ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier

    IT Discussion
    edgeos edgeos 2.0.0 zerotier
    11
    52
    5.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @dafyre
      last edited by Dashrender

      @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

      @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

      @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

      Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.

      I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.

      I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.

      I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.

      I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.

      Isn't that bridging? more or less ?

      scottalanmillerS dafyreD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

        @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

        @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

        @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

        Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.

        I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.

        I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.

        I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.

        I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.

        Isn't that bridging? more or less ?

        Are you asking if a VPN is a bridge? That's actually a big "it depends".

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

          @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

          @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

          @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

          @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

          Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.

          I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.

          I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.

          I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.

          I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.

          Isn't that bridging? more or less ?

          Are you asking if a VPN is a bridge? That's actually a big "it depends".

          Of course it depends - but he setup a site to site using it - so for the devices on the LAN, it is (or at least can be - depending on settings - be acting as a bridge/bridge like interface

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

            Of course it depends - but he setup a site to site using it - so for the devices on the LAN, it is (or at least can be - depending on settings - be acting as a bridge/bridge like interface

            Most people, by far, set up VPNs to have different IP ranges on either end. So acting as a router, not a bridge.

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

              @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

              Of course it depends - but he setup a site to site using it - so for the devices on the LAN, it is (or at least can be - depending on settings - be acting as a bridge/bridge like interface

              Most people, by far, set up VPNs to have different IP ranges on either end. So acting as a router, not a bridge.

              Sure. This is one of my /sigh moments though - I'm sure the OP doesn't likely give a crap if it's a bridge connection or a routed one - it's more likely they simply want to know - is there a connection?

              Also - assuming the endpoints on the LAN don't have ZT installed on them, it's likely they are on a separate LAN from the ZT network - so a router would have to be done, which is what I though any of these "gateway" type solutions was really providing?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dafyreD
                dafyre @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.

                I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.

                I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.

                I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.

                I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.

                Isn't that bridging? more or less ?

                No, I've got it set up strictly doing routing between sites. I had odd issues when setting up the bridge that are eliminated when setting it up as a site-to-site vpn.

                The bonus is that I don't have to install ZT on everything, just a VM at each site, and add the appropriate routes.

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @dafyre
                  last edited by

                  @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                  @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                  @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                  @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                  @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                  Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.

                  I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.

                  I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.

                  I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.

                  I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.

                  Isn't that bridging? more or less ?

                  No, I've got it set up strictly doing routing between sites. I had odd issues when setting up the bridge that are eliminated when setting it up as a site-to-site vpn.

                  The bonus is that I don't have to install ZT on everything, just a VM at each site, and add the appropriate routes.

                  I guess I'd need to see a diagram so I could follow.

                  dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dafyreD
                    dafyre @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                    @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                    @Dashrender said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                    @dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                    @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                    @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                    Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.

                    I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.

                    I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.

                    I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.

                    I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.

                    Isn't that bridging? more or less ?

                    No, I've got it set up strictly doing routing between sites. I had odd issues when setting up the bridge that are eliminated when setting it up as a site-to-site vpn.

                    The bonus is that I don't have to install ZT on everything, just a VM at each site, and add the appropriate routes.

                    I guess I'd need to see a diagram so I could follow.

                    How's this?
                    ![4fb96b98-3628-4347-b84c-f5553fb4c984-image.png](https://i.imgur.com/CgWTyUj.png

                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @dafyre
                      last edited by

                      @dafyre
                      4fb96b98-3628-4347-b84c-f5553fb4c984-image.png

                      dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                        @dafyre
                        4fb96b98-3628-4347-b84c-f5553fb4c984-image.png

                        Thanks. Not sure how ( b0rked that.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jplee @VoIP_n00b
                          last edited by

                          @VoIP_n00b Yes, I have "Allow Bridging" checked. I'm still getting ping time outs from my lan.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            jplee
                            last edited by

                            These are my interfaces:

                            interfaces

                            And these are my routes:

                            routes

                            On the 192.168.50.0/24 (Lan1) network, I can successfully hit 10.1.1.0/24 (Lan2) addresses and go out on the internet. However, I can't get to any 10.147.20.0/24 nodes (ZT).

                            If I ssh into the router, I can ping anything on Lan1, Lan2, and ZT. This seems like it would be an easy solution that I'm missing???

                            Thanks.

                            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • V
                              VoIP_n00b @jplee
                              last edited by

                              @jplee Very Interesting! Can you share how you got ZT setup on the edge router?

                              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jplee @VoIP_n00b
                                last edited by

                                @VoIP_n00b I followed https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/. It was pretty straightforward. Make sure you follow Part 2 of the guide as well. Now if I can just get the ER-X to route. 😞

                                V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • V
                                  VoIP_n00b @jplee
                                  last edited by

                                  @jplee I would like that too 😞

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    jplee
                                    last edited by

                                    I have it working! I needed to NAT.

                                    alt text

                                    I also disabled routing to 192.168.50.0/24 on ZeroTier Central and unchecked "Allow Bridging". They aren't needed.

                                    V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • V
                                      VoIP_n00b @jplee
                                      last edited by

                                      @jplee Interesting. I'll have to try it. As many details as you can provide would be great!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DashrenderD
                                        Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        Why would you need to NAT? If you want the real IPs to work, you should be able to use them.

                                        I don't NAT any of my other VPNs.

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          jplee @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender I couldn't get the ER-X to route LAN>ZT. NAT, although not ideal, did the trick for me. I'd love to hear if anyone has a no NAT solution.

                                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @jplee
                                            last edited by

                                            @jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:

                                            @Dashrender I couldn't get the ER-X to route LAN>ZT. NAT, although not ideal, did the trick for me. I'd love to hear if anyone has a no NAT solution.

                                            Remind me what you setup is, I have a ER-X lying around I can set it up and give it a try this weekend.

                                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post