ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    GPO's for System Hardening

    IT Discussion
    7
    18
    1.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PhlipElderP
      PhlipElder @ElecEng
      last edited by PhlipElder

      @eleceng said in GPO's for System Hardening:

      What are some standard GPO's to put in place for god management and system hardening?

      Don't have any printers on this network BTW

      First place to start is with a Privileged Access Workstation structure as far as management.

      Use a PAW whether server or desktop.

      Hammer Windows Firewall down on server operating systems for services being served making sure that RDP and any other management protocols are allowed between servers and the PAW/Jump Server.

      Use an OU and disposable VMs for testing. I highly suggest not mucking about with GPOs that apply to production OUs that have AD User and Computer Objects.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ObsolesceO
        Obsolesce
        last edited by

        A hardened system doesn't use ADDS and Windows.

        PhlipElderP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • PhlipElderP
          PhlipElder @Obsolesce
          last edited by PhlipElder

          @obsolesce said in GPO's for System Hardening:

          A hardened system doesn't use ADDS and Windows.

          The subject says "GPO's ... "?

          GPO = Group Policy Object

          GPOs are linked to OUs.

          OU = Organization Unit

          Jeremy Moskowitz is one of the preeminent Group Policy folks in the world. One of the best to learn from. His books a really, really good.

          ADDS and Group Policy are still very much relevant today.

          EDIT: PAW is not a part of the production domain. It's either workgroup or in a separate AD Forest (Host/Tenant type of AD structure).

          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @ElecEng
            last edited by

            Don't have any printers on this network BTW

            What weird place do you work? I want to work there!

            EddieJenningsE E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • EddieJenningsE
              EddieJennings @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @dashrender said in GPO's for System Hardening:

              Don't have any printers on this network BTW

              What weird place do you work? I want to work there!

              This. 100% this :P.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @PhlipElder
                last edited by

                @phlipelder said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                EDIT: PAW is not a part of the production domain. It's either workgroup or in a separate AD Forest (Host/Tenant type of AD structure).

                What do you mean?

                PhlipElderP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • PhlipElderP
                  PhlipElder @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @dashrender said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                  @phlipelder said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                  EDIT: PAW is not a part of the production domain. It's either workgroup or in a separate AD Forest (Host/Tenant type of AD structure).

                  What do you mean?

                  PAW: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-center-security/privileged-access-workstation-paw/ba-p/372274

                  We treat all production environments as hostile now.

                  So, when we deploy a new cluster it goes into its own AD Forest with its own DCs running at the local level on a couple of cluster nodes (Hyper-V).

                  A dedicated PAW or Jump Server could be set up in that AD Forest.

                  Otherwise, it should be in a workgroup and have 2FA/MFA set up.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    ElecEng @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @dashrender It is a manufacturing network for equipment comms, etc. Printers are on the corporate network but both networks are isolated from each other. Very common.

                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @ElecEng
                      last edited by

                      @eleceng said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                      Very common.

                      Sadly not.

                      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • E
                        ElecEng @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @jaredbusch That is the correct way and the way it's done in most manufacturing plants in the U.S. and International. That has been best practice for the last 25-30 years. I am in 8-10 different manufacturing plants [per week as a consultant and that's how it done.

                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @ElecEng
                          last edited by

                          @eleceng said in GPO's for System Hardening:

                          @jaredbusch That is the correct way and the way it's done in most manufacturing plants in the U.S. and International. That has been best practice for the last 25-30 years. I am in 8-10 different manufacturing plants [per week as a consultant and that's how it done.

                          That's awesome that the plants you work for do it that way - but I agree with JB - it's likely not that common in reality.

                          Hell - the sure number of SCADA systems on the internet in mind boggling.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post