ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Non-IT News Thread

    Water Closet
    91
    11.2k
    5.5m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bnrstnr @mlnews
      last edited by

      @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

      Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

      Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
      The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

      The link is to a random post in this thread

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
        last edited by

        @bnrstnr said in Non-IT News Thread:

        @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

        Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

        Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
        The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

        The link is to a random post in this thread

        It was actually no link at all and that's the behaviour of a linkless post.

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @bnrstnr said in Non-IT News Thread:

          @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

          Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

          Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
          The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

          The link is to a random post in this thread

          It was actually no link at all and that's the behaviour of a linkless post.

          Incorrect.
          Whoever posted that put the brackets around it and the empty parentheses after. That is intentionally a link to nowhere. It is 100% user error and no function of the platform.

          30CB3F1C-15EA-43CE-A51F-67A9D04F4EC9.jpeg

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
            last edited by

            @JaredBusch said in Non-IT News Thread:

            Incorrect.
            Whoever posted that put the brackets around it and the empty parentheses after. That is intentionally a link to nowhere. It is 100% user error and no function of the platform.

            When you create the link but don't fill it in, as you describe, the behaviour of the platform is to send the link back to this thread.

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

              @JaredBusch said in Non-IT News Thread:

              Incorrect.
              Whoever posted that put the brackets around it and the empty parentheses after. That is intentionally a link to nowhere. It is 100% user error and no function of the platform.

              When you create the link but don't fill it in, as you describe, the behaviour of the platform is to send the link back to this thread.

              The point is why did the creator click the link button but not enter a URL. It is a user issue. If you are not going to use a URL, don’t click the fucking button.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                And?

                That means his claims of profitability were false.

                Not exactly - not if he had old losses he could still use to reduce current profits...

                B scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bnrstnr @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                  Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                  Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                  The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                  And?

                  That means his claims of profitability were false.

                  Not exactly - not if he had old losses he could still use to reduce current profits...

                  Seriously? I've paid more than $750 every single year since I worked part time in high school making minimum wage.

                  So his losses were so dramatic that he paid $750 one year, and nothing at all 10 out of the previous 15 years? Sounds exactly like his claims of profitability were false...

                  What a joke that people like you still defend this clown.

                  scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                    Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                    Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                    The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                    And?

                    That means his claims of profitability were false.

                    Not exactly - not if he had old losses he could still use to reduce current profits...

                    That's still losses. It means his losses are so epic, he's not still earned enough to cover them.

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
                      last edited by

                      @bnrstnr said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                      Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                      Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                      The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                      And?

                      That means his claims of profitability were false.

                      Not exactly - not if he had old losses he could still use to reduce current profits...

                      Seriously? I've paid more than $750 every single year since I worked part time in high school making minimum wage.

                      So his losses were so dramatic that he paid $750 one year, and nothing at all 10 out of the previous 15 years? Sounds exactly like his claims of profitability were false...

                      Correct, it means that not only has he not been profitable for 15 years, but his losses were so big before that that he's not managed to make up for them in all this time. So likely 20+ years of not making money.

                      Given his history of losses and bankruptcy, it's not surprising. He's long been famous for being unable to make money no matter how much is given to him. Prior to his reality TV shows, his claim to fame was how much he could lose. He's long been the example of when the rich can't stay rich, but always get bailed out by other rich families - even back in the 1980s, that's how we knew him.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • mlnewsM
                        mlnews
                        last edited by

                        Armenia says its fighter jet 'shot down by Turkey'

                        Armenia says one of its fighter jets was shot down by a Turkish jet, in a major escalation in the conflict over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region.
                        The Armenian foreign ministry said the pilot of the Soviet-made SU-25 died after being hit by the Turkish F-16 in Armenian air space. Turkey, which is backing Azerbaijan in the conflict, has denied the claim. Nearly 100 people, including civilians, have died in three days of fighting over the disputed mountainous region. The enclave is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan, but has been run by ethnic Armenians since a 1988-94 war between the two former Soviet republics. Azerbaijan has repeatedly stated that its air force does not have F-16 fighter jets. However, Turkey does. The fighting that started three days ago now appears to be spilling out of Nagorno-Karabakh.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @bnrstnr
                          last edited by

                          @bnrstnr said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                          Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                          Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                          The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                          And?

                          That means his claims of profitability were false.

                          Not exactly - not if he had old losses he could still use to reduce current profits...

                          Seriously? I've paid more than $750 every single year since I worked part time in high school making minimum wage.

                          So his losses were so dramatic that he paid $750 one year, and nothing at all 10 out of the previous 15 years? Sounds exactly like his claims of profitability were false...

                          What a joke that people like you still defend this clown.

                          Who's defending - don't look at someone trying to ensure people understand reality the same as defending a dipshit.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @Dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                            Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                            Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                            The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                            And?

                            That means his claims of profitability were false.

                            Not exactly - not if he had old losses he could still use to reduce current profits...

                            That's still losses. It means his losses are so epic, he's not still earned enough to cover them.

                            I've NEVER said he was a financial genius...

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • pmonchoP
                              pmoncho @mlnews
                              last edited by

                              @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                              Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                              Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                              The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                              Ummm... Shouldn't the question be how did the NY Times obtain a copy of private confidential tax records?

                              Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public. Isn't that technically something that anyone here that worries about Information Security have a big issue with?????

                              scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                                last edited by scottalanmiller

                                @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                                Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                                The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                                Ummm... Shouldn't the question be how did the NY Times obtain a copy of private confidential tax records?

                                Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public. Isn't that technically something that anyone here that worries about Information Security have a big issue with?????

                                There is a lot of assumption in that. First of all, this is NOT private information, it's public information for national security. I'm concerned that anyone is allowed to run this country without this being public, in fact, it's essentially treason. Anyone doing so without showing that they are eligible for office, isn't actually eligible for office.

                                Second, you don't know how this information was obtained. By the logic that "all news is private" we undermine the constitution. The public has a right to know public data. And news has the right to investigate. There can be information obtained illegally, but we have no reason to suspect that. So using the "must show sources" argument doesn't work because it undermines basic American / Constitutional freedoms and protections.

                                pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                                  last edited by

                                  @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                  Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public.

                                  Are we concerned that the information is partial? Yes. Whose fault is that? Blame the people forcing it to be partial, not the people informing the public.

                                  pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                                    last edited by

                                    @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                    Shouldn't the question be how did the NY Times obtain a copy of private confidential tax records?

                                    First Amendment rights are assumed in most cases to have shield law protection. So no, until a federal court, with the oversight of a grand jury, determines that the shield must be breached for reasons such as national security or safety, that shouldn't be the question. It's in the most fundamental statutes of American law that "how" the truth comes out isn't what matters, but that the truth is divulged to keep the public informed - because if the public isn't aware of the truth, they cannot be free. There is no freedom without truth, conceptually one that can't find out the truth is kept as a prisoner because their reality is controlled by others and they cannot have freedom.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • pmonchoP
                                      pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                      @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                      @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                      Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                                      Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                                      The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                                      Ummm... Shouldn't the question be how did the NY Times obtain a copy of private confidential tax records?

                                      Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public. Isn't that technically something that anyone here that worries about Information Security have a big issue with?????

                                      There is a lot of assumption in that. First of all, this is NOT private information, it's public information for national security. I'm concerned that anyone is allowed to run this country without this being public, in fact, it's essentially treason. Anyone doing so without showing that they are eligible for office, isn't actually eligible for office.

                                      Not according to this.

                                      https://tax.findlaw.com/federal-taxes/tax-return-confidentiality-and-disclosure-laws.html

                                      scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                                        last edited by

                                        @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        @mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                        Donald Trump 'paid $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017' - NY Times

                                        Donald Trump paid just $750 (£580) in federal income tax both in 2016, the year he ran for the US presidency, and in his first year in the White House, the New York Times says.
                                        The newspaper - which says it obtained tax records for Mr Trump and his companies over two decades - also says that he paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years. The records reveal "chronic losses and years of tax avoidance", it says. Mr Trump called the report "fake news". "Actually I paid tax. And you'll see that as soon as my tax returns - it's under audit, they've been under audit for a long time," he told reporters after the story was published on Sunday. "The IRS [Internal Revenue Service] does not treat me well… they treat me very badly," he said.

                                        Ummm... Shouldn't the question be how did the NY Times obtain a copy of private confidential tax records?

                                        Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public. Isn't that technically something that anyone here that worries about Information Security have a big issue with?????

                                        There is a lot of assumption in that. First of all, this is NOT private information, it's public information for national security. I'm concerned that anyone is allowed to run this country without this being public, in fact, it's essentially treason. Anyone doing so without showing that they are eligible for office, isn't actually eligible for office.

                                        Not according to this.

                                        https://tax.findlaw.com/federal-taxes/tax-return-confidentiality-and-disclosure-laws.html

                                        I'm not sure how any of that applies. That the IRS can't disclose your taxes is what that is talking about, not that people you have shared them with cannot. Unless you are implying that the IRS is who published them, and I assure you that they did not, I don't know what you are trying to point to. Once the IRS has returned your taxes to you, the confidentiality of the information is on you to protect.

                                        This is true of all your private information. That something is private under certain conditions changes under many conditions - the biggest one being when you yourself disclose it.

                                        pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • pmonchoP
                                          pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                          @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                          Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public.

                                          Are we concerned that the information is partial? Yes. Whose fault is that? Blame the people forcing it to be partial, not the people informing the public.

                                          Absolutely we are concerned that its partial. It's plain crappy journalism. Although journalism from NY Times is like news from CNN (yeah, that's just an opinion).

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                                            last edited by

                                            @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            @pmoncho said in Non-IT News Thread:

                                            Then the NY Times puts out partial information to the public.

                                            Are we concerned that the information is partial? Yes. Whose fault is that? Blame the people forcing it to be partial, not the people informing the public.

                                            Absolutely we are concerned that its partial. It's plain crappy journalism.

                                            How does that make it crappy? One moment you are questioning how they got what they got, now you are complaining that they didn't get enough. Can't have it both ways. Either it's absolutely amazing journalism as they are the only ones who managed to get it at all. Or it's crappy that they released anything. Can't be crappy because they only got so much, as it's the best out there.

                                            Any "crappy" from "partial" is from one of two sources.... the tax payer himself who hasn't made public what should be; or the rest of the government from allowing it to ever have even temporarily remained secret and not having an automated publishing system for elected official's records.

                                            pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 528
                                            • 529
                                            • 530
                                            • 531
                                            • 532
                                            • 560
                                            • 561
                                            • 530 / 561
                                            • First post
                                              Last post