ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Mocking the Apple live event

    Water Closet
    apple
    7
    24
    3.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403 @Kelly
      last edited by

      @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

      TL;DL - We put a touch strip on the keyboard because we can't figure out how to make a touchscreen MacBook.

      haha .. .

      we added a smaller trackpad. . . and fingerprints fuck up the picture quality. . .

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Kelly
        last edited by

        @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

        TL;DL - We put a touch strip on the keyboard because we can't figure out how to make a touchscreen MacBook.

        Bwahahaha

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • crustachioC
          crustachio
          last edited by crustachio

          That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

          KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KellyK
            Kelly @crustachio
            last edited by

            @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

            That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

            I object generally to the presentation over the MBP itself or the TouchBar. That said, having the Touchbar so far up the on the keyboard doesn't make it very useful. The travel time from the natural rest point or from the mouse is far enough that only having the functionality of a single bar compared to an entire touch screen (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio) doesn't make the travel time worth it. This seems more gimmicky than terribly useful imo. Now, TouchID is worth it. That is a big deal, particularly for my company.

            crustachioC scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • crustachioC
              crustachio @Kelly
              last edited by

              @Kelly I appreciate your opinion, but I think it's important not to be dismissive until you try it. Many many people thought the concept of an entirely touchscreen phone with no physical keys was gimmicky as well.

              For keyboard warriors, this opens up the world of GUI-oriented contextual shortcuts without needing to memorize hundreds of keyboard shortcut combos per app. To say nothing of the completely unique UI opportunities that arise from hands-on manipulation of live controls, as demonstrated in the Photoshop and DJ demos.

              KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Kelly
                last edited by

                @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

                I object generally to the presentation over the MBP itself or the TouchBar. That said, having the Touchbar so far up the on the keyboard doesn't make it very useful. The travel time from the natural rest point or from the mouse is far enough that only having the functionality of a single bar compared to an entire touch screen (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio) doesn't make the travel time worth it. This seems more gimmicky than terribly useful imo. Now, TouchID is worth it. That is a big deal, particularly for my company.

                Isn't that the same thing that makes touch screens so bad?

                KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • KellyK
                  Kelly @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                  @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                  @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                  That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

                  I object generally to the presentation over the MBP itself or the TouchBar. That said, having the Touchbar so far up the on the keyboard doesn't make it very useful. The travel time from the natural rest point or from the mouse is far enough that only having the functionality of a single bar compared to an entire touch screen (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio) doesn't make the travel time worth it. This seems more gimmicky than terribly useful imo. Now, TouchID is worth it. That is a big deal, particularly for my company.

                  Isn't that the same thing that makes touch screens so bad?

                  I've heard you expound on this perspective, and I don't necessarily agree with it. On a smaller sized laptops, keyboard+touchscreen is very usable, and for many, is more intuitive than keyboard+mouse. It doesn't have the same precision as a mouse, but for many usages it is faster and more intuitive than traveling from keyboard to mouse and back.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Kelly
                    last edited by

                    @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                    @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                    @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                    That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

                    I object generally to the presentation over the MBP itself or the TouchBar. That said, having the Touchbar so far up the on the keyboard doesn't make it very useful. The travel time from the natural rest point or from the mouse is far enough that only having the functionality of a single bar compared to an entire touch screen (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio) doesn't make the travel time worth it. This seems more gimmicky than terribly useful imo. Now, TouchID is worth it. That is a big deal, particularly for my company.

                    Isn't that the same thing that makes touch screens so bad?

                    I've heard you expound on this perspective, and I don't necessarily agree with it. On a smaller sized laptops, keyboard+touchscreen is very usable, and for many, is more intuitive than keyboard+mouse. It doesn't have the same precision as a mouse, but for many usages it is faster and more intuitive than traveling from keyboard to mouse and back.

                    The point that bothers me, though, is the long travel time between my fingers and the screen. It's very awkward to use a keyboard and touch screen.

                    KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • KellyK
                      Kelly @crustachio
                      last edited by

                      @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                      @Kelly I appreciate your opinion, but I think it's important not to be dismissive until you try it. Many many people thought the concept of an entirely touchscreen phone with no physical keys was gimmicky as well.

                      For keyboard warriors, this opens up the world of GUI-oriented contextual shortcuts without needing to memorize hundreds of keyboard shortcut combos per app. To say nothing of the completely unique UI opportunities that arise from hands-on manipulation of live controls, as demonstrated in the Photoshop and DJ demos.

                      I am reserving full judgement until I can get my hands on one, but it seems from this end to be more of a gimmick. Again, my mockery was aimed primarily at the presentation and not the actual thing.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • KellyK
                        Kelly @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                        @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                        @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                        @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                        That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

                        I object generally to the presentation over the MBP itself or the TouchBar. That said, having the Touchbar so far up the on the keyboard doesn't make it very useful. The travel time from the natural rest point or from the mouse is far enough that only having the functionality of a single bar compared to an entire touch screen (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio) doesn't make the travel time worth it. This seems more gimmicky than terribly useful imo. Now, TouchID is worth it. That is a big deal, particularly for my company.

                        Isn't that the same thing that makes touch screens so bad?

                        I've heard you expound on this perspective, and I don't necessarily agree with it. On a smaller sized laptops, keyboard+touchscreen is very usable, and for many, is more intuitive than keyboard+mouse. It doesn't have the same precision as a mouse, but for many usages it is faster and more intuitive than traveling from keyboard to mouse and back.

                        The point that bothers me, though, is the long travel time between my fingers and the screen. It's very awkward to use a keyboard and touch screen.

                        Keyboard to screen is faster/easier in general usage for me than keyboard to mouse, and faster than keyboard and trackpad. YMMV.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Kelly
                          last edited by

                          @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                          @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                          @Kelly said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                          @crustachio said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                          That Photoshop demo was legit. Mock if you wish, but this is a great arrow in the quiver for power users in almost any context.

                          I object generally to the presentation over the MBP itself or the TouchBar. That said, having the Touchbar so far up the on the keyboard doesn't make it very useful. The travel time from the natural rest point or from the mouse is far enough that only having the functionality of a single bar compared to an entire touch screen (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio) doesn't make the travel time worth it. This seems more gimmicky than terribly useful imo. Now, TouchID is worth it. That is a big deal, particularly for my company.

                          Isn't that the same thing that makes touch screens so bad?

                          I've heard you expound on this perspective, and I don't necessarily agree with it. On a smaller sized laptops, keyboard+touchscreen is very usable, and for many, is more intuitive than keyboard+mouse. It doesn't have the same precision as a mouse, but for many usages it is faster and more intuitive than traveling from keyboard to mouse and back.

                          The point that bothers me, though, is the long travel time between my fingers and the screen. It's very awkward to use a keyboard and touch screen.

                          Keyboard to screen is faster/easier in general usage for me than keyboard to mouse, and faster than keyboard and trackpad. YMMV.

                          I don't have to leave my keyboard to use the trackpad, though (except on a Mac, their touchpads blow) and going to the mouse is easier because it is lateral elbow joint movement rather than linear shoulder movement with a hovering hand.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • s.hacklemanS
                            s.hackleman
                            last edited by

                            Maybe I'm OCD, but I don't want anyones nasty fingers on my monitor.. especially my own.

                            scottalanmillerS MattSpellerM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @s.hackleman
                              last edited by

                              @s.hackleman said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                              ..... I don't want anyones nasty fingers on my monitor.. especially my own......

                              ...monitor.

                              s.hacklemanS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • s.hacklemanS
                                s.hackleman @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                                @s.hackleman said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                                ..... I don't want anyones nasty fingers on my monitor.. especially my own......

                                ...monitor.

                                Screen.. monitor..LCD display device... if it is for looking it isn't for touching. 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • MattSpellerM
                                  MattSpeller @s.hackleman
                                  last edited by MattSpeller

                                  @s.hackleman said in Mocking the Apple live event:

                                  Maybe I'm OCD, but I don't want anyones nasty fingers on my monitor.. especially my own.

                                  Disinfects and removes grime - even the crustiest user filth.

                                  0_1477606306096_20161027_150943.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1
                                  • 2
                                  • 1 / 2
                                  • First post
                                    Last post