ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    My CloudatCost Wishlist

    IT Discussion
    cloudatcost
    10
    38
    7.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      And, of course, OpenSuse and FreeBSD offerings 🙂

      What about Upload your own temporary ISO? that might be asking for abuse though.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @A Former User
        last edited by

        @thecreativeone91 said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        And, of course, OpenSuse and FreeBSD offerings 🙂

        What about Upload your own temporary ISO? that might be asking for abuse though.

        No cloud provider offers that that I know. It causes a lot of complications. It's a nice idea, but not ultimately very practical.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • lanceL
          lance
          last edited by

          @AmanBhogal Does cloudatcost offer 2FA?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            No, have not see any two factor authentication.

            lanceL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • lanceL
              lance @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said:

              No, have not see any two factor authentication.

              Bummer. Good thing to add to the wishlist 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Reid CooperR
                Reid Cooper
                last edited by

                I agree, 2FA would be nice to have. Maybe just something simple like Google's 2FA system?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Not high on my list, but I would like to see that too. I agree to Google, I use that already and like it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    However, here is a concern. As a company user, not an individual, 2FA would break the ability for other members of my team to log in and use the service too. Before 2FA can be implemented I think that multiple user support has to be.

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      However, here is a concern. As a company user, not an individual, 2FA would break the ability for other members of my team to log in and use the service too. Before 2FA can be implemented I think that multiple user support has to be.

                      Why? as long as the 2FA is tied to your logon you should be fine.
                      Any reason they can't create multiple logons to the servers your company buys?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        However, here is a concern. As a company user, not an individual, 2FA would break the ability for other members of my team to log in and use the service too. Before 2FA can be implemented I think that multiple user support has to be.

                        Why? as long as the 2FA is tied to your logon you should be fine.
                        Any reason they can't create multiple logons to the servers your company buys?

                        Because 2FA only works for one user (normally.) If you have Google, Aladdin, SafeWord, RSA ID, etc. you have to physically have a device. If I have that with me and Art or Greg need access to the account.... what do we do?

                        Most cloud services don't offer multiple users, it's a problem. Rackspace is the same way and it is crippling. You have to use shared accounts for cloud access!!

                        ? DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @Dashrender said:

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          However, here is a concern. As a company user, not an individual, 2FA would break the ability for other members of my team to log in and use the service too. Before 2FA can be implemented I think that multiple user support has to be.

                          Why? as long as the 2FA is tied to your logon you should be fine.
                          Any reason they can't create multiple logons to the servers your company buys?

                          Because 2FA only works for one user (normally.) If you have Google, Aladdin, SafeWord, RSA ID, etc. you have to physically have a device. If I have that with me and Art or Greg need access to the account.... what do we do?

                          Most cloud services don't offer multiple users, it's a problem. Rackspace is the same way and it is crippling. You have to use shared accounts for cloud access!!

                          You could create 2FA at the OS level in your cloud instance as you can add more users. They just wouldn't have access to the control panel

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            However, here is a concern. As a company user, not an individual, 2FA would break the ability for other members of my team to log in and use the service too. Before 2FA can be implemented I think that multiple user support has to be.

                            Why? as long as the 2FA is tied to your logon you should be fine.
                            Any reason they can't create multiple logons to the servers your company buys?

                            Because 2FA only works for one user (normally.) If you have Google, Aladdin, SafeWord, RSA ID, etc. you have to physically have a device. If I have that with me and Art or Greg need access to the account.... what do we do?

                            Most cloud services don't offer multiple users, it's a problem. Rackspace is the same way and it is crippling. You have to use shared accounts for cloud access!!

                            Wow, that sounds like a HUGE flaw! How do you know does what? In something as critical as cloud services to be without this basic security logging seems unthinkable!

                            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said:
                              Rackspace is the same way and it is crippling. You have to use shared accounts for cloud access!!

                              This has always bothered me. Rackspace does this for most of their services.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                Yes, except for the metal machines. That's one of my biggest complaints with Rackspace. The performance, price and easy of use are great.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User
                                  last edited by A Former User

                                  The Static IP should stay the same even when re-imaging the instance.

                                  DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller you need authy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • DanpD
                                      Danp @A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      @thecreativeone91 said:

                                      The Static IP should stay the same even when re-imaging the instance.

                                      Or at least give you the choice to either keep or change it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        Buying a perm IP address was an option, I thought that I saw. The changing IP address is part of the cloud nature of the service. In a pure cloud model, changing IP addresses isn't really an issue.

                                        Although what is missing is a load balancer option.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • JaredBuschJ
                                          JaredBusch
                                          last edited by

                                          Why can I not re-image a machine when it is shutdown? This makes no sense. If I am going to click re-image, I obviously do not care about the existing system. Why do I need to turn it on?

                                          wtf

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                            last edited by

                                            @JaredBusch that should be an easy thing for them to modify.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post