ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Virtualization Redemption?

    IT Discussion
    virtualization hyperv xenserver xen esxi storagecraft rsync unitrends drbd proxy drbd veeam
    13
    208
    143.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @hubtechagain
      last edited by

      @hubtechagain said:

      Currently we are running and will continue to run server 2008 R2. So Hyper-V would be 08r2 which i've heard nobody really likes.

      Why would them having 2008 R2 have any connection to the HyperV level? I feel like this has been covered several times but just keeps coming back. I can understand that they flatly refuse to update, but that's not what is stated. What is stated here doesn't mean anything, what Windows you have is not related to what HyperV you have.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • coliverC
        coliver
        last edited by

        Switch to Hyper-v and invest the money in the Veeam backup solution. They will save a lot of money in the long run.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hubtechagain
          last edited by

          so hyper v 2012 = hypervisor and is free?

          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Given the costs and the specific needs, I feel like XenServer and StorageCraft might be the most cost effective. All you have to license is the StorageCraft.

            coliverC StevenS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • coliverC
              coliver @hubtechagain
              last edited by

              @hubtechagain said:

              so hyper v 2012 = hypervisor and is free?

              Hyper-V 2012 R2. Is a hypervisor and like all hypervisors is free.

              DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • coliverC
                coliver @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                Given the costs and the specific needs, I feel like XenServer and StorageCraft might be the most cost effective. All you have to license is the StorageCraft.

                XenServer is awesome. I have never used StorageCraft but have seen them in the community, they seem to have a good product.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Because there are only three VMs to convert, I feel like the cost of conversion is likely to be very competitive (and in your favour personally because the money goes to you instead of to VMware, but that should not be a deciding factor, just one of those facts of consulting life) with licensing ESXi while providing many additional features and lowering low term risk. If it was a hundred tiny VMs, maybe the opposite. But three big ones, not much manual effort, hopefully.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    Veeam backs up to it's own file type - I don't think you can just load those files up on a new host and make them work like this scenario mentions.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @coliver
                      last edited by

                      @coliver said:

                      @hubtechagain said:

                      so hyper v 2012 = hypervisor and is free?

                      Hyper-V 2012 R2. Is a hypervisor and like all hypervisors is free.

                      Well, that's not quite right..

                      Sure ESXi has a free version, but that free version doesn't include the backup APIs, so it's not Apples to Apples.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @coliver
                        last edited by

                        @coliver said:

                        @hubtechagain said:

                        so hyper v 2012 = hypervisor and is free?

                        Hyper-V 2012 R2. Is a hypervisor and like all hypervisors is free.

                        It is important to note that this is all hypervisors on the market today. It's nothing intrinsic to hypervisors, just the market will not sustain a non-free hypervisor so the existence of one has not happened. In theory one could be non-free in the future, but unlikely.

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          Sure ESXi has a free version, but that free version doesn't include the backup APIs, so it's not Apples to Apples.

                          But the hypervisor itself is free, completely free. ALL of the virtualization is free. The backup API is a different animal and in no way makes the hypervisor less free by not existing.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @coliver said:

                            @hubtechagain said:

                            so hyper v 2012 = hypervisor and is free?

                            Hyper-V 2012 R2. Is a hypervisor and like all hypervisors is free.

                            It is important to note that this is all hypervisors on the market today. It's nothing intrinsic to hypervisors, just the market will not sustain a non-free hypervisor so the existence of one has not happened. In theory one could be non-free in the future, but unlikely.

                            Right, I didn't think I needed to clarify that, it is a good point though.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller Would StorageCraft in this case basically just sync his VM's from one client to another at a given point in time? I think that is real goal here. If the main site dies, Hub wants to connect to the VM host in the remote DC and just turn on the VMs there so they company is back on line.

                              scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Reid CooperR
                                Reid Cooper
                                last edited by

                                There is one option not mentioned here that I don't think is a good fit here but has to be mentioned because from a technical perspective I am pretty sure is the best option, but of the OP is not an expert on this probably is not something that he wants to learn on the customer's dime: DRBD Proxy.

                                DRBD is what makes XenServer able to do HA for free. DRBD Proxy is an add on for the storage layer that allows DRBD to natively handle the asynchronous replication to the DR site using nothing but the existing tools and technologies. No need for backup products or third party products at all. Everything can be handled by the Xen / Linux / DRBD stack for both the local as well as the remote site!

                                Still want backups, of course, but you can use any backup technology or product for that and do not need to worry about the replication piece. It would be an integrated cluster between the two sites.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  @scottalanmiller Would StorageCraft in this case basically just sync his VM's from one client to another at a given point in time? I think that is real goal here. If the main site dies, Hub wants to connect to the VM host in the remote DC and just turn on the VMs there so they company is back on line.

                                  Yes, it would be an incremental backup from one site to the other. As well as taking normal "on site" backups. It's a full backup utility.

                                  StevenS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • H
                                    hubtechagain
                                    last edited by

                                    Dash, you are 1000000% correct.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      @Dashrender said:

                                      @scottalanmiller Would StorageCraft in this case basically just sync his VM's from one client to another at a given point in time? I think that is real goal here. If the main site dies, Hub wants to connect to the VM host in the remote DC and just turn on the VMs there so they company is back on line.

                                      Yup, that would be the assumed design. If it is all on a VPN, for example, this gets really easy to do logistically.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        hubtechagain
                                        last edited by

                                        Network is a VPLS between sites so yeah, networking side isn't tough. technically it's all "LAN" to the hosts.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @hubtechagain
                                          last edited by

                                          @hubtechagain said:

                                          Network is a VPLS between sites so yeah, networking side isn't tough. technically it's all "LAN" to the hosts.

                                          That will work too. So that part is easy, just have to get the VMs over to the other site. Pretty much any backup tool will do it. Just need one that is automated and will do incrementals.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • H
                                            hubtechagain
                                            last edited by

                                            so my question is this. wont Xen do this for free? if i'm going to the "trouble" of switching hypervisors, why not go with one that includes the tools i need and client will be happy to not have to pay for licensing. now i dont know xen, but it can't be all that terrible to tinker with.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 7 / 11
                                            • First post
                                              Last post