ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    I guess Skyetel doesn't want business

    IT Discussion
    skyetel
    16
    115
    11.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @frodooftheshire
      last edited by

      @frodooftheshire said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

      @JaredBusch Are you married? I'm trying to imagine what your wife must go through.

      I don’t feel personal attacks like this are called for!

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • C
        Curtis @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

        I don’t feel personal attacks like this are called for!

        Completely agree, but who is going to moderate it?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • IRJI
          IRJ
          last edited by

          The vultures have picked this one clean a long time ago.

          cbe456fb-4530-4440-af46-7a4b678fc821-image.png

          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • wirestyle22W
            wirestyle22 @frodooftheshire
            last edited by wirestyle22

            @frodooftheshire said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

            @JaredBusch Are you married? I'm trying to imagine what your wife must go through.

            I get very frustrated with JB and he gets very frustrated with me, but neither one of us would ever bring family into it. We're all trying to be the best version of ourselves that we can. Is this your best?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch
              last edited by

              I’m still waiting on @scottalanmiller to actually comment on the point of this topic. He has ranted more than once in the past about services requiring sms verification

              ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @IRJ
                last edited by DustinB3403

                @IRJ said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                The vultures have picked this one clean a long time ago.

                cbe456fb-4530-4440-af46-7a4b678fc821-image.png

                I still see that horse moving a bit, can I hit it some more?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • ObsolesceO
                  Obsolesce @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @JaredBusch said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                  I’m still waiting on @scottalanmiller to actually comment on the point of this topic.

                  He won't. But if he does, I'm sure he'll say this is some kind of exception.

                  JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @Obsolesce
                    last edited by JaredBusch

                    @Obsolesce said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                    @JaredBusch said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                    I’m still waiting on @scottalanmiller to actually comment on the point of this topic.

                    He won't. But if he does, I'm sure he'll say this is some kind of exception.

                    A week later and he hasn't. It is pretty obvious that advertisers influence him.

                    FWIW, @Skyetel has never bothered to try and contact me. So yeah, I guess they really don't want the business of businesses. Just hobbies that use cell phone sms verification.

                    edit:
                    c988f417-3758-4d9d-ba5b-4b92ad1bbb3b-image.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      Someone from @Skyetel contacted me by email a couple days ago, did not ask that I remove anything (so that's pretty good sign IMO), and I finally had time to reply this evening. My reply was not brief, we shall see where things go.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                        last edited by

                        @Obsolesce said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                        @JaredBusch said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                        I’m still waiting on @scottalanmiller to actually comment on the point of this topic.

                        He won't. But if he does, I'm sure he'll say this is some kind of exception.

                        It's tough to respond being with almost no Internet most of the time. It's not really an exception. Chris (the prez of Skyetel) and I have talked about it previously and knows that it is part of their process that I really dislike as we've run into the same problems as Jared. Using cell phones for personal identification isn't good, as not all people have them and cell phones aren't as static and predictable as you'd think being in the US, but using it for business is much harder as most companies (IMHO) don't even have a reliable way of doing this. I can't imagine how a Fortune 500 would deal with this, and many small businesses end up seeing it as a consumer service and either finding it awkward (most cases) or running into actual road blocks (like Jared has.)

                        I'm certainly no fan of it. I totally understand the underlying goals, and I appreciate that those goals are tough, but I don't like the resultant mechanism chosen, I don't think that it reflects what they want to do. I'm not sure what the right solution is, though. Seems like a credit card could do this better. Or maybe a variety of optional mechanisms with SMS being just one of them.

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by JaredBusch

                          @scottalanmiller Or, simply not lock the cell phone number out form ever being used again.

                          I would still bitch about the need, but I would at least be able to create accounts as needed.

                          This was one of the comments I had in my response last night.

                          As an example, Microsoft also requires this if you want to create an Office 365 Business account without going through a VAR or partner or WTF ever they call it. But the difference is, Microsoft uses it for the immediate verification and never saves that number. You can use that number again immediately so sign up another brand new Office 365 account.

                          Here I tried to use their business number but it would not because VoIP (Twilio in fact). So I used my mobile and SMS.
                          fe2b247b-c637-4ec9-8d00-523fa35aa32f-image.png

                          Immediately after account creation, I looked at the settings. My mobile used for SMS does not show anywhere.
                          06dad23a-db6e-4e0c-b32f-871000c4f9ab-image.png

                          So I popped another porn mode browser and started to sign up my daerma.com domain for an Exchange Online Plan 1, and used my mobile again to verify. It went straight through. I didn't complete the verification because I don't want to actually move the domain.
                          8a8829d7-7e30-46ed-aff4-76e75a5f1ac4-image.png

                          I bitched about it (see ML telegram chat), but I still got the work done. Because I knew that the number was not actually tied forever to some random client account.

                          But with Skyetel, my mobile is attached to the account in some way that I can never change. This is fine for this account, because it is my personal account. But what if I had done this on an account I made for our company or a client, just to check out their service? I'm screwed and my number would be forever tied to the account.
                          2fde524a-1649-4979-b52b-dbe3215c8ccd-image.png

                          Settings screens, none have anything about the cell phone number pictured above.
                          5a5a5be4-97a7-4bc8-8730-0a75f15e1ed9-image.png
                          8eec0ac4-984e-4401-903b-6381605ef7f9-image.png
                          9d66487b-fa66-4d50-b889-9cb3183b26bd-image.png
                          4e7302b1-588a-420d-b588-88124b9f7385-image.png
                          57c41b0f-cf8f-4b7f-bc69-68a8d4be66b1-image.png

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @JaredBusch said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                            Or, simply not lock the cell phone number out form ever being used again.

                            That would certainly help, a lot.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • SkyetelS
                              Skyetel
                              last edited by

                              Hey Guys,

                              We’re going to be reviewing this first thing on Monday. @JaredBusch had a strong argument about Microsoft in his email.

                              I can say that we will be removing the 1 cell phone number per account limit and allowing a certain number of new accounts per month instead (so you can create 5 or so accounts per month before our system stops you). We’re also going to be reviewing the credit card idea but that may take more time.

                              I’ll update you all once we have a new policy in place and it’s deployed.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 8
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                That's awesome!!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • DashrenderD
                                  Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  That's great news!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • DashrenderD
                                    Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    MS is even better than just allowing you to create multiple accounts under the same phone number, it allows you to use the same phone number for two factor authentication.

                                    I have a personal O365 account, and my office based MS account - I have TFA on both... but only one cell phone - luckily it worked.

                                    Yeah yeah yeah... I should be using the OTP app instead.

                                    travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • travisdh1T
                                      travisdh1 @Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      @Dashrender said in I guess Skyetel doesn't want business:

                                      Yeah yeah yeah... I should be using the OTP app instead.

                                      This. At least you know it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • SkyetelS
                                        Skyetel
                                        last edited by Skyetel

                                        Hey Guys,

                                        Behold our new sign up page!

                                        Screen Shot 2019-07-09 at 8.44.30 AM.png

                                        From the feedback here, we made the following changes:

                                        1. You can now re-use your mobile number on 5 new accounts per month (so go nuts @JaredBusch )
                                        2. The new field "Direct Contact Number" serves as the direct phone number for the customer; this is the number we call if there is a fraud event or a porting emergency. (so please make it a real phone number)
                                        3. We made it prettier 🙂

                                        Thanks for everyone's feedback - feel free to take it out for a spin!

                                        C scottalanmillerS DustinB3403D 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 6
                                        • C
                                          Curtis @Skyetel
                                          last edited by

                                          @Skyetel Nice work

                                          @JaredBusch seems like the title needs to be changed 😉

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Skyetel
                                            last edited by

                                            @Skyetel Awesome!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 2 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post