ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Windows NT Release History

    IT Discussion
    windows windows nt windows 10 windows versions windows vista windows 7 windows 8 windows 8.1 windows 2000 windows xp
    14
    47
    3.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      Right, I wanted something that shows a far more complete picture. Once you have it all together, it is so much easier to visualize how far away something like XP is from today's releases.

      BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403
        last edited by

        Ah so that is how you make tables here.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BRRABillB
          BRRABill @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

          Right, I wanted something that shows a far more complete picture. Once you have it all together, it is so much easier to visualize how far away something like XP is from today's releases.

          Still love XP. ๐Ÿ™‚

          travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • KellyK
            Kelly
            last edited by

            Only 500 some odd days until Win 7 is out of support.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
              last edited by

              @dustinb3403 said in Windows NT Release History:

              Ah so that is how you make tables here.

              Standard markdown.

              DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                @dustinb3403 said in Windows NT Release History:

                Ah so that is how you make tables here.

                Standard markdown.

                Yeah yeah. . . I obviously don't use markdown often.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Kelly
                  last edited by

                  @kelly said in Windows NT Release History:

                  Only 500 some odd days until Win 7 is out of support.

                  Which is not very long at all, in migration to something else terms. Time to get moving on that stuff.

                  KellyK jmooreJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KellyK
                    Kelly @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                    @kelly said in Windows NT Release History:

                    Only 500 some odd days until Win 7 is out of support.

                    Which is not very long at all, in migration to something else terms. Time to get moving on that stuff.

                    Eggzactry

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jmooreJ
                      jmoore @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller Yeah your right, we did our Windows 10 migration last summer

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • travisdh1T
                        travisdh1 @BRRABill
                        last edited by

                        @brrabill said in Windows NT Release History:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                        Right, I wanted something that shows a far more complete picture. Once you have it all together, it is so much easier to visualize how far away something like XP is from today's releases.

                        Still love XP. ๐Ÿ™‚

                        My favorite Windows out of all of them was 2000. All the good stuff from NT4, without the boot drive limitation, which actually did bite a colleague once.

                        black3dynamiteB scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • black3dynamiteB
                          black3dynamite @travisdh1
                          last edited by black3dynamite

                          @travisdh1 said in Windows NT Release History:

                          @brrabill said in Windows NT Release History:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                          Right, I wanted something that shows a far more complete picture. Once you have it all together, it is so much easier to visualize how far away something like XP is from today's releases.

                          Still love XP. ๐Ÿ™‚

                          My favorite Windows out of all of them was 2000. All the good stuff from NT4, without the boot drive limitation, which actually did bite a colleague once.

                          The classic destop theme was my favorite when using XP, Vista and 7.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                            last edited by

                            @travisdh1 said in Windows NT Release History:

                            @brrabill said in Windows NT Release History:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                            Right, I wanted something that shows a far more complete picture. Once you have it all together, it is so much easier to visualize how far away something like XP is from today's releases.

                            Still love XP. ๐Ÿ™‚

                            My favorite Windows out of all of them was 2000. All the good stuff from NT4, without the boot drive limitation, which actually did bite a colleague once.

                            That was my least favourite. NT4 was the best I ever worked with, XP was like 2000 but fixed. 2000 was all the legacy of NT4, but without being updated or modern.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • CloudKnightC
                              CloudKnight
                              last edited by

                              I prefer the start menu in windows 7 as well, the start menu in windows 10 is just horrid. Just things in windows 10 seems like a longer process, like changing network adaptor settings... more clicks involved...

                              DustinB3403D scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403 @CloudKnight
                                last edited by

                                @stuartjordan said in Windows NT Release History:

                                I prefer the start menu in windows 7 as well, the start menu in windows 10 is just horrid. Just things in windows 10 seems like a longer process, like changing network adaptor settings... more clicks involved...

                                What I think you meant was "more idiotfied".

                                Idiotfied: to be made more intuitive for users who generally should not be involved in something.

                                CloudKnightC scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • CloudKnightC
                                  CloudKnight @DustinB3403
                                  last edited by CloudKnight

                                  @dustinb3403 They should of branched off another version called "Windows Idiotfied Edition" and left it how it was for businesses and people that actually use their machine for practical work.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
                                    last edited by

                                    @stuartjordan said in Windows NT Release History:

                                    I prefer the start menu in windows 7 as well, the start menu in windows 10 is just horrid. Just things in windows 10 seems like a longer process, like changing network adaptor settings... more clicks involved...

                                    @Romo and I were just talking about how it is IMPOSSIBLE to figure out if an app is installed. You type in its name, it doesn't come up. There is zero reliable way to deterministically get the same app list from the same actions time after time.

                                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      @dustinb3403 said in Windows NT Release History:

                                      @stuartjordan said in Windows NT Release History:

                                      I prefer the start menu in windows 7 as well, the start menu in windows 10 is just horrid. Just things in windows 10 seems like a longer process, like changing network adaptor settings... more clicks involved...

                                      What I think you meant was "more idiotfied".

                                      Idiotfied: to be made more intuitive for users who generally should not be involved in something.

                                      I don't think it is. It's more "confusified" to make it less useful.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
                                        last edited by

                                        @stuartjordan said in Windows NT Release History:

                                        @dustinb3403 They should of branched off another version called "Windows Idiotfied Edition" and left it how it was for businesses and people that actually use their machine for practical work.

                                        That's the branch they have now.

                                        CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • CloudKnightC
                                          CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                                          @stuartjordan said in Windows NT Release History:

                                          @dustinb3403 They should of branched off another version called "Windows Idiotfied Edition" and left it how it was for businesses and people that actually use their machine for practical work.

                                          That's the branch they have now.

                                          Very true! ๐Ÿ™‚

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Windows NT Release History:

                                            @stuartjordan said in Windows NT Release History:

                                            I prefer the start menu in windows 7 as well, the start menu in windows 10 is just horrid. Just things in windows 10 seems like a longer process, like changing network adaptor settings... more clicks involved...

                                            @Romo and I were just talking about how it is IMPOSSIBLE to figure out if an app is installed. You type in its name, it doesn't come up. There is zero reliable way to deterministically get the same app list from the same actions time after time.

                                            We discuss that on here like a year ago or so and I disagreed with you then and I still disagree with you just because you canโ€™t do something right are you set some setting that nobody else has a problem with doesnโ€™t mean the entire system is wrong

                                            travisdh1T scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post