CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address
-
The DHCP server is set to a lease time of 6 hours.
Here is
grep dhcp /var/log/messagesand you can see the log timestamp going way ahead.Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9740] dhcp4 (eth0): address 10.254.0.36 Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9742] dhcp4 (eth0): plen 24 (255.255.255.0) Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9742] dhcp4 (eth0): gateway 10.254.0.1 Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9742] dhcp4 (eth0): server identifier 10.254.0.21 Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9743] dhcp4 (eth0): lease time 21600 Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9743] dhcp4 (eth0): nameserver '10.254.0.21' Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9743] dhcp4 (eth0): nameserver '10.254.0.27' Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9743] dhcp4 (eth0): domain name 'ad.bundystl.com' Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc NetworkManager[662]: <info> [1485898937.9743] dhcp4 (eth0): state changed bound -> bound Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc nm-dispatcher: req:1 'dhcp4-change' [eth0]: new request (3 scripts) Jan 31 15:42:17 bnasc nm-dispatcher: req:1 'dhcp4-change' [eth0]: start running ordered scripts... Feb 1 18:29:49 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995389.2647] dhcp-init: Using DHCP client 'dhclient' Feb 1 18:29:49 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995389.9799] dhcp4 (eth0): activation: beginning transaction (timeout in 45 seconds) Feb 1 18:29:49 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995389.9932] dhcp4 (eth0): dhclient started with pid 761 Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2462] dhcp4 (eth0): address 10.254.0.36 Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2462] dhcp4 (eth0): plen 24 (255.255.255.0) Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2463] dhcp4 (eth0): gateway 10.254.0.1 Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2463] dhcp4 (eth0): server identifier 10.254.0.21 Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2463] dhcp4 (eth0): lease time 21600 Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2463] dhcp4 (eth0): nameserver '10.254.0.21' Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2463] dhcp4 (eth0): nameserver '10.254.0.27' Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2463] dhcp4 (eth0): domain name 'ad.bundystl.com' Feb 1 18:29:50 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485995390.2464] dhcp4 (eth0): state changed unknown -> bound Feb 1 09:00:20 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961220.8147] dhcp4 (eth0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP client pid 761 Feb 1 09:00:20 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961220.8147] dhcp4 (eth0): state changed bound -> done Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.0533] dhcp4 (eth0): activation: beginning transaction (timeout in 45 seconds) Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.0577] dhcp4 (eth0): dhclient started with pid 20673 Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1079] dhcp4 (eth0): address 10.254.0.36 Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1080] dhcp4 (eth0): plen 24 (255.255.255.0) Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1080] dhcp4 (eth0): gateway 10.254.0.1 Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1080] dhcp4 (eth0): server identifier 10.254.0.21 Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1080] dhcp4 (eth0): lease time 21600 Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1080] dhcp4 (eth0): nameserver '10.254.0.21' Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1080] dhcp4 (eth0): nameserver '10.254.0.27' Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1081] dhcp4 (eth0): domain name 'ad.bundystl.com' Feb 1 09:00:22 bnasc NetworkManager[659]: <info> [1485961222.1081] dhcp4 (eth0): state changed unknown -> bound -
Nothing in the DHCP Server event logs except the reservation creation and deletion informational events.
-
I have no clue where to go with this now. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
-
Look what I found..
grep clock /var/log/messages* /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: rtc_cmos 00:00: setting system clock to 2017-02-28 13:17:53 UTC (1488287873) /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_pageHow in the fuck do I fix this?
Time sync from the host has never been enabled. I realize it always gets it at boot and I did reboot last night because I updated the Hyper-V host.
The host also has the correct time.
C:\>time /t 04:03 PM C:\>date /t Mon 02/13/2017 C:\Users\bnaadmin>
-
Do I blame integration services for this one? Microsoft has a different line of Integration services that can be installed, but then it breaks the built in package method.
-
This would also be why @scottalanmiller never sees this. I do not believe that he has hyper-v running anywhere with a bunch of CentOS systems on it, that are also using DHCP.
-
@stacksofplates said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
You could also just go back to ntpd. It's still available and might not have the issue. It also has a file under /etc/sysconfig/ntpd where you can set ntpd to update the hw clock.
Looks like
chronywas actually keeping things good. It was just not catching the weird skew from the hardware good enough. -
I dont have a specific answer for you, but I always seem to have a problem with pool.org ntp servers. So much so that i dont use them anymore.
I use nist servers instead.
time.nist.gov global address for all servers Multiple locations
time-nw.nist.gov 131.107.13.100 Microsoft, Redmond, Washington
There are probably other regional ones nearer to you -
@momurda said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
I dont have a specific answer for you, but I always seem to have a problem with pool.org ntp servers. So much so that i dont use them anymore.
Problem seems to not be with the ntp.org servers. It is the hardware clock seemingly being random as f***.
-
@JaredBusch said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
Look what I found..
grep clock /var/log/messages* /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: rtc_cmos 00:00: setting system clock to 2017-02-28 13:17:53 UTC (1488287873) /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_pageI just noticed the time skew here 1488287873 seconds is the real time, inseconds, since Unix Time began. Is it possibly something wrong with the clock on the hw itself? Battery, something else not easily fixable.
edit: unless the time wasnt actually 00:00 jan 1 1970 when it was changed
edit2: your clock was actually in the future here and set back in time a couple weeks. ignore what i say. -
@momurda said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
@JaredBusch said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
Look what I found..
grep clock /var/log/messages* /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: rtc_cmos 00:00: setting system clock to 2017-02-28 13:17:53 UTC (1488287873) /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_pageI just noticed the time skew here 1488287873 seconds is the real time, inseconds, since Unix Time began.
That is not displaying a skew, that is displaying the time it is setting it to.
-
A little more digging, but no answers yet.
cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_page cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_page hyperv_clocksource acpi_pm -
@JaredBusch said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
@stacksofplates said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
You could also just go back to ntpd. It's still available and might not have the issue. It also has a file under /etc/sysconfig/ntpd where you can set ntpd to update the hw clock.
Looks like
chronywas actually keeping things good. It was just not catching the weird skew from the hardware good enough.Ya I have found chronyd to be more reliable than ntpd, but that's anecdotal. I can't say I've seen this happen, but I don't have any Hyper-V servers at all. Even though I don't have DHCP setup (I want to move all of our static stuff to reservations though), I would at least notice because we authenticate to all of the RHEL systems with Kerberos
-
@JaredBusch said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:
Look what I found..
grep clock /var/log/messages* /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: rtc_cmos 00:00: setting system clock to 2017-02-28 13:17:53 UTC (1488287873) /var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_pageHow in the fuck do I fix this?
Time sync from the host has never been enabled. I realize it always gets it at boot and I did reboot last night because I updated the Hyper-V host.
The host also has the correct time.
C:\>time /t 04:03 PM C:\>date /t Mon 02/13/2017 C:\Users\bnaadmin>Can you remind me again why you will not or can not use the Hypervisor time? Does the time match the host if you actually enable the "Time Synchronization" service?
-
Question: have you tried setting up the DHCP server as the time master, and having the Centos system sync time to the DHCP server (with said DHCP server syncing to NIST or whatever time source you prefer) instead of the NTP Pool? That way theoretically DHCP server and Centos should be at the same time. Just a thought.
