Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Government spending is not under the control of the citizens, whatever we all want to believe. I'm pretty sure your government doesn't give you an account of where each dollar you paid in taxes went.
They do not, but we recognize it as corruption.
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
why is it not an option? What stops the government from lowing taxes?
Greed. Corruption. Insane military spending (the only viable reason actually, considering who their neighbours are). Messed up democratic process, causing well organized partizan parties to blackmail the entire country into giving them a free-for-all. I could go on and on
Right, and all we are saying is that corruption is the cause here. Not that there is an easy fix, or that companies don't have to work within the system. It's just really clear who is bribing whom and that the people aren't rising up to tackle it.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
People just won't vote for a good government?
People cannot vote for a good government. Impossible. People vote for a party, and the party with most votes gets to assemble a government. If the winning party fails to collect more than half the mandates in the parliament, they lose the right to assemble a government to the next largest party.
Now, there are 120 seats in the parliament, so you need 61 at least. The largest party typically has 25-35 seats, so they have to build a coalition. That means giving in to demands of lesser parties to reach those 61+ seats. And there are parties who serve only the interests of a specific group. So basically they say "we'll vote for whatever you want to pass, if you exempt our group from all taxes, and pay them a stipend". Its blatant blackmail, but if you want to rule the country, you have to get those 61 seats, so you agree... And you end up with a huge spending point in your budget, basically feeding the voter base for those people. Lowering taxes? You can barely scrape by, and you have a country to run, country with no natural resources, too many demands, and neighbours on all sides trying to murder the hell out of you.
-
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
But let's say an employee had their own health coverage - so they didn't want/need the company's supplied one - will the company give them the cash they would otherwise pay the insurance company? Some companies will, some won't.
Right, those "benefits" apply unevenly and are better for the companies, but worse for the employees. People in dual income families (generally the poorest parts of society) get hurt the most as they need the money more and are less able to leverage the benefits as the benefits are not individually tailored (normally.)
My wife's company compensation includes family coverage. Since I have my own coverage, she actually gets some cash back. I know the same is true for where I work, if it was better for me to be on my wife's insurance, my company would pay me the cash spent on my insurance coverage.
That's nice, and super rare.
-
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
But let's say an employee had their own health coverage - so they didn't want/need the company's supplied one - will the company give them the cash they would otherwise pay the insurance company? Some companies will, some won't.
Right, those "benefits" apply unevenly and are better for the companies, but worse for the employees. People in dual income families (generally the poorest parts of society) get hurt the most as they need the money more and are less able to leverage the benefits as the benefits are not individually tailored (normally.)
My wife's company compensation includes family coverage. Since I have my own coverage, she actually gets some cash back. I know the same is true for where I work, if it was better for me to be on my wife's insurance, my company would pay me the cash spent on my insurance coverage.
That is actually atypical in many places now. Most are employee only. If the employee wants family, they pay some nominal amount. Or, if the spouse works and has coverage available, they are required to take it.
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Lowering taxes? You can barely scrape by, and you have a country to run, country with no natural resources, too many demands, and neighbours on all sides trying to murder the hell out of you.
High taxes don't really solve any of those problems, but can make a lot of them worse. High taxes put a bigger burden on the economy making it less competitive and makes labour more expensive.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
But let's say an employee had their own health coverage - so they didn't want/need the company's supplied one - will the company give them the cash they would otherwise pay the insurance company? Some companies will, some won't.
Right, those "benefits" apply unevenly and are better for the companies, but worse for the employees. People in dual income families (generally the poorest parts of society) get hurt the most as they need the money more and are less able to leverage the benefits as the benefits are not individually tailored (normally.)
My wife's company compensation includes family coverage. Since I have my own coverage, she actually gets some cash back. I know the same is true for where I work, if it was better for me to be on my wife's insurance, my company would pay me the cash spent on my insurance coverage.
That's nice, and super rare.
I know
-
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
High taxes don't really solve any of those problems, but can make a lot of them worse. High taxes put a bigger burden on the economy making it less competitive and makes labour more expensive.
Well, the people managing that economy aren't stupid, I'm sure they are doing what they can, in the given conditions. Still, it's nowhere near the conditions the US or any EU country is in. I'd change the political system, to eliminate the abuse first, move to a two party system, instead of the current coalition based insanity, which is so easy to abuse
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
High taxes don't really solve any of those problems, but can make a lot of them worse. High taxes put a bigger burden on the economy making it less competitive and makes labour more expensive.
Well, the people managing that economy aren't stupid, I'm sure they are doing what they can, in the given conditions. Still, it's nowhere near the conditions the US or any EU country is in. I'd change the political system, to eliminate the abuse first, move to a two party system, instead of the current coalition based insanity, which is so easy to abuse
Politics is more about how can I make $$$$ today. Four years from now a new guy could be elected, so I need to do what is best for TODAY. Politicians generally dont think even 4 years out, they certainly dont think 10 or 20 years out. Because in 10 or 20 years nobody will remember what kind of corrupt law they passed 10 years ago and they will never get any blame. Then you have the new politician just repeating the cycle and doing the same shit.
-
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Politics is more about how can I make $$$$ today. Four years from now a new guy could be elected, so I need to do what is best for TODAY. Politicians generally dont think even 4 years out, they certainly dont think 10 or 20 years out. Because in 10 or 20 years nobody will remember what kind of corrupt law they passed 10 years ago and they will never get any blame. Then you have the new politician just repeating the cycle and doing the same shit.
that's completely irrelevant
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
High taxes don't really solve any of those problems, but can make a lot of them worse. High taxes put a bigger burden on the economy making it less competitive and makes labour more expensive.
Well, the people managing that economy aren't stupid, I'm sure they are doing what they can, in the given conditions. Still, it's nowhere near the conditions the US or any EU country is in. I'd change the political system, to eliminate the abuse first, move to a two party system, instead of the current coalition based insanity, which is so easy to abuse
Scott would start by declaring himself dictator.
-
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@scottalanmiller said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
High taxes don't really solve any of those problems, but can make a lot of them worse. High taxes put a bigger burden on the economy making it less competitive and makes labour more expensive.
Well, the people managing that economy aren't stupid, I'm sure they are doing what they can, in the given conditions. Still, it's nowhere near the conditions the US or any EU country is in. I'd change the political system, to eliminate the abuse first, move to a two party system, instead of the current coalition based insanity, which is so easy to abuse
Politics is more about how can I make $$$$ today. Four years from now a new guy could be elected, so I need to do what is best for TODAY. Politicians generally dont think even 4 years out, they certainly dont think 10 or 20 years out. Because in 10 or 20 years nobody will remember what kind of corrupt law they passed 10 years ago and they will never get any blame. Then you have the new politician just repeating the cycle and doing the same shit.
Exactly - Sure, those people managing the economy aren't stupid - instead they are super corrupt! Only looking out for themselves.
-
@pmoncho said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Spending money for the sake of spending money and creating fake jobs because of it, is just smoke and mirrors. No real world problem is solved. It's ok though because we can just print more money. Economic Stimulus is nice and all, but it is really just a temp solution. You cant keep throwing out money to solve issues that dont exists. This is the kind of stuff that builds up over time and creates issues. You need to find a real solution of the long term that provides value.
Nothing fake about creating jobs there. I have friends who worked for those fleet management companies, and the food they put on the table was real enough.
Well, there is a decent book about BS jobs on Amazon.
Worth a read if you haven't. It's very good.
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Politics is more about how can I make $$$$ today. Four years from now a new guy could be elected, so I need to do what is best for TODAY. Politicians generally dont think even 4 years out, they certainly dont think 10 or 20 years out. Because in 10 or 20 years nobody will remember what kind of corrupt law they passed 10 years ago and they will never get any blame. Then you have the new politician just repeating the cycle and doing the same shit.
that's completely irrelevant
How is that irrelevant?
-
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Exactly - Sure, those people managing the economy aren't stupid - instead they are super corrupt! Only looking out for themselves.
Some are corrupt, some are doing a great job under shitty conditions. Simple fact - in 2008 Israel remained untouched by the crisis, the economy remained strong, unlike pretty much everywhere else. So some people there are doing a good job and certainly know what they are doing. Is the economy or the politics there generally healthy? Hell no.
-
@coliver said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@pmoncho said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Spending money for the sake of spending money and creating fake jobs because of it, is just smoke and mirrors. No real world problem is solved. It's ok though because we can just print more money. Economic Stimulus is nice and all, but it is really just a temp solution. You cant keep throwing out money to solve issues that dont exists. This is the kind of stuff that builds up over time and creates issues. You need to find a real solution of the long term that provides value.
Nothing fake about creating jobs there. I have friends who worked for those fleet management companies, and the food they put on the table was real enough.
Well, there is a decent book about BS jobs on Amazon.
Worth a read if you haven't. It's very good.
It sure is.
-
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
How is that irrelevant?
Because I never said politics are about making $$. I said the politics in a specific country are such, that there is a huge expense that needs to be constantly sustained, which prevents lowering taxes.
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@Dashrender said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
Exactly - Sure, those people managing the economy aren't stupid - instead they are super corrupt! Only looking out for themselves.
Some are corrupt, some are doing a great job under shitty conditions. Simple fact - in 2008 Israel remained untouched by the crisis, the economy remained strong, unlike pretty much everywhere else. So some people there are doing a good job and certainly know what they are doing. Is the economy or the politics there generally healthy? Hell no.
I don't think that's a good thing - it shows that they aren't really participating in the rest of the world.. even more corruption.
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
How is that irrelevant?
Because I never said politics are about making $$.
They 100% are about making money LOL
-
@dyasny said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
@IRJ said in Finally leaving my job, and it's just as annoying as I thought it would be:
How is that irrelevant?
Because I never said politics are about making $$. I said the politics in a specific country are such, that there is a huge expense that needs to be constantly sustained, which prevents lowering taxes.
That's what we are saying - no that expense does not need to be maintained. Only by their corruption does it need to be maintained.
