ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kari's Law and Special SMB Onus on IT Staff

    IT Discussion
    pbx voip telephony karis law
    2
    6
    902
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      MTLS Roles and Responsibilities

      The order imposes pre-configuration requirements on MLTS manufacturers, importers, sellers, and lessors, and configuration requirements on MLTS installers, operators, and managers. The order further clarifies that MLTS managers and operators have the right to rely on enterprise customers to gather, preserve, and update location information.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        A specific punishment for the SMB. Enterprise customers can be forced to update information in their systems. But smaller shops, like the SMB or SME, seem that they can hide that information from the MLTS operator and demand that they figure it out on their own.

        DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Kari's Law and Special SMB Onus on IT Staff:

          A specific punishment for the SMB

          Do you really see that as a punishment?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @DustinB3403 said in Kari's Law and Special SMB Onus on IT Staff:

            @scottalanmiller said in Kari's Law and Special SMB Onus on IT Staff:

            A specific punishment for the SMB

            Do you really see that as a punishment?

            Yes, that SMB providers are expected to have to update information that they don't necessarily have or control is a big deal. Especially when enterprise providers with tons more resources aren't expected to do the same. Basically, the rich get a free pass, and the struggling SMB gets a punishment just for being small.

            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller You just said that Enterprise customers can be forced to update their information, but smaller orgs get a pass.

              I must be misreading what you've typed.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @DustinB3403 said in Kari's Law and Special SMB Onus on IT Staff:

                @scottalanmiller You just said that Enterprise customers can be forced to update their information, but smaller orgs get a pass.

                I must be misreading what you've typed.

                Yes, the CUSTOMERS get a pass, IT that supports small customers has to provide the information that they don't have control over. Enterprise customers have to provide the information from the company.

                SMB customers get to not tell anyone when changes are made and blame someone with no power or way to get that information for certain.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post