ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Why There Is No Nutanix Review

    Reviews
    nutanix reviews virtualization hyperconvergence
    11
    36
    6.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mlnewsM
      mlnews
      last edited by

      A review of the review process for Nutanix shows why you might want to reconsider doing business with the company. Poor reviews followed by blocking reviewing to keep customers from seeing how their products perform.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
      • nadnerBN
        nadnerB
        last edited by

        Added to the list of dodgy cupcakes

        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by scottalanmiller

          Wait, it gets better. I mentioned this dodgy practice in another community where Nutanix advertises and guess what, Nutanix tried to get what I said about them altered or removed! They did the very thing they were accused of doing, more or less!

          They didn't, TTBOMK, pull any special strings, they just reported the post through their account person in the community and got the moderators to request it be modified, which it was.

          MattSpellerM nadnerBN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • MattSpellerM
            MattSpeller @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller thats delicious heheh

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • nadnerBN
              nadnerB @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Wait, it gets better. I mentioned this dodgy practice in another community where Nutanix advertises and guess what, Nutanix tried to get what I said about them altered or removed! They did the very thing they were accused of doing, more or less!

              They didn't, TTBOMK, pull any special strings, they just reported the post through their account person in the community and got the moderators to request it be modified, which is was.

              Rudeness.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • mlnewsM
                mlnews
                last edited by

                http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/07/nutanix_digs_itself_into_hole_and_refuses_to_drop_the_shovel/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Three years later, one sneaks out...

                  http://www.cultofanarchy.org/perfomance-test-nutanix-4-node-cluste/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    Well someone else has decided that Nutanix can piss off and posted a review..

                    http://www.cultofanarchy.org/perfomance-test-nutanix-4-node-cluste/

                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • momurdaM
                      momurda
                      last edited by

                      Got the gist but that font makes me head hurt.
                      I am positive typewriters were never that bad.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @momurda
                        last edited by

                        @momurda said in Why There Is No Nutanix Review:

                        Got the gist but that font makes me head hurt.
                        I am positive typewriters were never that bad.

                        But Nutanix apparently is.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403 @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @jaredbusch said in Why There Is No Nutanix Review:

                          Well someone else has decided that Nutanix can piss off and posted a review..

                          http://www.cultofanarchy.org/perfomance-test-nutanix-4-node-cluste/

                          "We could do Linux or FreeBSD or some other real operating system instead of Windows"

                          HAH!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • NashBrydgesN
                            NashBrydges
                            last edited by

                            This is quite an entertaining read for sure.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • NashBrydgesN
                              NashBrydges
                              last edited by

                              Saved the article to my Wallabag install before it disappears into the ether.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403
                                last edited by

                                So at the end of the article, they are saying data locality is really a horrible way to handle these kinds of systems. Which I think we all agree it is if you have a great network that can support the speeds your system is supporting.

                                @StarWind_Software to explain how StarWind vSAN can work around this issue.

                                https://www.starwindsoftware.com/data-locality-page

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                  last edited by

                                  @dustinb3403 said in Why There Is No Nutanix Review:

                                  So at the end of the article, they are saying data locality is really a horrible way to handle these kinds of systems. Which I think we all agree it is if you have a great network that can support the speeds your system is supporting.

                                  @StarWind_Software to explain how StarWind vSAN can work around this issue.

                                  https://www.starwindsoftware.com/data-locality-page

                                  Overall the article is good, I think, and Nutanix definitely has major issues and always has - I mean it is downright famous for being a flaming pile of "can't pull the cart". Most hyperconverged solutions struve to be the horse pulling the cart, Nutanix has always been happy being the stuff that the horse leaves behind on the road.

                                  But the issue here isn't data locality and shoud not be seen as that. Locality is really important and all the main vendors agree on this. Just because Nutanix does locality, and fails at other things, doesn't tell us that locality is bad, it just tells us that Nutanix screwed the pooch. It's physically impossible for distant data to compete with the speeds of local data, it is what it is. No matter how fast you make the interconnects, there will always be a benefit to having the main data reads be local.

                                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller the article states that even locally the performance was completely in the dumps. When the system was scaling it couldn't even reach the theoretical limits of what hardware as a whole should do.

                                    scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      "What’s interesting is however, pretty few companies maintain full local copies, most of the competitors prefer to chop the data into chunks and never keep single object as a whole."

                                      This is the part that is really misleading. THis statement is true, but we have to understand the context. Let's take Scale, for example. Unlike Starwind who forces data to be local under "normal" situations, Scale just "encourages" it to be local. It's not that Scale doesn't do data locality, they just are more loose with it.

                                      This is more an artefact of using RAIN instead of Network RAID. RAID, by definition, keeps full volumes together; RAIN has no such implication. RAIN is a broader topic, so not exactly apples to oranges. But with Starwind you could force all data to be non-local if you wanted, it's just that this is silly. With Scale, data might be non-local but will migrate to local for performance over time.

                                      Part of the difference is that Starwind's approach focuses on massive speed requiriing a little less "pooling". Scale's approach focuses more on "single pooling" with less focus on tightly controlled performance.

                                      THis means that with Starwind, for example, you will generally determine where your workloads run, not randomly migrate them around. But with Scale you will generally ignore where your workloads run and they will often move around on you.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        @dustinb3403 said in Why There Is No Nutanix Review:

                                        @scottalanmiller the article states that even locally the performance was completely in the dumps. When the system was scaling it couldn't even reach the theoretical limits of what hardware as a whole should do.

                                        Yes, the performance of Nutanix, the issue is Nutanix, not locality.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                          last edited by

                                          @dustinb3403 said in Why There Is No Nutanix Review:

                                          @scottalanmiller the article states that even locally the performance was completely in the dumps. When the system was scaling it couldn't even reach the theoretical limits of what hardware as a whole should do.

                                          Imagine buying a Ferrari and taking it out in LA in heavy traffic. Then complaining that your Ferrari never goes over 15MPH. The issue is that they chose the wrong road (Nutanix) to test their Ferrari (NVMe) on, not that locality (cars) aren't faster than walking. They never really tested locality vs .non-locality, they never used a product that could showcase it. All of that stuff is background noise compared to the trainwreck that is Nutanix.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • black3dynamiteB
                                            black3dynamite @nadnerB
                                            last edited by

                                            @nadnerb said in Why There Is No Nutanix Review:

                                            Added to the list of dodgy cupcakes

                                            New Tag: Dodgy Cupcakes

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post