ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Hyper-V Failover Live Migration failed. Error 21502

    IT Discussion
    7
    59
    26.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O
      original_anvil Vendor @LAH3385
      last edited by original_anvil

      Hi guys!
      @scottalanmiller , thanks for bringing me in
      @LAH3385 on my experience that happens due to some not obvious, but really tiny misconfiguration. Like wrong partitioning, not configured MPIO, etc.
      It's not like I do want to highjack this thread, but it would be much easier for me to resolve this if we could jump on the remote session. Is that actually possible? If so, then let's schedule one (email me to [email protected]) and me or you, or both of us gonna post an update for the community after. Do we have a deal?:)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        I thought the issue was resolved?

        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          original_anvil Vendor @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said:

          I thought the issue was resolved?

          Well, I am responsible for customer care, so I want to be completely sure 🙂

          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • L
            LAH3385 @original_anvil
            last edited by

            @original_anvil
            The issue is resolved. However I am experiencing another "problem". I don't want to call it an issue since it does not prohibit the VM server from functioning, nor Failover to fail. I am using the VM servers as file server and some accounting application. I cannot seem to make the network bandwidth as stable as it is on physical server.
            On a test 5GB file transfer between my PC to VM server, the transfer rate fluctuated between 7MB to 11MB. Some time as low as 4MB
            On the same test between my PC to physical server, the transfer rate is steady at 11MB.
            It is not much but for 70 users it might cause performance issue. Any idea?

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @LAH3385
              last edited by

              @LAH3385 said:

              @original_anvil
              The issue is resolved. However I am experiencing another "problem". I don't want to call it an issue since it does not prohibit the VM server from functioning, nor Failover to fail. I am using the VM servers as file server and some accounting application. I cannot seem to make the network bandwidth as stable as it is on physical server.
              On a test 5GB file transfer between my PC to VM server, the transfer rate fluctuated between 7MB to 11MB. Some time as low as 4MB
              On the same test between my PC to physical server, the transfer rate is steady at 11MB.
              It is not much but for 70 users it might cause performance issue. Any idea?

              What is your network setup?
              What NICs are doing the disk replication between the servers? Is the network and the vSAN traffic on the same switch (or are you using cross over cables?)?

              L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • L
                LAH3385 @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender

                Server(VM server) > Cisco(1GB) > patch panel > my PC
                Server has 4 ethernet ports. Port 1 is connected to Cisco switch. Port 3&4 is connected between the 2 failover servers via cross-over cable.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  What's the saturation level on 3&4? Are the linked into a single pipe?

                  L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • L
                    LAH3385 @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender
                    How do I check that?

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @LAH3385
                      last edited by

                      @LAH3385 said:

                      @Dashrender
                      How do I check that?

                      I'd start by opening task manager and seeing how the graphs look for those interfaces - I'm not how how to setup NIC teaming - though with Server 2012 it's supposed to be pretty easy.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • L
                        LAH3385 @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender
                        I really do not know what am I looking for. The first three are physical. The last one is VM.
                        0_1451931217385_upload-af6f8c83-426e-4455-adc5-1710279b5670

                        0_1451931298248_upload-9b43bfd9-a169-470d-a83b-6664a5c04402

                        0_1451931311922_upload-53c36030-9c8d-4a21-b4f9-6636cbfbbacd

                        0_1451931254009_upload-59a868fa-3af1-4b35-9a6b-c6163df5bb67

                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @LAH3385
                          last edited by

                          @LAH3385 said:

                          @Dashrender
                          I really do not know what am I looking for. The first three are physical. The last one is VM.

                          You mean the first three are the NICs in the Hyper-Visor, and the last one is the VM?

                          Ok the second and third look linked.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • L
                            LAH3385 @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender
                            Yes. that is correct.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              Those numbers look good. Move a huge file (at least 2 GB, though it might need to be more like 4 or 6 GB so the transfer lasts long enough) from the server and take screen shots after about 30 seconds in, then move from the workstation to the server, again take screen shots about 30 seconds in.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • L
                                LAH3385 @Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                @Dashrender
                                First screenshot 5GB. transfer rate 8MB/s - 12MB/s
                                0_1451936327717_upload-88af4c8b-4336-4e30-afea-5de7ca31117c

                                Second screenshot 5GB. transfer rate steady 10.5MB/s - 12MB/s
                                0_1451936786657_upload-26f6d6dd-c86b-44ee-9aaa-6e2598769d74

                                travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • travisdh1T
                                  travisdh1 @LAH3385
                                  last edited by

                                  @LAH3385 That's the sort of max transfer speed I'd expect out of a 100 megabit network. Something is probably not set or working right with the crossover connections.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • L
                                    LAH3385 @travisdh1
                                    last edited by

                                    @travisdh1
                                    Beside setting static ip address I did not do anything more than that. (aside from starwind vSAN)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      Thanks - and while these graphs might be useful, I was really hoping to see the ones you posted earlier, from Task Manager, showing each of the NICs.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • L
                                        LAH3385 @Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        @Dashrender
                                        it's a 10 minute transfer. The graph only shows a minute(?). Beside I think it should maxed out anyhow. Also, because I transfer the file across the network it doesn't utilize cross-over network.

                                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DashrenderD
                                          Dashrender @LAH3385
                                          last edited by

                                          @LAH3385 said:

                                          @Dashrender
                                          it's a 10 minute transfer. The graph only shows a minute(?). Beside I think it should maxed out anyhow. Also, because I transfer the file across the network it doesn't utilize cross-over network.

                                          it should use the cross over cable because the data should be replicated between the StarWinds vSAN, assuming the data is being written to a partition on that volume, which was where I thought your bottleneck might be.

                                          Also, as travishdh mentioned - is your switch a 100 Mb switch?

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • L
                                            LAH3385 @Dashrender
                                            last edited by

                                            @Dashrender

                                            I did not replicate file between the two cross-over servers. It is from a server to workstation.
                                            it's a gigabit switch.

                                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 3 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post