Sunk Cost Fallacy?
-
At first glance, option 2 with migration phone by phone over time would make sense.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
At first glance, option 2 with migration phone by phone over time would make sense.
Option 2 is a Mitel VoIP enabled system. So he is keeping his vendor lock in.
-
What is generating the costs for the FreePBX system?
-
@coliver said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
What is generating the costs for the FreePBX system?
Looks like handsets. And maybe some wiring.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@coliver said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
What is generating the costs for the FreePBX system?
Looks like handsets. And maybe some wiring.
Hmm. Wonder how much of that would have to be done eventually anyway? I imagine that long term cost savings with a Foss PBX would outweigh the initial investment.
-
@coliver said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@coliver said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
What is generating the costs for the FreePBX system?
Looks like handsets. And maybe some wiring.
Hmm. Wonder how much of that would have to be done eventually anyway? I imagine that long term cost savings with a Foss PBX would outweigh the initial investment.
Easier to use, easier to support, no lift and shift down the road.....
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@coliver said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@coliver said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
What is generating the costs for the FreePBX system?
Looks like handsets. And maybe some wiring.
Hmm. Wonder how much of that would have to be done eventually anyway? I imagine that long term cost savings with a Foss PBX would outweigh the initial investment.
Easier to use, easier to support, no lift and shift down the road.....
I think these numbers are a bit biased and don't take into account potential savings. Maybe a 5 year cost comparison would be warranted.
-
@Dashrender said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
My current phone system looks like this.
Building 1
old digital system 60 phones
Building 2
VOIP, 39 ten year old phones
Building 3
VOIP, 18 two year old phones@Dashrender tell me if I got this right.
Building 1: Legacy Mitel system, supports SIP trunk and 60 digital phones.
Building 2: VoIP capable Mitel system with 39 SIP phones and SIP Trunk support
Building 3: VoIP capable Mitel system with 18 SIP phones and SIP Trunk support.
Not specified 1: How are the 3 systems trunking calls to each other.
Not specified 2: Are there legacy POTS line in use also. -
The issue with phones is that the current VoIP handsets are not SIP compliant and can't be used with a modern system?
-
So 117 total handsets? How many of those need to be physical?
-
Just doing really quick numbers, if you went with standard Sangoma SIP phones (the ones made by the FreePBX people) at default Amazon pricing (no bulk discounts or special rates) that would be under $8,800 to replace all 117 phones. Any old phone that still works will save money, any softphone that can be used will save money.
What's generating the $11,000 of unknown costs for option 4?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
Just doing really quick numbers, if you went with standard Sangoma SIP phones (the ones made by the FreePBX people) at default Amazon pricing (no bulk discounts or special rates) that would be under $8,800 to replace all 117 phones. Any old phone that still works will save money, any softphone that can be used will save money.
What's generating the $11,000 of unknown costs for option 4?
I assume that would be infrastructure updates... Running new wires to the location that the digital​, non-sip phones are.
But that's just year one costs. The year two costs will be effectively zero. I wonder what the maintenance for the mitel system ends up being.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
Just doing really quick numbers, if you went with standard Sangoma SIP phones (the ones made by the FreePBX people) at default Amazon pricing (no bulk discounts or special rates) that would be under $8,800 to replace all 117 phones. Any old phone that still works will save money, any softphone that can be used will save money.
What's generating the $11,000 of unknown costs for option 4?
That's not a great phone
-
@JaredBusch said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
Just doing really quick numbers, if you went with standard Sangoma SIP phones (the ones made by the FreePBX people) at default Amazon pricing (no bulk discounts or special rates) that would be under $8,800 to replace all 117 phones. Any old phone that still works will save money, any softphone that can be used will save money.
What's generating the $11,000 of unknown costs for option 4?
That's not a great phone
Bare bones for sure, but it works. Have you seen issues with it?
-
None of the same girl my phones have gigabit passed through until the $150 model. I simply do not see any good benefit to those low in phones you gain auto provisioning for free and I think one other thing from commercial model for free because
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@JaredBusch said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
Just doing really quick numbers, if you went with standard Sangoma SIP phones (the ones made by the FreePBX people) at default Amazon pricing (no bulk discounts or special rates) that would be under $8,800 to replace all 117 phones. Any old phone that still works will save money, any softphone that can be used will save money.
What's generating the $11,000 of unknown costs for option 4?
That's not a great phone
Bare bones for sure, but it works. Have you seen issues with it?
Specific to the case at hand I was recommending the T46S for the number of buttons to be comparable to their current phones for features
Those are 145 @ telephonydepot in bulk
-
Soft phones are almost never an actual option for general office workers none of them have spots for all the buttons to replicate a desk phone so you have to train users to put calls on park you have to train users to transfer with codes that shit just does not work in the real world
-
@JaredBusch said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
None of the same girl my phones have gigabit passed through until the $150 model. I simply do not see any good benefit to those low in phones you gain auto provisioning for free and I think one other thing from commercial model for free because
I hope that that is Siri talking.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
@JaredBusch said in Sunk Cost Fallacy?:
None of the same girl my phones have gigabit passed through until the $150 model. I simply do not see any good benefit to those low in phones you gain auto provisioning for free and I think one other thing from commercial model for free because
I hope that that is Siri talking.
Yeah S a in GOM a
-
I agree with Jared that using soft phones as the only replacement just isn't practical.
Ignoring the lack of features on most soft phones, user training would be a huge burden.
For the few users who are constantly traveling, sure give them a soft phone in addition to their office phone.
But the simple approach is a physical phone.
