Replacement for CloudatCost
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
Plex handles the streaming of media, whether that be audio or video. For larger videos, it can be quite system intensive.
It shouldn't be server side. Are you pre-transcoding your files? other wise it has to transcode everytime you play it. If you transcode everything before you put in on the server 512MB-1GB would be more than enough.
Also the database might just be ballooning to fill up as much ram as you give it.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
My web server is usually using 2-3GB of RAM at least. I'm pretty sure it's due to the caching.
Why would you need 8GB then?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
My web server is usually using 2-3GB of RAM at least. I'm pretty sure it's due to the caching.
Why would you need 8GB then?
That'd be for Plex. Or I might be able to make Plex and my web server work on the same VM. But I think that could cause some issues.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
Plex handles the streaming of media, whether that be audio or video. For larger videos, it can be quite system intensive.
It shouldn't be server side. Are you pre-transcoding your files? other wise it has to transcode everytime you play it. If you transcode everything before you put in on the server 512MB-1GB would be more than enough.
Also the database might just be ballooning to fill up as much ram as you give it.
How would I pre-transcode them? I'm not sure what you mean by that...
-
Host your own boxes if you need that kind of hardware. Still better uptime than CloudatCost
-
Plex transcodes the original media on the fly if you don't have them in the format for the device you are watching from: https://support.plex.tv/hc/en-us/articles/200250377-Transcoding-Media. Direct Play uses almost no resource, DirectStream uses a bit. Transcoding uses a lot of resources.
-
@IRJ said:
Host your own boxes if you need that kind of hardware. Still better uptime than CloudatCost
True dat...
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
Plex transcodes the original media on the fly if you don't have them in the format for the device you are watching from: https://support.plex.tv/hc/en-us/articles/200250377-Transcoding-Media. Direct Play uses almost no resource, DirectStream uses a bit. Transcoding uses a lot of resources.
My movies are mostly .avi and my TV shows are mostly .mkv and .mp4. The majority are .mkv.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
My movies are mostly .avi and my TV shows are mostly .mkv and .mp4. The majority are .mkv.
Those are containers, not codec formats. Doesn't really mean much.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
My movies are mostly .avi and my TV shows are mostly .mkv and .mp4. The majority are .mkv.
Do you legally own any of them?
-
@Aaron-Studer said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
My movies are mostly .avi and my TV shows are mostly .mkv and .mp4. The majority are .mkv.
Do you legally own any of them?
Yes.
-
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
-
@g.jacobse said:
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
I host the files locally and connect the shares to the remote server.
-
@g.jacobse said:
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
Most of my collection isn't movies though. It's mostly TV shows.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@g.jacobse said:
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
I host the files locally and connect the shares to the remote server.
What's the point of that? Just put the server locally.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@g.jacobse said:
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
I host the files locally and connect the shares to the remote server.
What's the point of that? Just put the server locally.
I have one locally. The problem is I don't have the resources to provision the local Plex server the way I want.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
I have one locally. The problem is I don't have the resources to provision the local Plex server the way I want.
You are just making the connection between the VPS/cloud server and your file shares the limitation with that setup. I mean you could get a free desktop of craigslist to do plex. It doesn't need to be very powerful.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
I have one locally. The problem is I don't have the resources to provision the local Plex server the way I want.
You are just making the connection between the VPS/cloud server and your file shares the limitation with that setup. I mean you could get a free desktop of craigslist to do plex. It doesn't need to be very powerful.
I've got another server already. It's a Dell Poweredge I got from @PSX_Defector. I just need to get it setup...
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@g.jacobse said:
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
Most of my collection isn't movies though. It's mostly TV shows.
Does that mean that you watch them regularly rather than rarely?
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@g.jacobse said:
Better Understanding....
AJ - Just for my own understanding - why upload movies to a remote site / server? I watch a movie once,.. and put it away.. Even with my Netflix account, I watch, and move on.
What is the benefit of taking a movie you own on DVD / Blue Ray, ripping it,.. uploading it to a hosted server, so you can watch it later.
You can build / buy your own wireless cloud device, rip local, and seemingly would be faster and more reliable. Hosting it on a server 3,000 miles away (and with CloudatCost; in another country most likely) seems resource intensive.
I host the files locally and connect the shares to the remote server.
What's the purpose of the remote piece? Just to expose to non-home locations?
