ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Oxide

    News
    servers
    7
    15
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • warren.stanleyW
      warren.stanley
      last edited by

      If anyone follows Jessie Frazelle (@jessfraz) they may have seen a post regarding a venture she's involved in. It's a little scant on details, but I'll grab straight from the website

      49b85ed4-1fce-4356-b3a3-6a30db33cca2-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Seems to be lacking a bit in the way of info. Like... what is it?

        warren.stanleyW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • nadnerBN
          nadnerB
          last edited by

          Hmmm, looks like fairy floss (cotton candy). All fluff, no stuff.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • warren.stanleyW
            warren.stanley @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller there's a bit of a rabbit hole to tumble down on this. The topics Jessie posts tend to be Security and Open-Source oriented with interesting, but not limited to, views on the BMC and IPMI tech we regularly use. I've started reading through the back catalog posts of the other people involved to see if i can get a handle on what they're aiming at.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @warren.stanley
              last edited by

              @warren-stanley said in Oxide:

              @scottalanmiller there's a bit of a rabbit hole to tumble down on this. The topics Jessie posts tend to be Security and Open-Source oriented with interesting, but not limited to, views on the BMC and IPMI tech we regularly use. I've started reading through the back catalog posts of the other people involved to see if i can get a handle on what they're aiming at.

              Yeah, the problem there is like me... I "tend to talk" about certain things. But then my commercial projects are often unrelated. People are constantly confused by what I'm working on because they tend to see one thing that I talk about and think that that is what (and probably all) that I do. Then they think that that implies that everything else that I do is related to that thing.

              This might be nothing to do with security, open source, IPMI, etc. Or it might totally be. The site says... nothing at all. I'm not even sure of the fundamentals like... do they plan to manufacture something?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1
                1337
                last edited by 1337

                Well, it says what it is, kind of.

                Rack-scale design (RSD) is a way to build dynamic, software designed datacenters. Intel is behind it with partners like HPE, Dell, Supermicro etc building hardware for it. It's an architecture aimed at hyperscale datacenters with the purpose of higher resource utilization and lower cost.

                It's not just hardware but software as well. Basically you want to disaggregate everything - cpu, memory , storage, network, accelerators. And being able to upgrade and scale this independently. The buzz word for it is Composable disaggregated infrastructure (CDI). It looks like it's a blade architecture when you get into details but it looks like the smallest building block would be a rack.

                They (Oxide) says they are bringing this technology to on-prem for everyone. So I assume they are making it more accessible and more turnkey. Considering how many people and resources are required for hardware, I say they are doing software only.

                Look for Intel RSD to find more info.

                Dell's DSS-9000
                https://www.storagereview.com/dell_emc_dss_9000_rack_scale_infrastructure_announced
                alt text

                warren.stanleyW travisdh1T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • warren.stanleyW
                  warren.stanley @1337
                  last edited by

                  @Pete-S I'm really hoping that the on-prem for "everybody" is implying scaling down to a very small size

                  scottalanmillerS 1 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @warren.stanley
                    last edited by

                    @warren-stanley said in Oxide:

                    @Pete-S I'm really hoping that the on-prem for "everybody" is implying scaling down to a very small size

                    If you scale it down, does it stop being Rack Scale, though?

                    warren.stanleyW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • travisdh1T
                      travisdh1 @1337
                      last edited by

                      @Pete-S said in Oxide:

                      Well, it says what it is, kind of.

                      Rack-scale design (RSD) is a way to build dynamic, software designed datacenters. Intel is behind it with partners like HPE, Dell, Supermicro etc building hardware for it. It's an architecture aimed at hyperscale datacenters with the purpose of higher resource utilization and lower cost.

                      It's not just hardware but software as well. Basically you want to disaggregate everything - cpu, memory , storage, network, accelerators. And being able to upgrade and scale this independently. The buzz word for it is Composable disaggregated infrastructure (CDI). It looks like it's a blade architecture when you get into details but it looks like the smallest building block would be a rack.

                      They (Oxide) says they are bringing this technology to on-prem for everyone. So I assume they are making it more accessible and more turnkey. Considering how many people and resources are required for hardware, I say they are doing software only.

                      Look for Intel RSD to find more info.

                      Dell's DSS-9000
                      https://www.storagereview.com/dell_emc_dss_9000_rack_scale_infrastructure_announced
                      alt text

                      Sounds a lot like the SGI servers from the late 90s.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • warren.stanleyW
                        warren.stanley @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Oxide:

                        @warren-stanley said in Oxide:

                        @Pete-S I'm really hoping that the on-prem for "everybody" is implying scaling down to a very small size

                        If you scale it down, does it stop being Rack Scale, though?

                        I can imagine a pretty small rack ☺

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                          1337 @warren.stanley
                          last edited by 1337

                          @warren-stanley said in Oxide:

                          @Pete-S I'm really hoping that the on-prem for "everybody" is implying scaling down to a very small size

                          A hyperscale datacenter is by definition at the very minimum 5000 servers. So a single rack is indeed everything scaled down to a very, very, tiny small size.

                          If you can run your entire workload on just a handful of hosts...you're probably not "everybody".

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @1337
                            last edited by

                            @Pete-S said in Oxide:

                            If you can run your entire workload on just a handful of hosts...you're probably not "everybody".

                            The average company is just one or two servers. Really, if you need more than a handful of hosts, you are already in a decently exclusive category.

                            The problem being "rack scale" and "everybody" are exclusive concepts. I expect that this is trying to bring rack scale ideas to sub-rack scale size, but even so, composable infrastructure is for rather large shops as a starting point.

                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Oxide:

                              @Pete-S said in Oxide:

                              If you can run your entire workload on just a handful of hosts...you're probably not "everybody".

                              The average company is just one or two servers. Really, if you need more than a handful of hosts, you are already in a decently exclusive category.

                              The problem being "rack scale" and "everybody" are exclusive concepts. I expect that this is trying to bring rack scale ideas to sub-rack scale size, but even so, composable infrastructure is for rather large shops as a starting point.

                              LOL - maybe they mean everybody that's a F100.. 😉

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stacksofplatesS
                                stacksofplates
                                last edited by

                                She wrote a post on her blog about it that explains it a little better.

                                https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/born-in-a-garage/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stacksofplatesS
                                  stacksofplates
                                  last edited by stacksofplates

                                  From her past posts, I'm assuming it's going to be something aligning with open compute and taking things like how Facebook designed their racks/servers into account.

                                  Like here:

                                  https://twitter.com/jessfraz/status/1106336080956018689?lang=en

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post