ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!

    News
    18
    316
    40.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ObsolesceO
      Obsolesce
      last edited by Obsolesce

      Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.

      If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ObsolesceO
        Obsolesce
        last edited by

        Everything in the articles you post are saying "alcohol" but they are not. They are based on otherwise healthy drinks that contain alcohol. Nothing on alcohol alone.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ObsolesceO
          Obsolesce
          last edited by Obsolesce

          Yeah I followed your other link too... same thing.

          Conclusion is that alcohol is still bad, but the drinks it's in is still providing the health benefits.

          You get people injecting or drinking pure alcohol, all that goes out the door.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
            last edited by

            @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

            Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.

            If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.

            You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.

            basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.

            ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
              last edited by

              @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

              You get people injecting or drinking pure alcohol, all that goes out the door.

              Which article said that?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ObsolesceO
                Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                last edited by Obsolesce

                @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.

                If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.

                You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.

                basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.

                I'm sure they know the difference. But they are not controlling for that difference. So it's very likely why they are seeing those results due to the drink and not the alcohol.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ObsolesceO
                  Obsolesce
                  last edited by

                  All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study. It does not factor in whay the drink is, or if they are taking other supplements... which could be the case of they are so healthy.

                  Bad study imho.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                    last edited by

                    @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                    @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                    Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.

                    If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.

                    You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.

                    basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.

                    I'm sure they know the difference. But they are not controlling for that difference. So it's very likely why they are seeing those results due to the drink and not the alcohol.

                    If they know the difference, and are not controlling for it, that would mean that they are flat out lying.

                    ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                      last edited by

                      @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                      All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study.

                      That represents something like 90% of all drinkers.

                      ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ObsolesceO
                        Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                        @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                        @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                        Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.

                        If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.

                        You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.

                        basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.

                        I'm sure they know the difference. But they are not controlling for that difference. So it's very likely why they are seeing those results due to the drink and not the alcohol.

                        If they know the difference, and are not controlling for it, that would mean that they are flat out lying.

                        It looks like they are... It's very much a correlation case, not causation.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          I'm not saying that US doctors aren't willing to flat out lie, or that the Mayo clinic is some gold standard of scientific rigor. I'm only pointing out that knowingly lying about the results of their study is... well lying.

                          ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ObsolesceO
                            Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                            @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                            All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study.

                            That represents something like 90% of all drinkers.

                            Where is this statistic?

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                              last edited by

                              @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                              @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                              All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study.

                              That represents something like 90% of all drinkers.

                              Where is this statistic?

                              It's been published a LOT recently as the US just did a recent study and showed just how little people actually drink. I've seen it several times just this week, so in theory I can find it again.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ObsolesceO
                                Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                I'm not saying that US doctors aren't willing to flat out lie, or that the Mayo clinic is some gold standard of scientific rigor. I'm only pointing out that knowingly lying about the results of their study is... well lying.

                                Look at this stuff all the way through to the study's themselves. And see what they account for. Nothing to make a real determination of health and alcohol alone.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  This one is from 2014, but it's not like these numbers change much over time.

                                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/25/think-you-drink-a-lot-this-chart-will-tell-you

                                  80% of Americans have one drink OR LESS per day.
                                  90% of Americans have two drinks or LESS per day.

                                  Only 10% of all Americans, the top decile, go past the 2 (or about 2.2) drinks per day average mark. All drinkers of 2.2 or higher fall into just 10% of the total population.

                                  ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                    last edited by

                                    @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                    I'm not saying that US doctors aren't willing to flat out lie, or that the Mayo clinic is some gold standard of scientific rigor. I'm only pointing out that knowingly lying about the results of their study is... well lying.

                                    Look at this stuff all the way through to the study's themselves. And see what they account for. Nothing to make a real determination of health and alcohol alone.

                                    That may be true, but they seem to use more rigor than the studies claiming the alcohol itself is bad. Take the recent study from the UK, they didn't even have a control group and did less, rather than more.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ObsolesceO
                                      Obsolesce
                                      last edited by

                                      All of the "pro alcohol" studies say the same thing... If you have a healthy drink a day, you will see the health benefits of that drink, even if it contains a small amount of alcohol. But If you have more than that and those drinks contain alcohol, the negative impact of alcohol will outweigh the benefits of the drink the alcohol is in.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ObsolesceO
                                        Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                        This one is from 2014, but it's not like these numbers change much over time.

                                        https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/25/think-you-drink-a-lot-this-chart-will-tell-you

                                        80% of Americans have one drink OR LESS per day.
                                        90% of Americans have two drinks or LESS per day.

                                        Only 10% of all Americans, the top decile, go past the 2 (or about 2.2) drinks per day average mark. All drinkers of 2.2 or higher fall into just 10% of the total population.

                                        That does not say 90 percent of drinkers are healthy.

                                        Even if it did say something like that which it doesnt at all, it would need to account for the relatively new (young) drinkers in which alcohol consumption would not yet had time to diminish their health, and to also determine what healthy is.

                                        Just being alive isn't a good definition of healthy.

                                        I know a large percentage of the population drinks. I also know a large percentage of the population is unhealthy.

                                        scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                          last edited by

                                          @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                          All of the "pro alcohol" studies say the same thing... If you have a healthy drink a day, you will see the health benefits of that drink, even if it contains a small amount of alcohol.

                                          That's not what the studies I've seen (and linked) claim. Maybe that's what they measured, but it is not what they state as the result. The words and meaning you are using are explicitely different than the words and meaning that they use.

                                          ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                            last edited by

                                            @tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:

                                            This one is from 2014, but it's not like these numbers change much over time.

                                            https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/25/think-you-drink-a-lot-this-chart-will-tell-you

                                            80% of Americans have one drink OR LESS per day.
                                            90% of Americans have two drinks or LESS per day.

                                            Only 10% of all Americans, the top decile, go past the 2 (or about 2.2) drinks per day average mark. All drinkers of 2.2 or higher fall into just 10% of the total population.

                                            That does not say 90 percent of drinkers are healthy.

                                            No, but you stated that the studies were based on a low number of drinks, I said that that low number was the normal number (or less) for normal drinkers. You asked how I knew that, I showed. No one suggested taht binge drinking around the clock is healthy. Only that heavy drinking is a small percentage of drinkers and that the studies are studying drinking rates that reflect the majority of the real world, not outliers.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 15
                                            • 16
                                            • 3 / 16
                                            • First post
                                              Last post