Size of MSPs
-
@scottalanmiller said:
In theory, you do not get advice from an MSP. Their business models make them function like VARs in that case. The very design of an MSP organization puts them at odds with giving general IT advice.
In theory. Most do.
-
@Breffni-Potter said:
I'd love that backlash against vendor focused providers but...Not seeing it happening.
Businesses love and are addicted to what they see as free consulting. The MSP / VAR model is so easy to sell. If you don't understand IT, you would never understand why you would want something else.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Breffni-Potter said:
I'd love that backlash against vendor focused providers but...Not seeing it happening.
Businesses love and are addicted to what they see as free consulting. The MSP / VAR model is so easy to sell. If you don't understand IT, you would never understand why you would want something else.
This. This times 1000. I'd say a close second is companies who give kickbacks to those who have purchasing power, like the example @scottalanmiller gave me one time where a company sells someone a phone system and gives the people buying the system (or advising to buy it) a week of free training, in Bermuda. Case in point.
-
@nadnerB said:
All the MSP's I know of have at least 20 employees.
Until SW, the two I knew of were the same way.
-
@Dashrender said:
@nadnerB said:
All the MSP's I know of have at least 20 employees.
Until SW, the two I knew of were the same way.
That's because big ones are going to be the ones that you know. The average company is tiny, just a few people, but the average company that you know is huge (Microsoft, Apple, etc.) What ones you know is misleading towards few, large companies.
-
In my early days, I only knew tiny MSPs. Normally one or two people. Saw my first 10+ firms only after running into them at trade shows. But at the same shows ran into one person shops too.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@nadnerB said:
All the MSP's I know of have at least 20 employees.
Until SW, the two I knew of were the same way.
That's because big ones are going to be the ones that you know. The average company is tiny, just a few people, but the average company that you know is huge (Microsoft, Apple, etc.) What ones you know is misleading towards few, large companies.
You're absolutely right! SW has definitely opened my eyes to the TONS of micro businesses that are out there.
-
That's not one I learned from there before anyone points out that only small businesses use SW. The US maintains the size records of every company in the country and the numbers are staggering. The average business is tiny and most fail in the first few years. Very few make money. The numbers are so different than what anyone would imagine.
-
One thing that I learned from SW is just how many MSPs are the same people at different businesses. I know of one person who has their own one man part time MSP, plus is part of a three man part time MSP, is part time with a larger full time MSP and might do a few other things. He alone accounts for two of his own MSP businesses. They are real businesses, just not real big.
What I never knew was just how many IT pros were running tiny MSPs on the side. It seems like it is almost an expected side business of every one man IT shop by day to run a part time MSP by night.
-
We currently have 16 employees, and we've had between 14 and 16 since I bought the business 8 years ago. Holy cow, has it been that long? Now I'm depressed that it hasn't become more successful.
-
Some people on here seem to define MSP differently to Wikipedia. I'm not really clear (or really care) what the official definition is (there probably isn't one), so from now on I wont talk about MSPs since I may confuse people as to what kind of company I'm talking about.
All I'll say is, the vendors I use for IT help employ between 15 and 3,000 people. They may offer managed services, and they have a page on their website that is specifically about managed services, but that isn't all they do, so I won't call them an MSP. I pay them in different ways - from hourly billing, to fixed cost projects, to cost per annum.
-
@tonyshowoff said:
We currently have 16 employees, and we've had between 14 and 16 since I bought the business 8 years ago. Holy cow, has it been that long? Now I'm depressed that it hasn't become more successful.
Yeah, you should really be on a beach in the Bahamas by now, following a successful IPO.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
@tonyshowoff said:
We currently have 16 employees, and we've had between 14 and 16 since I bought the business 8 years ago. Holy cow, has it been that long? Now I'm depressed that it hasn't become more successful.
Yeah, you should really be on a beach in the Bahamas by now, following a successful IPO.
Actually for the last two years or so my father in law has been trying to convince me to go public, for some reason, but that's not ideal for all sorts of reasons.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
All I'll say is, the vendors I use for IT help employ between 15 and 3,000 people. They may offer managed services, and they have a page on their website that is specifically about managed services, but that isn't all they do, so I won't call them an MSP. I pay them in different ways - from hourly billing, to fixed cost projects, to cost per annum.
Didn't we determine in the past that you primarily use the MSP / VAR models? The people you work with, while selling you services, also sell you product?
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
Some people on here seem to define MSP differently to Wikipedia.
Don't believe that there is anything official. But the term "managed services" is the tip off. People who don't do managed services feel strange using the term as it doesn't reflect what they do in any way. An MSP should be a "provider of managed services."
Lots of firms do a mix of things. NTG will do MSP work if requested, but we don't push it. MSP firms will normally do something else if the price is right. MSPs nearly always mix in VAR work. VARs often offer MSP services.
Sadly, because MSP has become the word that non-technical people use, everyone has had to start using it to refer to themselves even when they know that they are not.
