images? (I've never used it but thought I heard that somewhere)

                Yeah, but why use that either? The only reason I would look to Azure is for a Windows dominated service, and that was the excuse used to get the services there. This ignored the fact that Windows made the service work and Azure made the hosting worse. Together, it was pretty awful.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • FATeknollogeeF
                  FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  Moving quite a few things to Digital Ocean and Linux.

                  Digital Ocean is the cloud service & Linux is the o/s?

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                    last edited by

                    @FATeknollogee said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    Moving quite a few things to Digital Ocean and Linux.

                    Digital Ocean is the cloud service & Linux is the o/s?

                    Correct. Nearly everything we run is CentOS 7 Linux these days. And we use a mix of Rackspace and Digital Ocean for our primary cloud providers. We use Vultr just a little for special cases. And while we like AWS a lot, they don't tend to work well for our needs.

                    Azure we use, again, for special purposes but working to reduce that as much as possible. It's a very rare workload that works well there and we are finding that sweet spot to be getting smaller and smaller.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • FATeknollogeeF
                      FATeknollogee
                      last edited by

                      I see that ownCloud is available on DO.

                      Anyone using it hosted on DO?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @FATeknollogee said:

                        I see that ownCloud is available on DO.

                        It's available anywhere, just install it 🙂 DO just happens to make a handy installer for it, but it uses Ubuntu 14.04, I believe, which I am not going to touch. I would do my own install of ownCloud there (or anywhere.) Those prebuilt systems are find for playing with an app that you have never seen before, but are really not okay for production usage. If you can't build it yourself you can't reliably admin the box, especially once updates are needed!

                        ownCloud specifically is far better on Vultr than DO because of Vultr's storage oriented large capacity SATA options.

                        stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stacksofplatesS
                          stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller

                          but it uses Ubuntu 14.04, I believe, which I am not going to touch

                          You say from your 14.04 based Mint laptop 😛

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                            last edited by

                            @johnhooks said:

                            @scottalanmiller

                            but it uses Ubuntu 14.04, I believe, which I am not going to touch

                            You say from your 14.04 based Mint laptop 😛

                            I know, I hate that they decided to do that.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 2 / 2
                            • First post
                              Last post