Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
I'm wondering if I should consider a Teams solution instead of a typical deskphone solution
So here is my question... unless I'm misreading the pricing, what makes this worth around double more traditional (and traditionally reliable) phone systems?
$20/user/month for 3,000 minutes isn't a good price, especially considering how much you have to pay to be on the other plan already. It's not just expensive, but locks to in to other expensive products to keep the phones.
I have a fancy spreadsheet which ask's this same question. I still don't have an answer, but here I am. . .
-
@DustinB3403 said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
I'm wondering if I should consider a Teams solution instead of a typical deskphone solution
So here is my question... unless I'm misreading the pricing, what makes this worth around double more traditional (and traditionally reliable) phone systems?
$20/user/month for 3,000 minutes isn't a good price, especially considering how much you have to pay to be on the other plan already. It's not just expensive, but locks to in to other expensive products to keep the phones.
I have a fancy spreadsheet which ask's this same question. I still don't have an answer, but here I am. . .
Because it is Teams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
@JaredBusch said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@DustinB3403 said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
I'm wondering if I should consider a Teams solution instead of a typical deskphone solution
So here is my question... unless I'm misreading the pricing, what makes this worth around double more traditional (and traditionally reliable) phone systems?
$20/user/month for 3,000 minutes isn't a good price, especially considering how much you have to pay to be on the other plan already. It's not just expensive, but locks to in to other expensive products to keep the phones.
I have a fancy spreadsheet which ask's this same question. I still don't have an answer, but here I am. . .
Because it is Teams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Teams wasn't even a real consideration when we migrated to SfB for our phone system
-
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
Why did they go this route?
Because management was hoping to have a unified communications platform (and pressure from even further up management)
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
What did they gain?
A headache and lots and lots of bitching about taking handsets away from people. Also an elevated blood pressure, more gray hair, increased stress, a simple "click to join" call functionality.
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
What did they lose?
Sleep, money, flexibility, mobility, functionality, compatibility with rather simple other needs
-
@DustinB3403 said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@JaredBusch said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@DustinB3403 said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
I'm wondering if I should consider a Teams solution instead of a typical deskphone solution
So here is my question... unless I'm misreading the pricing, what makes this worth around double more traditional (and traditionally reliable) phone systems?
$20/user/month for 3,000 minutes isn't a good price, especially considering how much you have to pay to be on the other plan already. It's not just expensive, but locks to in to other expensive products to keep the phones.
I have a fancy spreadsheet which ask's this same question. I still don't have an answer, but here I am. . .
Because it is Teams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Teams wasn't even a real consideration when we migrated to SfB for our phone system
With that in mind - it's really a mystery why your company went that direction?
-
@DustinB3403 said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
A headache and lots and lots of bitching about taking handsets away from people.
Yeah - this is my biggest concern.
We have workflows that are station based - not person based - think call center.
It might be nice to track what user is setting at one of those phones to know who's doing what, but the phone itself is just a station, and that station is what needs to get the call, not the user who logs into it - follow?
-
Thanks everyone - I was thinking this was pretty much a dead end - and it's definitely looking like that, but it's an option in the world and at minimum I felt it was at least worth talking about for a few mins.
-
At this point in time I don't feel that we need/will make use of a fully unified communication system. We have chat through our EHR system, which while available on our mobile devices, almost no one uses it that way, only while in the web client.
-
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@DustinB3403 said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
A headache and lots and lots of bitching about taking handsets away from people.
Yeah - this is my biggest concern.
Nothing in using Teams implies taking away handsets.
-
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
We have workflows that are station based - not person based - think call center.
Now this, Teams is not good at.
-
IIRC you can do service/station accounts within Teams.
-
@coliver said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
IIRC you can do service/station accounts within Teams.
My personal desire would be for both - station account for the device - and the user still logging in on the device so we know what user was making phone calls there.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
We have workflows that are station based - not person based - think call center.
Now this, Teams is not good at.
True - but often management is likely mis-sold on the idea that handsets are no longer needed, and instead the user uses their computer/cellphone as their device.
-
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
We have workflows that are station based - not person based - think call center.
Now this, Teams is not good at.
True - but often management is likely mis-sold on the idea that handsets are no longer needed, and instead the user uses their computer/cellphone as their device.
that's a totally separate issue that applies to all phone systems.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
We have workflows that are station based - not person based - think call center.
Now this, Teams is not good at.
True - but often management is likely mis-sold on the idea that handsets are no longer needed, and instead the user uses their computer/cellphone as their device.
that's a totally separate issue that applies to all phone systems.
meh - it can apply to all phone systems, but I'm guessing it generally doesn't apply to those installing the Mitel/3CX's of the world. It's a mindset thing. It's also the sales person selling the stuff thing.
-
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@scottalanmiller said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
@Dashrender said in Phone solutions - something like Skype/Teams - why/why not?:
We have workflows that are station based - not person based - think call center.
Now this, Teams is not good at.
True - but often management is likely mis-sold on the idea that handsets are no longer needed, and instead the user uses their computer/cellphone as their device.
that's a totally separate issue that applies to all phone systems.
meh - it can apply to all phone systems, but I'm guessing it generally doesn't apply to those installing the Mitel/3CX's of the world. It's a mindset thing. It's also the sales person selling the stuff thing.
I don't know, 3CX pushes that pretty hard.
