Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller The way Microsoft calls everything RDS now I am not sure it is clear what I am saying.
Not sure what you mean. there is only one thing called RDS that I know of.
Used to be Virtual Server, Hyper-V and Terminal Services. Now they sort of refer to it all as Remote Desktop Services and say there is "Session Based" "VDI" "Dedicated and Pooled".
No, that's still RDS and really is RDS. VDI exists without RDS. Hyper-V exists without RDS. TS is renamed RDS, that's all. None of those other things are RDS. RDS is just one thing, that is often used in conjunction with those other things, but they are not included in it. RDS with VDI is still full RDS, just used as a gateway to VDI. VDI exists totally separately from it. Even at at licensing level, there is no connection.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller we dont have existing desktops. Everyone has a laptop or will be issued when so it leaves things where theres.... no where to remote into LOL
Weird. So this is all theoretical, there is no existing workflows today?
No, but the existing method is that you go back to the office and work through files. You may browse and search through a lot of revisions to find what you are looking for when you are at a cellular site, for example.
Since we are splitting off from the people who were most resistant to change we are finally able to take a fresh look at how we would like to set things up.
Pesonally I also like Terminal Services for controlling access to systems and being able to easily lock a terminated employee out. I will probably contain everything to TS sessions (data, IP based access to our voice network switches, VSAT software, etc)
But I can do a lot of that regardless now, it just prevents certain secure systems from being accessed remotely. Which systems is necessary and an on-call employee has to drive in to troubleshoot a 2am issue.
-
Scott - not using a RDS gateway would mean having to do a bunch more painful solutions to get access to multiple PCs behind the firewall (VPN, or one IP per machine, or port mapping to each PC, etc)
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
The CAD will work, and mostly used for looking at drawings not actually doing CAD. Not sure how well running CAD would be, I have seen it work will with Citrix but never just Windows Server.
If by Citrix you mean XenApp, that is basically just an enhanced RDP replacement that is a bit more efficient. If it works on XenApp, it'll work on Windows Server since that's what XenApp runs on.
-
@Dashrender said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
Scott - not using a RDS gateway would mean having to do a bunch more painful solutions to get access to multiple PCs behind the firewall (VPN, or one IP per machine, or port mapping to each PC, etc)
OR it could just mean running an alternative that is no more complex. RDS isn't super simple, I doubt it is even the simplest option. Guacamole does this for free, for example.
-
As most shops just assume that any use of RDS requires VPN, the VPN solves this issue, too. Use any VPN product and voila, the needs for the RDS gateway vanishes, too.
Lots of simple ways to skin that cat.
-
@scottalanmiller Was referring to running VDI instances of Server 2016 (similar to what Amazon Workspaces does because of Windows 10 VDI licensing limitations) I was curious as to whether each instance then needed a 2016 server license.
Whats frustrtating to me is, you can have 10 Windows 10 Pro instances running in a rack on 10 servers, and be fine to offer everyone their own desktop to access over RDP. But if you merely want to combine that onto a slightly more powerful server for VDI, the licensing isnt available or ends up costs many times more.
~Andy
-
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
RDS with VDI is still full RDS, just used as a gateway to VDI. VDI exists totally separately from it. Even at at licensing level, there is no connection.
So you're saying you can use RDP to connect to those VDI sessions and pay no RDS licensing?
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
And then, then I think Office 365 licensing doesnt work for Office. May have to VL the Office 2016 licenses. Will have to check on that now too...
They fixed that.
-
@Dashrender said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
RDS with VDI is still full RDS, just used as a gateway to VDI. VDI exists totally separately from it. Even at at licensing level, there is no connection.
So you're saying you can use RDP to connect to those VDI sessions and pay no RDS licensing?
Of course, users do this every day. You don't have RDS to connect to your desktop. RDS is only needed for accessing a Windows system by more than one user. VDI by definition is single user. So RDS never applies.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@Dashrender said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
RDS with VDI is still full RDS, just used as a gateway to VDI. VDI exists totally separately from it. Even at at licensing level, there is no connection.
So you're saying you can use RDP to connect to those VDI sessions and pay no RDS licensing?
Of course, users do this every day. You don't have RDS to connect to your desktop. RDS is only needed for accessing a Windows system by more than one user. VDI by definition is single user. So RDS never applies.
So you are saying my example listed above, of just running 10 dedicated windows 10 instances on Hyper-V or Xen would be legal from a licensing perspective?
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller Was referring to running VDI instances of Server 2016 (similar to what Amazon Workspaces does because of Windows 10 VDI licensing limitations) I was curious as to whether each instance then needed a 2016 server license.
nothing changes with them, they are just normal servers. So yes, they all have to be licensed. But one datacenter license per server is all that you need. So they get much cheaper than traditional VDI very quickly. That's why Amazon uses them.
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@Dashrender said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
RDS with VDI is still full RDS, just used as a gateway to VDI. VDI exists totally separately from it. Even at at licensing level, there is no connection.
So you're saying you can use RDP to connect to those VDI sessions and pay no RDS licensing?
Of course, users do this every day. You don't have RDS to connect to your desktop. RDS is only needed for accessing a Windows system by more than one user. VDI by definition is single user. So RDS never applies.
So you are saying my example listed above, of just running 10 dedicated windows 10 instances on Hyper-V or Xen would be legal from a licensing perspective?
Of course, as long as you license them for VDI - which is totally unrelated to anything RDS. People do this every day. That's what VDI is.
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
Whats frustrtating to me is, you can have 10 Windows 10 Pro instances running in a rack on 10 servers, and be fine to offer everyone their own desktop to access over RDP. But if you merely want to combine that onto a slightly more powerful server for VDI, the licensing isnt available or ends up costs many times more.
Not sure what you mean. If you want VDI, you license VDI which isn't cheap but you ONLY want it when you are using software that you are beholden to so you should blame your software vendors, not Microsoft. MS is just taken advantage of other bad decisions and bad vendors. And if you want RDS, it's pretty affordable.
-
@scottalanmiller Somewhere along the way I picked up that Windows 10 Pro running as Virtual Desktop was not legal to license in any way. While it would not be a good solution at scale (to manage) running 10 on a server for my situation would be fine.
But maybe its still that Windows 10 Pro licenses can not be optained for this use outside of a large VL bulk purchase?
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
No, but the existing method is that you go back to the office and work through files. You may browse and search through a lot of revisions to find what you are looking for when you are at a cellular site, for example.
How do they do this, though, if they have no machines at work?
-
@scottalanmiller We have machines, as part of the split the old company is keeping the existing IT infrastructure. We are taking our data and leaving the premise IT with them.
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller Somewhere along the way I picked up that Windows 10 Pro running as Virtual Desktop was not legal to license in any way.
That's what VDI licensing is. That's literally the only thing that it is. VDI licensing is for that one thing only, nothing else. Never has been.
On the tech side, VDI is one to one desktop virtualization. That's all.
On the licensing side, MS is the only vendor with VDI licensing and it only exists for the exclusive scenario of Windows desktops virtualized.
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
But maybe its still that Windows 10 Pro licenses can not be optained for this use outside of a large VL bulk purchase?
Not aware of anything like that. You can get them like one at a time.
-
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@scottalanmiller said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@bigbear said in Has Windows 10 VDI Licensing changed yet?:
@Dashrender Yup, but obsiously the VDI Server 2016 instances wouldnt be an option
Why not?
On Vultr I would assume not because they use KVM...
You mean that they don't provide GPU access? That they use KVM doesn't affect anything itself.
