@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.
Is it any weirder than the NT 4.0 setup you wrote about above?
The changes were so drastic in SP1 that it barely resembled the RTM.
Yes, because the terms were not explicitly to mean that until after NT.
