Vultr adjusts its pricing
-
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@fuznutz04 said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@fuznutz04 said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, they can't get to the point where performance suffers. One way I could see that happening is if they "over-provision" their equipment.
What do you specifically mean by "staying viable?"
At some point they cut the cost so much that there is no profit in it.
Right, that would be terrible.
Which when you are selling things at $2.50, can happen all too easily.
Exactly.
-
Those margins are getting quite tiny.
-
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
Those margins are getting quite tiny.
The margins were already razor thing to begin with. Like everyone else, I really hope they make at least a little bit on the low tier.
-
@travisdh1 Let the market decide... Some of them will fail... The question is who?
-
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@travisdh1 Let the market decide... Some of them will fail... The question is who?
Yet Cloud at Cost is still around, somehow.
-
@travisdh1 said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
Those margins are getting quite tiny.
The margins were already razor thing to begin with. Like everyone else, I really hope they make at least a little bit on the low tier.
I have a feeling they hope a good percentage of servers never see production use. I would venture to guess that servers for tinkering, testing, or people who sign up for only 1-3 months build up nice revenue. They probably break even on production systems at that cost.
-
@travisdh1 said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@travisdh1 Let the market decide... Some of them will fail... The question is who?
Yet Cloud at Cost is still around, somehow.
I wonder why they didn't just rebrand after that nightmare?
-
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
-
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@travisdh1 Let the market decide... Some of them will fail... The question is who?
That's the scary bit. That's a lot of customers gambling on each one of them.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
Ya a few of my production servers are only 512MB.
-
@travisdh1 said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@travisdh1 Let the market decide... Some of them will fail... The question is who?
Yet Cloud at Cost is still around, somehow.
Are they? Were they ever around? Collecting money and being around isn't the same thing.
-
@IRJ said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@travisdh1 said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@travisdh1 Let the market decide... Some of them will fail... The question is who?
Yet Cloud at Cost is still around, somehow.
I wonder why they didn't just rebrand after that nightmare?
They probably do as a million other things, but they don't get rid of the old branding, just have multiple new ones. Any random VPS from Canada might be C@C rebranded.
-
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
Ya a few of my production servers are only 512MB.
Same here, our main jump server, for example.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
Ya a few of my production servers are only 512MB.
Same here, our main jump server, for example.
Our whole identity management system runs on 1GB. that covers up to 20,000 users
-
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
Ya a few of my production servers are only 512MB.
Same here, our main jump server, for example.
Our whole identity management system runs on 1GB. that covers up to 20,000 users
Nice. We have one legacy PBX that is still on 256MB, lol. It's really old and just waits for the customer in question to agree to a free upgrade. But it works fine that way, so they never bother!
-
For the record, it only needs 180MB normally.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
Ya a few of my production servers are only 512MB.
Same here, our main jump server, for example.
Our whole identity management system runs on 1GB. that covers up to 20,000 users
Nice. We have one legacy PBX that is still on 256MB, lol. It's really old and just waits for the customer in question to agree to a free upgrade. But it works fine that way, so they never bother!
Eh I lied. 2GB for the new Identity Management covers 10,000 users. I was thinking of the old one, and that may have only been 1/10,000. Still not too bad.
-
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@stacksofplates said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@aaronstuder said in Vultr adjusts its pricing:
@scottalanmiller Right, but how many people can use that limited of resources? I am guessing lots of upgrades.
A lot, actually. 512MB is enough to run a fully functional PBX, Jump Box or web server. It's amazing how often you could use that.
Ya a few of my production servers are only 512MB.
Same here, our main jump server, for example.
Our whole identity management system runs on 1GB. that covers up to 20,000 users
Nice. We have one legacy PBX that is still on 256MB, lol. It's really old and just waits for the customer in question to agree to a free upgrade. But it works fine that way, so they never bother!
Eh I lied. 2GB for the new Identity Management covers 10,000 users. I was thinking of the old one, and that may have only been 1/10,000. Still not too bad.
Maybe it just needed some tweaking. Which Linux distro is that on, Fedora?
-
This awoke me from my medicated slumber. Pretty cool!
