ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    So, there was a RC "drone" hovering above my house yesterday...I was kinda pissed.

    Water Closet
    12
    105
    19.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Rob DunnR
      Rob Dunn
      last edited by Rob Dunn

      Yeah...wasn't too happy about that.

      My family and I were spending some nice quiet time in our yard, and all of the sudden, we hear a faint buzzing/whirring noise coming from above. We look up, and there was a 3' drone hovering between ours and our neighbor's house at about 200' up or so.

      It hovered there for about 5 minutes then drifted down the street at the same height for another 5 minutes. I waited for the unit to head home (the battery has a limited life) and went over to the guy's house who was flying it.

      Turns out, he flies them commercially and was honestly confused as to why I would have a problem with it flying over my house.

      I told him I didn't like it because:

      • I have no idea who is controlling the drone, therefore...
      • ...I don't know if there is a camera (usually there are)...if there is...
      • ...I don't know if the camera is recording...even if it isn't recording...
      • ...I have two small children, I don't like the idea of someone watching them or my wife
      • Noise - Hearing a buzz overhead for minutes at a time is not conducive to a relaxing evening in the yard after work
      • Safety concern - If the battery dies or there is a mechanical issue, the thing could come crashing down into my yard. If so, is it mine if I decide to be an a-hole?

      He was cool with not flying it over my house after I asked him not to - but still...what do you guys think of this? To me, there's a psychological aspect to this that separates a drone from an RC airplane...the fact that it hovers.

      Have you had any experiences like this?

      scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User
        last edited by A Former User

        legally as long as you can still see it while you're flying the person flying is okay, 400ft altitude is the highest allowed. You don't own the airspace over your house just as if a airplan, helicopter or anything else flies over. Nothing you can do about it.

        RC Helicopters have been able to hover for many many years, not just drones. It just takes a lot more skill to fly the helicopters than the drones which about anyone can fly (and crash as well), drones tend to be more dangerous just because there is less learning curve so the people flying them don't really know what they are doing most of them time or understand how they work (and how wind and weather effects them).

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Rob DunnR
          Rob Dunn
          last edited by

          Yeah, I know about the height restriction. TBH, I would be just as annoyed had it been an RC helicopter, but there aren't any of those in the neighborhood - it's been pretty quiet for the last 12 years we've lived here and I'm not keen on having these things buzzing over my head when I'm looking to relax with a beer.

          Honest question here: Legally, what's stopping me from shooting it out of the sky with a high-powered pellet gun (aside from me being a generally nice guy on any given day)?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Rob DunnR
            Rob Dunn
            last edited by Rob Dunn

            ...I'm not entirely convinced he had line of sight on it the entire time he was flying it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Rob Dunn
              last edited by

              @Rob-Dunn said:

              Honest question here: Legally, what's stopping me from shooting it out of the sky with a high-powered pellet gun (aside from me being a generally nice guy on any given day)?

              If it is on your property, nothing.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Rob Dunn
                last edited by

                @Rob-Dunn said:

                To me, there's a psychological aspect to this that separates a drone from an RC airplane...the fact that it hovers.

                I think this derails the conversation. Would you be okay with a slow flying, camera wielding, battery powered, might crash into you, video recording RC plane flying around your property? That it is hovering or moving in a line really isn't important. What is is whether or not you have the right to keep people "off of your property". Having a drone up in the air on your own property is one thing. But on someone else's is quite different.

                Plus, if it is on your property and you tell it to leave and it doesn't, it's trespassing, right? He's been informed that he has to leave. That he isn't listening isn't your problem.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  legally as long as you can still see it while you're flying the person flying is okay, 400ft altitude is the highest allowed. You don't own the airspace over your house just as if a airplan, helicopter or anything else flies over. Nothing you can do about it.

                  But airspace has a minimum, right? You can't be an inch over the ground. Otherwise a hovercraft would have the right to anywhere, anytime. They could run a red light and tell the cops "tough, I'm an aircraft."

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    I thought that to qualify for "right of airspace" that you had to be high enough to qualify as "flying".

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      Looks like I was right. The drone was likely trespassing. It was within the airspace that you clearly own above your property.

                      http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/07/photographer_george_steinmetz_arrest_how_much_airspace_do_you_own.html

                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Rob Dunn
                        last edited by

                        @Rob-Dunn said:

                        Turns out, he flies them commercially and was honestly confused as to why I would have a problem with it flying over my house.

                        There is no reasonable possibility that he was confused about why you have a problem with this. If he has so much as heard of a drone he has to have heard about the massive about of legal and ethical controversy around them and how upset people are about them and how there are all kinds of laws and rules both existing and being considered. That he claims to do this commercially leaves exactly zero possibility that he really was surprised here.

                        He was bluffing hoping that you didn't call the cops.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by A Former User

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          it's trespassing, right? He's been informed that he has to leave.

                          That's not trespassing in anyway. It's completely legal to do so.

                          scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @A Former User
                            last edited by

                            @thecreativeone91 said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            it's trespassing, right? He's been informed that he has to leave.

                            That's not trespassing in anyway.

                            It is according to an aviation lawyer: "If you were to take your Parrot drone over my house, I suppose at one level, it is a trespass," he said. "You were not invited there and could potentially have disrupted my quiet enjoyment of my home. I suppose I could sue."

                            http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/10/if-i-fly-a-uav-over-my-neighbors-house-is-it-trespassing/263431/

                            What makes you feel that it is not trespassing? It meets all the qualifications of which I am aware.

                            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @A Former User
                              last edited by

                              @thecreativeone91 said:

                              It's completely legal to do so.

                              According to whom? This isn't supported in anything I am finding. Since we've determined, according to the references at least, that you do indeed own the usable airspace around your house and that being in that airspace uninvited is trespassing and drones fall into that category.... where was an exception made for drones?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                Looks like I was right. The drone was likely trespassing. It was within the airspace that you clearly own above your property.

                                http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/07/photographer_george_steinmetz_arrest_how_much_airspace_do_you_own.html

                                No, you did not read the article fully if that's what you got out of it. 200ft would be out of the airspace you own. Also in the case of the article he was also trespassing for taking off from the land. This article was also written before the FAA re-wrote it's rules.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  it's trespassing, right? He's been informed that he has to leave.

                                  That's not trespassing in anyway.

                                  It is according to an aviation lawyer: "If you were to take your Parrot drone over my house, I suppose at one level, it is a trespass," he said. "You were not invited there and could potentially have disrupted my quiet enjoyment of my home. I suppose I could sue."

                                  Sure you can sue for anything.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    @thecreativeone91 said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    Looks like I was right. The drone was likely trespassing. It was within the airspace that you clearly own above your property.

                                    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/07/photographer_george_steinmetz_arrest_how_much_airspace_do_you_own.html

                                    No, you did not read the article fully if that's what you got out of it. 200ft would be out of the airspace you own. Also in the case of the article he was also trespassing for taking off from the land. This article was also written before the FAA re-wrote it's rules.

                                    In the article it said that under 500ft was normally considered YOUR airspace, and the drone was well within that space.

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Here is another article listing both trespass and nuisance laws and being potentially applicable when within your airspace.

                                      http://www.agweb.com/article/legal_ease_drones_and_the_law_NAA_John_Dillard-john-dillard/

                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        A Former User @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        @thecreativeone91 said:

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        Looks like I was right. The drone was likely trespassing. It was within the airspace that you clearly own above your property.

                                        http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/07/photographer_george_steinmetz_arrest_how_much_airspace_do_you_own.html

                                        No, you did not read the article fully if that's what you got out of it. 200ft would be out of the airspace you own. Also in the case of the article he was also trespassing for taking off from the land. This article was also written before the FAA re-wrote it's rules.

                                        In the article it said that under 500ft was normally considered YOUR airspace, and the drone was well within that space.

                                        Re-read it. It did not say that. It said it considered changing to that. It said it was somewhere between 80-500ft depending on the height of the buildings.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @A Former User
                                          last edited by

                                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          Looks like I was right. The drone was likely trespassing. It was within the airspace that you clearly own above your property.

                                          http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/07/photographer_george_steinmetz_arrest_how_much_airspace_do_you_own.html

                                          No, you did not read the article fully if that's what you got out of it. 200ft would be out of the airspace you own. Also in the case of the article he was also trespassing for taking off from the land. This article was also written before the FAA re-wrote it's rules.

                                          In the article it said that under 500ft was normally considered YOUR airspace, and the drone was well within that space.

                                          Re-read it. It did not say that. It said it considered changing to that. It said it was somewhere between 80-500ft depending on the height of the buildings.

                                          Yes, but 500ft was the more commonly accepted.

                                          Regardless, it is within the airspace that mostly is considered yours. Sure, any judge might hate you and rule something ridiculous, but the law seems pretty clear that the use of drones in ways that are generally a nuisance is likely trespassing.

                                          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ?
                                            A Former User @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            Here is another article listing both trespass and nuisance laws and being potentially applicable when within your airspace.

                                            http://www.agweb.com/article/legal_ease_drones_and_the_law_NAA_John_Dillard-john-dillard/

                                            He also says that the law isn't clear about it being trespassing.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 1 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post