ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VitalPBX

    IT Discussion
    4
    23
    1.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
      last edited by

      @jaredbusch said in VitalPBX:

      @scottalanmiller said in VitalPBX:

      @jaredbusch said in VitalPBX:

      @frankengeek said in VitalPBX:

      My decision to look else ware is based on where I see FreePBX going.

      This is something I am worried about, also.

      I would be surprised if Sangoma didn't take care of it, but the code base is such a mess, I'd want to start over if I was Sangoma.

      IMO, Sangoma bought something that looked good on the outside, but the underside was a disaster.

      My guess is that they knew that, or guessed at it. It's FOSS so they should have known. I'm guessing that FreePBX had so much marketshare that they decided that it was worth it on that basis alone.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F
        FrankenGeek @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @jaredbusch LOL so true brother

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          PitzKey
          last edited by

          IMO: Sangoma can still achieve a nice recovery if they get their hands real dirty and don't rest until they clean up or rewrite huge chunks of FreePBX.
          I don't know the current development team, but Matt Fredrickson, Lorne Gaetz, Mike White and others involved in the project who I know, are truly amazing people and want to make FreePBX better. If they leave Sangoma, we can officially say RIP FreePBX.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 1
          • 2
          • 2 / 2
          • First post
            Last post