ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech

    Water Closet
    reading
    72
    577
    158.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • KellyK
      Kelly @wirestyle22
      last edited by Kelly

      @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

      @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

      Well, you have Clarke's third law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

      wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • wirestyle22W
        wirestyle22 @Kelly
        last edited by wirestyle22

        @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

        @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

        @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

        Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

        I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game. If I do go with religion, which is the plan right now, I think the more cybernetic you are the more it shows your dedication

        KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • KellyK
          Kelly @wirestyle22
          last edited by

          @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

          @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

          @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

          @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

          Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

          I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

          Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

          KellyK wirestyle22W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KellyK
            Kelly @Kelly
            last edited by

            @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

            @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

            @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

            @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

            @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

            Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

            I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

            Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

            Going back to another L. E. Modesitt book, the Parafaith War, he has something happen like that except it is a person from a more advanced society using his implants to attack and subvert the systems in a church in order to alter their religion.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • wirestyle22W
              wirestyle22 @Kelly
              last edited by wirestyle22

              @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

              @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

              @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

              @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

              @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

              Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

              I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

              Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

              Yes but that's not exactly what I mean. Let's put it in D&D terms. If I cast fireball on you, it's a physical thing that hits an area. It's "real". In this game, it's not a physical thing unless I want to make it physical. It's kind a question of how I want to flavor magic within the game. Nothing about that would stop them from being able to hack systems and bring stuff down etc.

              KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KellyK
                Kelly @wirestyle22
                last edited by

                @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

                Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

                I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

                Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

                Yes but that's not exactly what I mean. Let's put it in D&D terms. If I cast fireball on you, it's a physical thing that hits an area. It's "real". In this game, it's not a physical thing unless I want to make it physical. It's kind a question of how I want to flavor magic within the game. Nothing about that would stop them from being able to hack systems and bring stuff down etc.

                I'm probably not getting a full picture of what you're going for, but it sounds like a narrative problem and not a mechanical one (at least not yet).

                Why would a cyber-athiest care about the magic of a digital world if they can just shoot one of the faithful? What level of separation are you thinking there would be between the digital and real? It is very hard to emphasize both. You can have a real world that impinges on the digital one (Ready Player One), or a digital one that impinges on the real (can't think of an example right off), but having both be as important as the other gets to be pretty hard to encompass within one game/story.

                Going back to how you can narratively establish cybernetics being able to extend magical powers, nanites are an incredibly useful means to make this happen. Cybermage casts fireball. Actually, he is expelling high speed nanites who fly at his target and create a brief plasma globe around the target and immolating themselves in the process.

                wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • wirestyle22W
                  wirestyle22 @Kelly
                  last edited by wirestyle22

                  @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                  @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                  @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                  @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                  @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                  @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                  @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

                  Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

                  I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

                  Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

                  Yes but that's not exactly what I mean. Let's put it in D&D terms. If I cast fireball on you, it's a physical thing that hits an area. It's "real". In this game, it's not a physical thing unless I want to make it physical. It's kind a question of how I want to flavor magic within the game. Nothing about that would stop them from being able to hack systems and bring stuff down etc.

                  I'm probably not getting a full picture of what you're going for, but it sounds like a narrative problem and not a mechanical one (at least not yet).

                  Why would a cyber-athiest care about the magic of a digital world if they can just shoot one of the faithful? What level of separation are you thinking there would be between the digital and real? It is very hard to emphasize both. You can have a real world that impinges on the digital one (Ready Player One), or a digital one that impinges on the real (can't think of an example right off), but having both be as important as the other gets to be pretty hard to encompass within one game/story.

                  Going back to how you can narratively establish cybernetics being able to extend magical powers, nanites are an incredibly useful means to make this happen. Cybermage casts fireball. Actually, he is expelling high speed nanites who fly at his target and create a brief plasma globe around the target and immolating themselves in the process.

                  It's not about them caring. It's sort of how an illusion may affect you (fear, reaction etc) but only if you can see it. If a normal human being has no way of interacting with that world then it has no effect on them.

                  Nanites are an interesting idea

                  KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KellyK
                    Kelly @wirestyle22
                    last edited by

                    @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                    @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

                    Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

                    I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

                    Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

                    Yes but that's not exactly what I mean. Let's put it in D&D terms. If I cast fireball on you, it's a physical thing that hits an area. It's "real". In this game, it's not a physical thing unless I want to make it physical. It's kind a question of how I want to flavor magic within the game. Nothing about that would stop them from being able to hack systems and bring stuff down etc.

                    I'm probably not getting a full picture of what you're going for, but it sounds like a narrative problem and not a mechanical one (at least not yet).

                    Why would a cyber-athiest care about the magic of a digital world if they can just shoot one of the faithful? What level of separation are you thinking there would be between the digital and real? It is very hard to emphasize both. You can have a real world that impinges on the digital one (Ready Player One), or a digital one that impinges on the real (can't think of an example right off), but having both be as important as the other gets to be pretty hard to encompass within one game/story.

                    Going back to how you can narratively establish cybernetics being able to extend magical powers, nanites are an incredibly useful means to make this happen. Cybermage casts fireball. Actually, he is expelling high speed nanites who fly at his target and create a brief plasma globe around the target and immolating themselves in the process.

                    It's not about them caring. It's sort of how an illusion may affect you (fear, reaction etc) but only if you can see it. If a normal human being has no way of interacting with that world then it has no effect on them.

                    Nanites are an interesting idea

                    Pheromones and hypersonics can induce hallucinations (illusions).

                    wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • wirestyle22W
                      wirestyle22 @Kelly
                      last edited by wirestyle22

                      @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @kelly said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                      @kelly I want to add in some interesting mini-games that are not necessary but benefit you a lot in the game. Like hacking corporations in a netrunner inspired hacking simulation. The asset you access can be sold, creating side quests that can go well or very poorly depending. Stuff like that

                      Well, you have Clarke's first law to lean on. All you have to do then is clothe the character's technical actions in religious trappings and it becomes a mystical act in character. I'm not sure what you mean by a person without enhancements. Would they not be able to jack in then, or is the level of a person's "holiness" measured by the number of cybernetics they sport?

                      I meant if "magic" is only manifested inside of this digital world humans created, it stands to reason that a person that is normal, ie un-upgraded/zero enhacements would be completely unaffected by it. This creates problems mechanically within the game

                      Why does it have to only manifest in the digital world? If a person has the implants to transfer their consciousness to a digital world wouldn't they also have the capabilities to affect systems in the real world? Or, if they don't "jack in" or are digital athiests they could still have the means (perhaps not cybernetic) to alter external systems. E.g. shutdown security systems, overload power conduits, etc.

                      Yes but that's not exactly what I mean. Let's put it in D&D terms. If I cast fireball on you, it's a physical thing that hits an area. It's "real". In this game, it's not a physical thing unless I want to make it physical. It's kind a question of how I want to flavor magic within the game. Nothing about that would stop them from being able to hack systems and bring stuff down etc.

                      I'm probably not getting a full picture of what you're going for, but it sounds like a narrative problem and not a mechanical one (at least not yet).

                      Why would a cyber-athiest care about the magic of a digital world if they can just shoot one of the faithful? What level of separation are you thinking there would be between the digital and real? It is very hard to emphasize both. You can have a real world that impinges on the digital one (Ready Player One), or a digital one that impinges on the real (can't think of an example right off), but having both be as important as the other gets to be pretty hard to encompass within one game/story.

                      Going back to how you can narratively establish cybernetics being able to extend magical powers, nanites are an incredibly useful means to make this happen. Cybermage casts fireball. Actually, he is expelling high speed nanites who fly at his target and create a brief plasma globe around the target and immolating themselves in the process.

                      It's not about them caring. It's sort of how an illusion may affect you (fear, reaction etc) but only if you can see it. If a normal human being has no way of interacting with that world then it has no effect on them.

                      Nanites are an interesting idea

                      Pheromones and hypersonics can induce hallucinations (illusions).

                      I'll read up on it. I don't think I need to explain every little detail, but I like reading about this stuff because it gives me some inspiration. Thanks!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • NDCN
                        NDC
                        last edited by NDC

                        @wirestyle22

                        So it sounds like you are maybe looking for recs mostly in the cyberpunk field but probably not exclusively.

                        If you haven't read any Gibson you should do it post haste.

                        I think something like the Marid Audran novels starting with When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger would also be excellent for you.

                        For something (relatively) recent and super cool but not cyberpunk check out Folding Beijing by Hao Jingfang. Not exactly SF or Fantasy, but has some great stuff going on.

                        Edited to add: Lady of Mazes by Karl Schroeder would also be an excellent addition to your list. It is more straight SF but has some really excellent takes on how augmentation might play out.

                        KellyK wirestyle22W travisdh1T 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • KellyK
                          Kelly @NDC
                          last edited by

                          @ndc said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                          @wirestyle22

                          So it sounds like you are maybe looking for recs mostly in the cyberpunk field but probably not exclusively.

                          If you haven't read any Gibson you should do it post haste.

                          I think something like the Marid Audran novels starting with When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger would also be excellent for you.

                          For something (relatively) recent and super cool but not cyberpunk check out Folding Beijing by Hao Jingfang. Not exactly SF or Fantasy, but has some great stuff going on.

                          You mentioning Gibson reminded me of Gordon R. Dickson. Not exactly the same, but in it there are human subspecies that have developed their mental powers to the point that it is much like magic. I need to reread those too...

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • wirestyle22W
                            wirestyle22 @NDC
                            last edited by

                            @ndc said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                            @wirestyle22

                            So it sounds like you are maybe looking for recs mostly in the cyberpunk field but probably not exclusively.

                            If you haven't read any Gibson you should do it post haste.

                            I think something like the Marid Audran novels starting with When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger would also be excellent for you.

                            For something (relatively) recent and super cool but not cyberpunk check out Folding Beijing by Hao Jingfang. Not exactly SF or Fantasy, but has some great stuff going on.

                            Edited to add: Lady of Mazes by Karl Schroeder would also be an excellent addition to your list. It is more straight SF but has some really excellent takes on how augmentation might play out.

                            I've read neuromancer

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • travisdh1T
                              travisdh1 @NDC
                              last edited by

                              @ndc said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                              @wirestyle22

                              So it sounds like you are maybe looking for recs mostly in the cyberpunk field but probably not exclusively.

                              If you haven't read any Gibson you should do it post haste.

                              I think something like the Marid Audran novels starting with When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger would also be excellent for you.

                              For something (relatively) recent and super cool but not cyberpunk check out Folding Beijing by Hao Jingfang. Not exactly SF or Fantasy, but has some great stuff going on.

                              Edited to add: Lady of Mazes by Karl Schroeder would also be an excellent addition to your list. It is more straight SF but has some really excellent takes on how augmentation might play out.

                              You're reminding me of how long it's been since I've ready Isaac Asimov's stuff. I need to pick up digital versions of the robot series'.

                              jmooreJ NDCN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jmooreJ
                                jmoore @travisdh1
                                last edited by

                                @travisdh1 Good stuff

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • NDCN
                                  NDC @travisdh1
                                  last edited by

                                  @travisdh1 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                                  @ndc said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                                  @wirestyle22

                                  So it sounds like you are maybe looking for recs mostly in the cyberpunk field but probably not exclusively.

                                  If you haven't read any Gibson you should do it post haste.

                                  I think something like the Marid Audran novels starting with When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger would also be excellent for you.

                                  For something (relatively) recent and super cool but not cyberpunk check out Folding Beijing by Hao Jingfang. Not exactly SF or Fantasy, but has some great stuff going on.

                                  Edited to add: Lady of Mazes by Karl Schroeder would also be an excellent addition to your list. It is more straight SF but has some really excellent takes on how augmentation might play out.

                                  You're reminding me of how long it's been since I've ready Isaac Asimov's stuff. I need to pick up digital versions of the robot series'.

                                  When @wirestyle22 first asked for recommendations of SF/Fantasy cross over stuff I had thought about suggesting Childhood's End due to he heavy use of psychic powers but I don't think it's really where he's headed. Good stuff though and worth a read.

                                  wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • wirestyle22W
                                    wirestyle22 @NDC
                                    last edited by

                                    @ndc said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                                    @travisdh1 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                                    @ndc said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                                    @wirestyle22

                                    So it sounds like you are maybe looking for recs mostly in the cyberpunk field but probably not exclusively.

                                    If you haven't read any Gibson you should do it post haste.

                                    I think something like the Marid Audran novels starting with When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger would also be excellent for you.

                                    For something (relatively) recent and super cool but not cyberpunk check out Folding Beijing by Hao Jingfang. Not exactly SF or Fantasy, but has some great stuff going on.

                                    Edited to add: Lady of Mazes by Karl Schroeder would also be an excellent addition to your list. It is more straight SF but has some really excellent takes on how augmentation might play out.

                                    You're reminding me of how long it's been since I've ready Isaac Asimov's stuff. I need to pick up digital versions of the robot series'.

                                    When @wirestyle22 first asked for recommendations of SF/Fantasy cross over stuff I had thought about suggesting Childhood's End due to he heavy use of psychic powers but I don't think it's really where he's headed. Good stuff though and worth a read.

                                    I'm open to anything really. Trying to see how other people have done it successfully

                                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403 @wirestyle22
                                      last edited by

                                      @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Currently Reading Outside of Tech:

                                      I'm open to anything really. Trying to see how other people have done it successfully

                                      Out of context this could mean so many things. . .

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        This is a good book series I've been reading.

                                        https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/8894/everybody-loves-large-chests

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          I started reading Steinbeck's East of Eden last night.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • NDCN
                                            NDC
                                            last edited by

                                            I really need to get my Calibre library back up and running. Just finished the Fifth Season by NK Jemisin and I'm fairly certain the sequels are already in there. They definitely need to find their way onto my phone!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 20
                                            • 21
                                            • 22
                                            • 23
                                            • 24
                                            • 28
                                            • 29
                                            • 22 / 29
                                            • First post
                                              Last post