ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backblaze takes on Amazon S3 with dirt-cheap data storage for developers

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    12 Posts 5 Posters 1.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403
      last edited by

      That's an incredible price, I'm sending this up the chain. Might build that into our DR plan for offsite backup.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        My biggest concern for offsite backups is simply gaining access to the data in case of the backed up system's failure. How do you get access to the data?

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hubtechagain
          last edited by

          but you can't use backblaze on servers can you?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @hubtechagain
            last edited by

            @hubtechagain said:

            but you can't use backblaze on servers can you?

            I think you are thinking of the BackBlaze backup product. This is their S3 competitor and doesn't run "on" anything. It's a storage product.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
              last edited by

              @anonymous said:

              0.005 cents a gigabyte!

              http://thenextweb.com/apps/2015/09/22/backblaze-takes-on-amazon-s3-with-dirt-cheap-data-storage-for-developers/

              That's really quite an amazing price. Anything like ingress or egress costs to catch you like Glacier has?

              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said:

                My biggest concern for offsite backups is simply gaining access to the data in case of the backed up system's failure. How do you get access to the data?

                This isn't a backup product. This is a storage product. B2 is a direct competitor for S3. Even the name is similar.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by Alex Sage

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  That's really quite an amazing price. Anything like ingress or egress costs to catch you like Glacier has?

                  Free Upload. $0.05/GB Download

                  q-CGKpej0bK_sP1Uc_dk_su4QRHZwy9zQ3cplZlIkzk.jpeg

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                    last edited by

                    @anonymous said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    That's really quite an amazing price. Anything like ingress or egress costs to catch you like Glacier has?

                    Free Import / $0.05/GB Download

                    q-CGKpej0bK_sP1Uc_dk_su4QRHZwy9zQ3cplZlIkzk.jpeg

                    That makes it far more of a Glacier competitor than S3, I think.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      That makes it far more of a Glacier competitor than S3, I think.

                      No..... You can access you data instantly, and according to the article it is much cheaper then Glacier.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                        last edited by

                        @anonymous said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        That makes it far more of a Glacier competitor than S3, I think.

                        No..... You can access you data instantly, and according to the article it is much cheaper then Glacier.

                        $.05 per GB download isn't cheap for live storage usage.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          Glacier, for example, is $0.007 per GB to store and free to download and upload costs $.05 per 1,000 requests, which isn't too bad. You pay to store, not to recover, which is nice.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post