ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Reconsidering ProxMox

    IT Discussion
    kvm lxc proxmox
    32
    241
    33.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      For those not aware, ProxMox is a virtualization platform that basically layers a software appliance with a web GUI (and a REST API) on top of KVM, LXC, DRBD, CEPH, ZFS and lots of other features and provides an all in one virtualization platform that includes backups and high availability all in a single, open source package.

      A number of years ago, probably close to a decade, when ProxMox first came onto a lot of our radar, we had some pretty nasty run ins with the company behind it with using employees to do fake review posts and the company got really nasty when they got caught doing this with the owner joining the community just to harass and threaten people.

      It's been many years of things being quiet, and while the behaviour was bad, everyone has a bad day (or week.) No similar problems have arisen in the years since and the product is open source and does not require that you engage the vendor for anything.

      With time having passed, is it time to give them a second chance? The project contains so many cool features and things you rarely find on the KVM and LXC platforms, does it make sense to give it another go?

      What experiences have people had? People using ProxMox seem mostly pretty happy with it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        While waiting on responses, we are deploying it to a test server to see how the latest 6.1 is stacking up.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jt1001001J
          jt1001001
          last edited by

          Seen a lot of people on Reddit who love it. Myself I tried it maybe 3-4 months ago for giggles and felt too removed from the core OS/KVM to really lean anything. I am more in a learning phase so decided to pass for now.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • brandon220B
            brandon220
            last edited by

            I tried it out about a year ago albeit very briefly. Wanted to actually put some effort into it but had to use the host for another project.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stacksofplatesS
              stacksofplates
              last edited by

              It's been a long time since I used it (like 2014) but it worked really well back then. I do more with containers now so I haven't looked into using it at home.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @jt1001001
                last edited by

                @jt1001001 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                Seen a lot of people on Reddit who love it. Myself I tried it maybe 3-4 months ago for giggles and felt too removed from the core OS/KVM to really lean anything. I am more in a learning phase so decided to pass for now.

                I'm specifically evaluating for deployments primarily in small SMBs managed remotely by MSPs. So nothing intensive, but places where the built in backups and web interface are huge features.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • brandon220B
                  brandon220
                  last edited by

                  The built-in backup feature was the main reason I was interested.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    Proxmox VE backups are always full backups

                    That seems annoying. . .

                    V scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • V
                      VoIP_n00b @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @DustinB3403 you seem annoying

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -3
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @VoIP_n00b
                        last edited by

                        @VoIP_n00b said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                        @DustinB3403 you seem annoying

                        Only have full backups, while functional is a limitation. I know of many places that can't wait minutes - hours at a time for a backup to operate so CR style backups are a must.

                        Also fuck you @VoIP_n00b starting with the personal attacks.

                        V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • V
                          VoIP_n00b @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                          Also fuck you @VoIP_n00b starting with the personal attacks.

                          Love you too

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -2
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                            last edited by scottalanmiller

                            @DustinB3403 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                            Proxmox VE backups are always full backups

                            That seems annoying. . .

                            Not ideal, but with compression and dedupe, not the problem it seems to be. And it is far less risky that continuous partials that always depend on rehydration.

                            V S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • V
                              VoIP_n00b @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                              Not ideal, but with compression and dedupe, not the problem it seems to be. And it is far less risky that continuous partials that always depend on rehydration.

                              ๐Ÿ‘

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -2
                              • V
                                VoIP_n00b
                                last edited by

                                Also, it's "Proxmox" no uppercase M

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -2
                                • black3dynamiteB
                                  black3dynamite
                                  last edited by

                                  I always like how you can setup permissions for users, groups, pools and roles. Also use different servers for authentication.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • black3dynamiteB
                                    black3dynamite
                                    last edited by

                                    During the Proxmox installation, itโ€™s nice to options for file system like ext4, xfs and zfs if you are into zfs.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • black3dynamiteB
                                      black3dynamite
                                      last edited by

                                      Having the option to enable Two Factor Authentication is plus if the WebUI is accessible from a public IP.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • G
                                        gtech
                                        last edited by

                                        Proxmox is great been using it for a couple of years with little to no issues. The new Ceph wizard makes setting up Ceph quick and easy. It has Incremental backups but I prefer to just replicate VM to another node.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • F
                                          FrankenGeek
                                          last edited by

                                          I'm a SMB and been using it in production for 7 years. 40 VM's with a 3 node cluster. NFS backed - yeah I know IPD lol. Looking to fix that soon but it's been rock solid.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • CloudKnightC
                                            CloudKnight
                                            last edited by

                                            I use proxmox as well, I like it.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 1 / 13
                                            • First post
                                              Last post