ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VoIP One-way Audio and Voice drops

    IT Discussion
    voip freepbx meraki sip
    9
    215
    119.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch
      last edited by

      His ISP is the SIP trunk provider for the main SIP service.

      He setup a SIP trunk to another provider and experienced the same issues.

      With all of the testing done to date, the problem is the ISP based on what we know so far.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @FiyaFly
        last edited by JaredBusch

        @FiyaFly said:

        On a side note, what is your PBX running in? I once tried running in Hyper-V and ran into a slew of problems with load and the NIC drivers.

        Related: Hyper-V has NIC issues if you do not disabled VMQ on the VM unless the hardware supports it correctly. I have a client with Hyper-V 2012 R2 and a ton of NIC issues were going on until I disabled VMQ.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • coliverC
          coliver @FiyaFly
          last edited by

          @FiyaFly said:

          @coliver it is relatively easy to set STUN up on a phone at least and test that part.

          On a side note, what is your PBX running in? I once tried running in Hyper-V and ran into a slew of problems with load and the NIC drivers.

          It is running on Hyper-V. Up until this point it hasn't been an issue.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @coliver
            last edited by

            @coliver said:

            It is running on Hyper-V. Up until this point it hasn't been an issue.

            Unlikely having VM related issues, but they are worth mentioning. The Hyper-V server was not updated lately was it?

            coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • coliverC
              coliver @JaredBusch
              last edited by coliver

              @JaredBusch said:

              @coliver said:

              It is running on Hyper-V. Up until this point it hasn't been an issue.

              Unlikely having VM related issues, but they are worth mentioning. The Hyper-V server was not updated lately was it?

              I don't think so but I'm going to look into it now, I've looked before but didn't notice anything. I've noticed something odd, the PBX server has some serious packet loss to the SIP trunk whereas my desktop does not... they are both on the same switch. This still doesn't explain the issues I was having with the other SIP trunk but it may have something to do with the current issues.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • dafyreD
                dafyre
                last edited by

                @coliver have you checked to see if the NICs in your Hyper-V server actually have VMQ enabled or not?

                In Powershell (assuming Server 2012 / R2) try

                get-netadapter-vmq

                coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @JaredBusch said:

                  His ISP is the SIP trunk provider for the main SIP service.

                  He setup a SIP trunk to another provider and experienced the same issues.

                  With all of the testing done to date, the problem is the ISP based on what we know so far.

                  Gotcha. Yes, that makes sense. I missed that the ISP and SIP trunk was the same provider.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    I've seen a lot of issues from those "ISP as SIP trunk providers." Those seem to always be the ones that are willing to have things fail because they have good lock-in.

                    If you can test the third party SIP provider from home, for example, with the same setup (a bit of work) that would prove a lot.

                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @dafyre
                      last edited by

                      @dafyre said:

                      @coliver have you checked to see if the NICs in your Hyper-V server actually have VMQ enabled or not?

                      In Powershell (assuming Server 2012 / R2) try

                      get-netadapter-vmq

                      2015-06-02 15_05_29-Windows PowerShell.png

                      The Hyper-V team was the original network adapter that this was on. Since starting with these issues I have moved that over to a dedicated port Ethernet 2.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre
                        last edited by

                        Have you considered disabling VMQ ?

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by coliver

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          I've seen a lot of issues from those "ISP as SIP trunk providers." Those seem to always be the ones that are willing to have things fail because they have good lock-in.

                          If you can test the third party SIP provider from home, for example, with the same setup (a bit of work) that would prove a lot.

                          I will bring my phone (the one attached to the Vitelity trunk) home and test it out there. I use a different ISP at my house. Or maybe I should bring it down to my parents who have the same ISP that would allow me to test that out the same network at least.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @dafyre
                            last edited by

                            @dafyre said:

                            Have you considered disabling VMQ ?

                            I have not, does VMQ often have issues?

                            dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • coliverC
                              coliver
                              last edited by coliver

                              I do get this error: Networking driver in PBX loaded but has a different version from the server. Server version 4.0 Client version 3.2 (Virtual machine ID 82638176-8888-46C2-8FF4-6182BA79215C). The device will work, but this is an unsupported configuration. This means that technical support will not be provided until this problem is resolved. To fix this problem, upgrade the integration services. To upgrade, connect to the virtual machine and select Insert Integration Services Setup Disk from the Action menu.

                              But from what I've read this shouldn't cause any issues with actual connectivity.

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @coliver
                                last edited by

                                @coliver said:

                                I do get this error: Networking driver in PBX loaded but has a different version from the server. Server version 4.0 Client version 3.2 (Virtual machine ID 82638176-8888-46C2-8FF4-6182BA79215C). The device will work, but this is an unsupported configuration. This means that technical support will not be provided until this problem is resolved. To fix this problem, upgrade the integration services. To upgrade, connect to the virtual machine and select Insert Integration Services Setup Disk from the Action menu.

                                But from what I've read this shouldn't cause any issues with actual connectivity.

                                Likely means it's suffering performance hit as the NIC might not be fully virtualized.

                                coliverC DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • coliverC
                                  coliver @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                                  @coliver said:

                                  I do get this error: Networking driver in PBX loaded but has a different version from the server. Server version 4.0 Client version 3.2 (Virtual machine ID 82638176-8888-46C2-8FF4-6182BA79215C). The device will work, but this is an unsupported configuration. This means that technical support will not be provided until this problem is resolved. To fix this problem, upgrade the integration services. To upgrade, connect to the virtual machine and select Insert Integration Services Setup Disk from the Action menu.

                                  But from what I've read this shouldn't cause any issues with actual connectivity.

                                  Likely means it's suffering performance hit as the NIC might not be fully virtualized.

                                  Ok, I will see if there is an update available for that version of Linux.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DashrenderD
                                    Dashrender @A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    @thecreativeone91 said:

                                    @coliver said:

                                    I do get this error: Networking driver in PBX loaded but has a different version from the server. Server version 4.0 Client version 3.2 (Virtual machine ID 82638176-8888-46C2-8FF4-6182BA79215C). The device will work, but this is an unsupported configuration. This means that technical support will not be provided until this problem is resolved. To fix this problem, upgrade the integration services. To upgrade, connect to the virtual machine and select Insert Integration Services Setup Disk from the Action menu.

                                    But from what I've read this shouldn't cause any issues with actual connectivity.

                                    Likely means it's suffering performance hit as the NIC might not be fully virtualized.

                                    yeah, I would say this could be your whole problem (only the fact that SIP directly to a phone still had the same problem tells us it's not this error that's likely the problem).

                                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • dafyreD
                                      dafyre @coliver
                                      last edited by dafyre

                                      @coliver I have read that a lot of NIC drivers do the VMQ implementation poorly in drivers which can kill performance, so I usually disable it, just to be safe. Most notably, this problem is especially prevalent on the Broadcom chipsets... I see you have intel.

                                      It may be worth a shot, but there will be a brief blip if you use the powershell command to disable VMQ.

                                      get-help VMQ

                                      will list the commands.

                                      get-netadaptervmq|where {$_.Name -eq 'NIC1'}|disable-netadaptervmq

                                      Just replace NIC1 with whichever NIC is currently running your PBX VM.

                                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @dafyre
                                        last edited by

                                        @dafyre said:

                                        @coliver I have read that a lot of NIC drivers do the VMQ implementation poorly in drivers which can kill performance, so I usually disable it, just to be safe. Most notably, this problem is especially prevalent on the Broadcom chipsets... I see you have intel.

                                        This was the issue I had. Poor performance. and it was a Dell server with Braodcom chipset.

                                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • JaredBuschJ
                                          JaredBusch @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said:

                                          yeah, I would say this could be your whole problem (only the fact that SIP directly to a phone still had the same problem tells us it's not this error that's likely the problem).

                                          His VM is not the problem because a PHONE with the credentials directly entered has the same problem.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender
                                            last edited by

                                            lol maybe the brackets around the second part of my statement made it invisible? lol

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 5 / 11
                                            • First post
                                              Last post