ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    23 Posts 5 Posters 2.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • travisdh1T
      travisdh1 @wirestyle22
      last edited by

      @wirestyle22 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

      @travisdh1 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

      @wirestyle22 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

      Can an OS even support that much space?

      IRIX was supporting petabyte+ size file systems in the 90s, doubt that 60TB will be an issue, unless you insist on using ext4 with the odd limitations placed on that.

      I honestly didn't know. There could have been a weird way to make that work with pooling etc. A petabyte on a single server is a lot.

      I am talking about a whole other class of hardware, the stuff that starts at a full rack and expands from there.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • wirestyle22W
        wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

        @wirestyle22 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

        @travisdh1 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

        @wirestyle22 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

        Can an OS even support that much space?

        IRIX was supporting petabyte+ size file systems in the 90s, doubt that 60TB will be an issue, unless you insist on using ext4 with the odd limitations placed on that.

        I honestly didn't know. There could have been a weird way to make that work with pooling etc. A petabyte on a single server is a lot.

        It's a lot for a single server to hold, not a lot for a filesystem to handle. ZFS is for zettabytes of data, petabytes aren't even on the radar of concern. And ZFS is more than a decade old.

        That is wild. Thanks

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          If Sun's ZFS monster, the 2005 Thumper's SATA controllers could handle these drives, or if we use some of SuperMIcro's gear... we'd be looking at things like 2.7PB usable in a single 4U server today!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • wirestyle22W
            wirestyle22
            last edited by

            Do we know what the IOPS is?

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
              last edited by

              @wirestyle22 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

              Do we know what the IOPS is?

              No

              wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • wirestyle22W
                wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                @wirestyle22 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                Do we know what the IOPS is?

                No

                You're not going to jump on me over latency of the drive etc? All of the other considerations that go into hard drives? I'm surprised. You must like me

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Found it, 150K

                  travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • travisdh1T
                    travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                    Found it, 150K

                    I didn't see, is that thing SATA, SAS or pcie connected? That makes sense with a SATA drive, isn't that close to the max you can push over a SATA bus?

                    scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                      https://mangolassi.it/topic/10217/seagate-sas-ssd-hits-60tb-capacity

                      Literally they were posted back to back...dammit!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                        last edited by

                        @travisdh1 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                        Found it, 150K

                        I didn't see, is that thing SATA, SAS or pcie connected? That makes sense with a SATA drive, isn't that close to the max you can push over a SATA bus?

                        SAS

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @travisdh1
                          last edited by

                          @travisdh1 said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                          Found it, 150K

                          I didn't see, is that thing SATA, SAS or pcie connected? That makes sense with a SATA drive, isn't that close to the max you can push over a SATA bus?

                          SATA and SAS can do a lot of IOPS, it's bandwidth where they are most limited.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            I'm surprised this thing is SAS, but maybe the bandwidth isn't the issue, just sheer storage is?

                            With things like this, I see a time in the very near future where nothing ever captured will ever be destroyed, deleted.

                            travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • travisdh1T
                              travisdh1 @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @Dashrender said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                              I'm surprised this thing is SAS, but maybe the bandwidth isn't the issue, just sheer storage is?

                              With things like this, I see a time in the very near future where nothing ever captured will ever be destroyed, deleted.

                              We're well past the point that I've heard that predicted for, I forget the exact time, but in the early 2000s is what I heard. With the new NSA data centers, that prediction looks prescient to me.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                Hmm.. .I hear what you are saying... but I thought I heard that the amount of data created daily would still fill that NSA data center in like 4 years.. soooooo.....

                                travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • travisdh1T
                                  travisdh1 @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said in Seagate Reveals 60TB SSD:

                                  Hmm.. .I hear what you are saying... but I thought I heard that the amount of data created daily would still fill that NSA data center in like 4 years.. soooooo.....

                                  You think they only built the one?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • wirestyle22W
                                    wirestyle22
                                    last edited by wirestyle22

                                    We really need an alternative power source. Powering all of these data centers is a lot. Pretty soon the earth is just going to be rows and rows of racks. Like that episode of Silicon Valley. We're just going to be mole people.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 1 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post