@dafyre At most, I'm only seeing around 2000 devices through the day

@JaredBusch said in UniFi USG and XG:

@scottalanmiller said in UniFi USG and XG:

@JaredBusch said in UniFi USG and XG:

It is still something I would never use.

I want my router to be a router.

Heck yeah. Get this instead.

https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgerouter-infinity/

HAHAHAH

I can get something for 50 users or 20,000 users.

@scottalanmiller said in UniFi USG and XG:

@Markferron said in UniFi USG and XG:

@DustinB3403 said in UniFi USG and XG:

The USG is the Unifi Security Gateway and the XG is an Access Point.

They aren't remotely the same thing, so what you're asking doesn't make sense.

https://unifi-xg.ubnt.com/usg-xg-8
They just call it an XG Gateway

Wow, that's quite a leap from their other models.

Yeah it really is. Honestly I need something between the XG and the Pro model.

@DustinB3403 said in UniFi USG and XG:

@Markferron said in UniFi USG and XG:

@DustinB3403 said in UniFi USG and XG:

The USG is the Unifi Security Gateway and the XG is an Access Point.

They aren't remotely the same thing, so what you're asking doesn't make sense.

https://unifi-xg.ubnt.com/usg-xg-8
They just call it an XG Gateway

Searching for Unifi XG comes up with this as the top result.

https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap-xg/

Hence the confusion on my part.

Yeah I got excited when I thought I found the XG Gateway on Amazon for $400. Then i saw it was just the switch.

@DustinB3403 said in UniFi USG and XG:

The USG is the Unifi Security Gateway and the XG is an Access Point.

They aren't remotely the same thing, so what you're asking doesn't make sense.

https://unifi-xg.ubnt.com/usg-xg-8
They just call it an XG Gateway

Looking to move to the XG over the summer. Is the USG comparable as far as software features? I want to be comfortable with the interface before we spend a few thousand.

@DustinB3403 said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

To me it sounds like you have a partially functional backup solution, neither of which is fulfilling the needs as a whole.

You're defnintely right about that. We're working off of old hardware and software, and both will take awhile to get up to date. For that reason I think I'll have to go with Backblaze just for now while I work on a permanent solution. Thanks for the Nextcloud ideas, sounds like a a real money saver.

@JaredBusch said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

@Markferron back to the topic title, I prefer BackBlaze today. Simply because CrashPlan shit on me. Their Business service did not change, but telling the residential service to jsut piss off because they made bad business decisions?

Meh, they are still making bad choices.

Funny you mention that. Read a lot of pissed off people on that topic...

@dafyre said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

As long as the NextCloud server is available off-site, even remote laptops should work as well.

Hmm...maybe that'll be the excuse I need to finally start moving things to a colo.

@DustinB3403 said in Crashplan vs Backblaze in 2018:

Can I ask why you are protecting user devices though? Generally these have very little on them and through simple policy can everything be saved on your servers or cloud and thus don't need backup.

I would really like to do this. We have onedrive available for all of our users and I was thinking of coming up with some sort of system that just uses their onedrive as the primary source of their homefolder.

I read a few posts comparing Crashplan to Backblaze dated back in 2016 and it seemed that most people were leaning towards Crashplan due to its reliability. Has that opinion changed at all two years later? We currently have a very old installation of Crashplan on campus and I am looking towards upgrading. Personally I'm leaning towards Backblaze for our of our laptops that go off campus, but keeping Crashplan (the most updated version) on our file servers. The main reason is that our bandwidth is not that great and keeping a local backup would be much faster if we needed it. I don't know if this is a waste of money and time with me splitting up different backup services. What do you guys think?

@travisdh1 I guess a proxy sounds right. I've never messed with one other than the one on my pfsense router at home. What would that look like? A static route to the proxy server from the firewall, I'm assuming?

We're getting rid of our Meraki MX400 considering the cost is around $9920 for one year of Advanced Security. I'm going towards a UniFi gateway, but I need something that will do content filtering. I've read a few threads in ML and, in general, people in general don't like combining firewalls and UTM devices/applications. Why is that? Also, what would you recommend that I use for content filtering?

@DustinB3403
Hah, probably. Figured this would be the quicker route.

@DustinB3403 said in Restarting networking service fails - Ubuntu 16.04:

Okay I'll bite, why the hell are you deploying 16.04?!

I'm having issues with 18, and I need to get something up and running quickly. Do plan on moving it to 18 though.

@dafyre said in Restarting networking service fails - Ubuntu 16.04:

@Markferron -- the little things that will come back and bite you.

You've dealt with me too much. It's too easy for you.

@black3dynamite Yikes that's embarrassing...thank you.

@scottalanmiller
I think it worked...at least I don't see angry red text or the word fail anywhere...

itdept@IT-DHCP:~$ sudo ifdown ens4
itdept@IT-DHCP:~$ sudo ifup -v ens4
Configuring interface ens4=ens4 (inet)
/bin/run-parts --exit-on-error --verbose /etc/network/if-pre-up.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ethtool
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave
+ [ inet = meta ]
+ IF_BOND_SLAVES=
+ [  ]
+ [  ]
+ [ -z  ]
+ exit
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan
/bin/ip addr add 10.0.33.110/255.255.224.0 broadcast 10.0.63.255          dev en                                                                                        s4 label ens4
/bin/ip link set dev ens4   up
 /bin/ip route add default via 10.0.32.2  dev ens4 onlink
/bin/run-parts --exit-on-error --verbose /etc/network/if-up.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-up.d/000resolvconf
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-up.d/ethtool
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave
+ [ inet = meta ]
+ [  ]
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-up.d/ip
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-up.d/openssh-server
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart
run-parts: executing /e

@scottalanmiller

itdept@IT-DHCP:~$ sudo ifup -v ens4
Configuring interface ens4=ens4 (inet)
/bin/run-parts --exit-on-error --verbose /etc/network/if-pre-up.d
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ethtool
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave
+ [ inet = meta ]
+ IF_BOND_SLAVES=
+ [  ]
+ [  ]
+ [ -z  ]
+ exit
run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan
/bin/ip addr add 10.0.33.110/255.255.224.0 broadcast 10.0.63.255          dev en
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Failed to bring up ens4.
itdept@IT-DHCP:~$

Oh and the error hah...

itdept@IT-DHCP:~$ systemctl status networking.service
● networking.service - Raise network interfaces
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/networking.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
  Drop-In: /run/systemd/generator/networking.service.d
           └─50-insserv.conf-$network.conf
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2018-10-23 14:33:55 EDT; 8min ago
     Docs: man:interfaces(5)
  Process: 2227 ExecStart=/sbin/ifup -a --read-environment (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
  Process: 2221 ExecStartPre=/bin/sh -c [ "$CONFIGURE_INTERFACES" != "no" ] && [ -n "$(ifquery --read-environment --list --exclude=lo)" ] && udevadm settle (code=exited
 Main PID: 2227 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP systemd[1]: Starting Raise network interfaces...
Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP ifup[2227]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP ifup[2227]: Failed to bring up ens4.
Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP systemd[1]: networking.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP systemd[1]: Failed to start Raise network interfaces.
Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP systemd[1]: networking.service: Unit entered failed state.
Oct 23 14:33:55 IT-DHCP systemd[1]: networking.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
lines 1-17/17 (END)