ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect

    IT Discussion
    remote access screenconnect meshcentral meshcentral 2 connectwise control connectwise
    39
    980
    215.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      On 0.3.6-i now.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Scott Banned
        last edited by

        On 0.3.6-i as well.

        Installed on client via the invite feature and Desktop does not work on newly installed client.

        Also, with each new install, Duplicate Agent count under Agent Error Counters goes up by one.

        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • black3dynamiteB
          black3dynamite @Scott
          last edited by

          @Scott said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

          On 0.3.6-i as well.

          Installed on client via the invite feature and Desktop does not work on newly installed client.

          Also, with each new install, Duplicate Agent count under Agent Error Counters goes up by one.

          Is the newly installed client Windows 10 1903?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            Scott Banned
            last edited by

            6.1.7601

            Windows 7

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Scott Banned
              last edited by

              0.3.6-k; agent installed via the invite function.

              Client shows agent connected; 7 Day power state for 6/12/2019 shows connected 12:00:00 to 09:14:42am (it is now 12:18pm).

              Connecting to desktop sometimes proceeds and says Connected, but no image is displayed; sometimes attempting to connect to desktop states "Setup..." and no image is displayed. Same with Terminal and Files: either says Connected or Setup... yet nothing connects.

              For those using this in production to service clients, is there some secret here to get this to work consistently?

              black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • black3dynamiteB
                black3dynamite @Scott
                last edited by

                @Scott said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                0.3.6-k; agent installed via the invite function.

                Client shows agent connected; 7 Day power state for 6/12/2019 shows connected 12:00:00 to 09:14:42am (it is now 12:18pm).

                Connecting to desktop sometimes proceeds and says Connected, but no image is displayed; sometimes attempting to connect to desktop states "Setup..." and no image is displayed. Same with Terminal and Files: either says Connected or Setup... yet nothing connects.

                For those using this in production to service clients, is there some secret here to get this to work consistently?

                It's been too random for me. It works fine when connecting to Linux systems.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  Scott Banned
                  last edited by

                  I was wondering if it is me. I have heard great things about this from people using it to service clients and who are switching from other remote access solutions, but I find it too random for me to use.

                  When it works, it's great.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Scott
                    last edited by

                    @Scott said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                    I was wondering if it is me. I have heard great things about this from people using it to service clients and who are switching from other remote access solutions, but I find it too random for me to use.

                    When it works, it's great.

                    In our case, we almost always control the environments that it is going into. So things like AV problems don't arise for us.

                    CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • CloudKnightC
                      CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller I get this, sometimes you may not be able to change the current A/V solution they are using though. This is still an issue.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • YlianY
                        Ylian
                        last edited by Ylian

                        Starting with MeshCentral v0.3.6-m, both the 32bit and 64bit MeshAgents should no longer report as a problem with any anti-virus. Both get a perfect score on virustotal.com. Update your server and you should be fine.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • YlianY
                          Ylian
                          last edited by

                          Quick note that MeshCentral v0.3.6-n just got published with remote user consent support for remote desktop, terminal and file access. The remote user prompt will work on Windows, MacOS and many Linux distributions. This is a much improved MeshAgent, so lots of fixes. Enjoy and of course, feedback appreciated.

                          MC2-UserConsent.png
                          MC2-UserConsent2.png

                          JaredBuschJ CloudKnightC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 6
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch @Ylian
                            last edited by

                            @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                            Quick note that MeshCentral v0.3.6-n just got published with remote user consent support for remote desktop, terminal and file access. The remote user prompt will work on Windows, MacOS and many Linux distributions. This is a much improved MeshAgent, so lots of fixes. Enjoy and of course, feedback appreciated.

                            Awesome.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • CloudKnightC
                              CloudKnight @Ylian
                              last edited by

                              @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                              Quick note that MeshCentral v0.3.6-n just got published with remote user consent support for remote desktop, terminal and file access. The remote user prompt will work on Windows, MacOS and many Linux distributions. This is a much improved MeshAgent, so lots of fixes. Enjoy and of course, feedback appreciated.

                              MC2-UserConsent.png
                              MC2-UserConsent2.png

                              Excellent work.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @Ylian
                                last edited by

                                @Ylian said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                Starting with MeshCentral v0.3.6-m, both the 32bit and 64bit MeshAgents should no longer report as a problem with any anti-virus. Both get a perfect score on virustotal.com. Update your server and you should be fine.

                                Awesome work, as always.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
                                  last edited by

                                  @StuartJordan said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                  @scottalanmiller I get this, sometimes you may not be able to change the current A/V solution they are using though. This is still an issue.

                                  Oh its an issue, just critical to understand where the issue is. Broken AV needs to be recognized as broken AV.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    0.3.7-h .... we just updated to here.

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

                                      0.3.7-h .... we just updated to here.

                                      And now 0.3.7-k. Being this far off of the time zone than the team makes updating MC easier, at least.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • YlianY
                                        Ylian
                                        last edited by

                                        Just posted a blog on the latest MeshCentral2 improvements. Added FreeBSD support, Puppy Linux support, Account creation invitation Email, Notification control and API Tracing.

                                        MC2-PuppyBSD.png

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Ylian
                                          last edited by

                                          @Ylian Awesome, about to check it out.

                                          Top on our list.... group security for access to host groups. We need to be able to put users into groups, and assign groups to things. I see the underpinnings of that started, so hoping it comes soon. You don't have to be very big before user management is a nightmare otherwise. 🙂

                                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller I put in a github issue on this a while ago.

                                            YlianY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 22
                                            • 23
                                            • 24
                                            • 25
                                            • 26
                                            • 48
                                            • 49
                                            • 24 / 49
                                            • First post
                                              Last post