Pretty awesome. I'll happily buy one to play with at that price.

Wow, that dashboard is sharp!

@scottalanmiller said:

@johnhooks said:

That seems like it's the furthest away from what the company actually does without being in another field. Kind of like McDonald's opening a build your own pizza shop.

Actually it's an entirely different field. Like McDonald's opening up a flower shop. ISP and hosting service are not related.

I was thinking technology as a whole but ya that's true.

@Breffni-Potter said:

@johnhooks said:

I have a hard time believing they will be able to secure their own as much as the big companies.

I'm sure the KGB will be part of the process, same as the NSA gets involved with Microsoft 🙂

Much harder to do with open source since people could compile stuff themselves.

I would guess that HP-UX will be retired. The cost of porting it will be high and so much of its value was tied to PA-RISC and then to Itanium. HP-UX on Xeon will lack much of what made HP-UX important.

The original Command and Conquer was on Windows 3.1 - damn it was funny playing it new computers, the Mammoth Tanks had rooster tails they moved so fast!
😄

For a hosted solution, I've used Sealion before. The free offering isn't too bad for not important stuff ( you only get 3 days of data retention).

May be a screen recording tool like camtasia (trial) might help? 🙂

@travisdh1 said:

@johnhooks said:

@travisdh1 said:

#HelpDeskFail "“So I called up, told them I was new and I didn't understand how to get past [the portal],” the hacker told Motherboard. “They asked if I had a token code, I said no, they said ‘that's fine — just use our one.’”"

You mean they didn't crawl through the vents and hang from the ceiling over a pressure sensitive floor?

You forgot the egregious body shots of a woman crawling though "laser" lights.

Bright lasers, so that you can clearly see them and her, of course.

Why? Why would they do that! Oh the humanity!

Seems like maybe they should have noticed, but does not seem like the breach or issue was really all that big.

Lots of fake reviews, probably not the biggest deal.

If I had one still, I might consider it. But a combination of ultra slow performance and nearly unusably small screen (for windows) - I have no desire to even try.

The blind leading the blind, I guess.

@scottalanmiller Thank you, thank you! I'll be here all week. I could resist sparking up a conversation that way.

It would not be unlikely for the power of this workstation to be comparable to more than the processing capabilities of a fully populated Proliant DL580 quad CPU Xeon server.