ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    BRRABill's Field Report With XenServer

    IT Discussion
    20
    750
    382.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BRRABillB
      BRRABill @olivier
      last edited by

      @olivier said:

      @BRRABill Okay so the only difference with us is they keep ended tasks for a time (how much time?)

      It disappears when you exit XC.

      It would just be nice to be able to check in and see if the task actually finished OK, or finished but with errors, or didn't finish at all.

      As it stands now, you really don't know, right?

      Is that something that COULD be added? Or is it useless and I"m missing the reason why it's useless? (Which is entirely, entirely possible!)

      olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BRRABillB
        BRRABill
        last edited by

        @olivier

        Do you have to enable auto-power-on on the pool, before you can do it to individual VMs in XO?

        My servers are set to auto-power-on in XO, but do not come back up when XS reboots.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierO
          olivier @BRRABill
          last edited by

          @BRRABill Yes It could be added, but XAPI tasks are such a mess. We can't be sure about them, but yes it's possible to fetch them and store them somewhere. But it will be only informative and not the "truth".

          About auto power on: if you did it with XO, it's normally done in both pool and VM at the same time (see https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/auto-start-vm-on-xenserver-boot/ ).

          To check your current pool status with autopower on: xe pool-param-get uuid=<POOL_UUID> param-name=other-config

          BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BRRABillB
            BRRABill @olivier
            last edited by

            @olivier said:

            To check your current pool status with autopower on: xe pool-param-get uuid=<POOL_UUID> param-name=other-config

            This is what that command returned:
            cpuid_feature_mask: ffffff7f-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff; memory-ratio-hvm: 0.25; memory-ratio-pv: 0.25

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierO
              olivier
              last edited by

              Hmm no autopower_on activated. I imagine you already tick the checkbox on the XO GUI? Normally, this will add the right parameter in the pool. If not, I have to check this on my side too.

              BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BRRABillB
                BRRABill @olivier
                last edited by

                @olivier said:

                Hmm no autopower_on activated. I imagine you already tick the checkbox on the XO GUI? Normally, this will add the right parameter in the pool. If not, I have to check this on my side too.

                You mean the "auto power" dropdown on the VM? Yes.

                Just to test, I enabled it though the CLI, and then re-ran the commands, and this is what it said. Note I did NOT adjust the parameter for the VM itself through the CLI, so perhaps XO just needed the pool setting changed. I rebooted, and it did indeed auto-start.

                [root@xenserver-TEST ~]# xe pool-param-get uuid=3526ffee-1afe-6162-0afc-6362580d10cc param-name=other-config

                auto_poweron: true; cpuid_feature_mask: ffffff7f-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff; memory-ratio-hvm: 0.25; memory-ratio-pv: 0.25

                [root@xenserver-TEST ~]# xe vm-param-get uuid=d09990ec-73ce-9946-9698-8b8ba70621fe param-name=other-config

                auto_poweron: true; vgpu_pci: ; mac_seed: b3cddb7b-b5ec-f3c8-368a-2ba33059f96a; install-methods: cdrom; base_template_name: Windows Server 2012 R2 (64-bit)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierO
                  olivier
                  last edited by

                  AFAIK, XO would do both (activate the "autopower" on your VM but also on its pool).

                  If it's not the case anymore, maybe something is broken on our side. Let me check that.

                  BRRABillB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • BRRABillB
                    BRRABill @olivier
                    last edited by

                    @olivier said:

                    AFAIK, XO would do both (activate the "autopower" on your VM but also on its pool).

                    If it's not the case anymore, maybe something is broken on our side. Let me check that.

                    Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • BRRABillB
                      BRRABill @olivier
                      last edited by

                      @olivier said:

                      AFAIK, XO would do both (activate the "autopower" on your VM but also on its pool).

                      If it's not the case anymore, maybe something is broken on our side. Let me check that.

                      They did in recent versions apparently remove the "auto power on" from the GUI due to issues with HA. I wonder if that broke something on your end?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierO
                        olivier
                        last edited by

                        Don't know.

                        But we are doing this in the code:

                            if auto_poweron
                              yield xapi.call 'VM.add_to_other_config', ref, 'auto_poweron', 'true'
                              yield xapi.setPoolProperties({autoPowerOn: true})
                            else
                              yield xapi.call 'VM.remove_from_other_config', ref, 'auto_poweron'
                        
                        

                        So in theory, this should work.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • BRRABillB
                          BRRABill
                          last edited by

                          On my Server 2003 VM, whenever I go to console, it loads the following dialog box. I hit CANCEL and the console shows up.

                          Does not do this on my Server 2012 eval box.

                          Any thoughts on why it does this? Is this standard?

                          0_1459974225040_rd-console.png

                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @BRRABill
                            last edited by Dashrender

                            @BRRABill said:

                            On my Server 2003 VM, whenever I go to console, it loads the following dialog box. I hit CANCEL and the console shows up.

                            Does not do this on my Server 2012 eval box.

                            Any thoughts on why it does this? Is this standard?

                            0_1459974225040_rd-console.png

                            Yep...Because the older version of RDP doesn't have authentication like the new one. So assuming you're using Windows 7 or newer on the client side, the RDP client in Win7 or newer is looking for that authentication - which it gets from Server 2012, but not from 2003 - and it's warning you of such.

                            BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • BRRABillB
                              BRRABill @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @Dashrender

                              Is the "console" tab using RDP?

                              DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @BRRABill
                                last edited by Dashrender

                                @BRRABill said:

                                @Dashrender

                                Is the "console" tab using RDP?

                                No the console tab in XC is using whatever protocol Citrix decided to use to pull the console in, it's completely outside of Windows.

                                Open mouth, insert foot - apparently I don't know what I'm talking about 😛 he has a picture where XC is demanding RDC info.. the above show picture..

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BRRABillB
                                  BRRABill
                                  last edited by

                                  PROOF! 🙂

                                  0_1459976241949_dash-xc-rdp.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                                    last edited by

                                    @BRRABill said:

                                    @Dashrender

                                    Is the "console" tab using RDP?

                                    Might, it is an open protocol. Lots of things use it. I assumed VNC as that is the standard, but RDP is totally possible.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      @Dashrender said:

                                      No the console tab in XC is using whatever protocol Citrix decided to use to pull the console in, it's completely outside of Windows.

                                      All of this is absolutely true... except possible the "no" at the beginning.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • BRRABillB
                                        BRRABill
                                        last edited by

                                        I thought using RDP to manage servers was a ML no-no.

                                        scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                                          last edited by

                                          @BRRABill said:

                                          I thought using RDP to manage servers was a ML no-no.

                                          You aren't using it to manage the servers, you are using it to install them and you aren't connected to the server with it, but to the platform.

                                          And it IS a no no regardless, you should not be managing a server post install from the console at all. RDP is a no no because you should not be at the console.

                                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @BRRABill
                                            last edited by

                                            @BRRABill said:

                                            I thought using RDP to manage servers was a ML no-no.

                                            I'm wondering where that came from?

                                            While I do try to use RSAT whenever possible, the convinence of RDPing into a server sometimes just can't be beat.

                                            Heck i was just RDP'ed into my Exchange and AD1 servers...

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 16
                                            • 17
                                            • 18
                                            • 19
                                            • 20
                                            • 37
                                            • 38
                                            • 18 / 38
                                            • First post
                                              Last post