ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    1984 is Here, Samsung Smart TV is Monitoring You

    News
    security
    15
    48
    10.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      It's funny, Steve Gibson talked about this on his Podcast Security Now! He basically said it's nothing to worry about because it's already happening everywhere else anyhow, and besides, they couldn't possibly be sending every single bit of recorded data back to the vendor (third party) they wouldn't have enough bandwidth...

      Sadly Steve Gibson just lost some respect in my eyes today!

      tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • tonyshowoffT
        tonyshowoff @Dashrender
        last edited by tonyshowoff

        @Dashrender Perhaps if the assumption is that it's unpacked, uncompressed high definition or something. You can send audio at like 16kbps quality and it's still fairly decent, and video not much higher. I don't know why he'd suggest that at all.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @Nic
          last edited by

          @Nic said:

          Good lord, it just keeps getting worse: http://slashdot.org/submission/4197957/samsung-what-is-my-smarttv-reporting-to-whom

          The site said:

          A wireshark capture shows that remote sites are trying to access my TV until I turn it on,

          Wait, how's that possible? If the TV didn't send out any requests, how are requests getting back to his TV? He mentioned that he was behind a router.

          tonyshowoffT scottalanmillerS NicN 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • tonyshowoffT
            tonyshowoff @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender It seems to say:

            "The TV continues sending data for several more seconds after the set appears to be off."

            So, it doesn't matter that it's behind the router if it's coming from the TV itself, instead of the other way around.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              @Nic said:

              Good lord, it just keeps getting worse: http://slashdot.org/submission/4197957/samsung-what-is-my-smarttv-reporting-to-whom

              The site said:

              A wireshark capture shows that remote sites are trying to access my TV until I turn it on,

              Wait, how's that possible? If the TV didn't send out any requests, how are requests getting back to his TV? He mentioned that he was behind a router.

              "Off" in television terms normally means that the logic is still on.

              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                "Off" in television terms normally means that the logic is still on.

                Sure, I know that, but the author didn't mention that the TV made a request before that flood of pre turned on packets. He's trying to make it sound worse than it is..

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  "Off" in television terms normally means that the logic is still on.

                  Sure, I know that, but the author didn't mention that the TV made a request before that flood of pre turned on packets. He's trying to make it sound worse than it is..

                  Maybe, or maybe he is trying to make it sound better than it is by leaving out that the TV made a DLNA request and opened ports on the firewall.

                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @Dashrender said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    "Off" in television terms normally means that the logic is still on.

                    Sure, I know that, but the author didn't mention that the TV made a request before that flood of pre turned on packets. He's trying to make it sound worse than it is..

                    Maybe, or maybe he is trying to make it sound better than it is by leaving out that the TV made a DLNA request and opened ports on the firewall.

                    OMG, I hadn't considered that - and it's entirely possible, na likely!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • DominicaD
                      Dominica
                      last edited by

                      Just creepy.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • SeanExabloxS
                        SeanExablox
                        last edited by

                        I also prefer my TVs to be 'dumb' and in 2D. How many people cover up the cameras on their monitors or laptops? I don't

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @SeanExablox
                          last edited by

                          @SeanExablox I worked at a place where everyone did. Every tablet, every laptop had their cameras taped over because everyone was convinced that the company was using the devices to spy on the employees. People would pull the batteries out of their Blackberries anytime they didn't need them to guarantee that the camera couldn't be turned on secretly.

                          SeanExabloxS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • SeanExabloxS
                            SeanExablox @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller so that's a function of not trusting the company, not a 'boogey man' or the manufacturer spying on you.

                            Did everyone decorate their camera stickers 🙂

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @SeanExablox
                              last edited by

                              @SeanExablox said:

                              @scottalanmiller so that's a function of not trusting the company, not a 'boogey man' or the manufacturer spying on you.

                              Did everyone decorate their camera stickers 🙂

                              Nope, just tape and white paper.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                julian @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                I prefer my TVs to be "dumb", just monitors.

                                Likewise. The same goes with cars, though I also feel this way because car and television manufacturers are pretty godawful at creating a good interface.

                                Last time I had a GPS device, the wanted $299 and a US shipping address to deliver the map update package, a digital asset. Why bother when the interface and maps are updated for free by Google?

                                SeanExabloxS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • SeanExabloxS
                                  SeanExablox @julian
                                  last edited by

                                  @julian my Jetta came with GPS, but I never use it. iPhone & Waze is the go to.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • NicN
                                    Nic @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    Better and better - your voice traffic isn't even encrypted:
                                    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/17/samsung_smart_tv_privacy_rewind/

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Nic
                                      last edited by

                                      @Nic fail

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch
                                        last edited by

                                        WTF, they use 443 but do not encrypt. lazy pricks.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • 1
                                        • 2
                                        • 3
                                        • 2 / 3
                                        • First post
                                          Last post