ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Unsolved Managing Fedora 30 with SMB share for 100 users

    IT Discussion
    ad fedora smb share permissions management
    5
    7
    800
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch
      last edited by

      Things are moving towards webdav. but the client is not ready to move their main shared drive to something like Nextcloud and use WebDAV.

      So, I can drop the old Windows 2008R2 server and move it to SMB shares on a NAS easily enough. That is transparent to the users.

      But how can I manage the users and permissions efficiently. Not just me, but typically I give password reset rights to a trusted user at the client.

      Aiming to drop AD entirely.

      travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • travisdh1T
        travisdh1 @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @JaredBusch Do you still want centralized management for users and security groups? A number of options are available of course, but as to which one would be best to use, that's the sticky bit.

        I know Synology has a module that will handle authentication. Not sure if other NAS vendors have the same sort of thing available.

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stacksofplatesS
          stacksofplates
          last edited by

          Short of keeping AD or running something like IdM, you might be stuck with Webmin for non technical people. I'm pretty sure Cockpit doesn't have Samba integration yet.

          ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @travisdh1
            last edited by

            @travisdh1 said in Managing Fedora 30 with SMB share for 100 users:

            @JaredBusch Do you still want centralized management for users and security groups? A number of options are available of course, but as to which one would be best to use, that's the sticky bit.

            I know Synology has a module that will handle authentication. Not sure if other NAS vendors have the same sort of thing available.

            They have a Synology with empty bays.

            But eh, not sure I like that idea.

            travisdh1T NashBrydgesN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • travisdh1T
              travisdh1 @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said in Managing Fedora 30 with SMB share for 100 users:

              @travisdh1 said in Managing Fedora 30 with SMB share for 100 users:

              @JaredBusch Do you still want centralized management for users and security groups? A number of options are available of course, but as to which one would be best to use, that's the sticky bit.

              I know Synology has a module that will handle authentication. Not sure if other NAS vendors have the same sort of thing available.

              They have a Synology with empty bays.

              But eh, not sure I like that idea.

              Sounds like you should just forget about even managing all that then.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
              • ObsolesceO
                Obsolesce @stacksofplates
                last edited by

                @stacksofplates said in Managing Fedora 30 with SMB share for 100 users:

                Short of keeping AD or running something like IdM, you might be stuck with Webmin for non technical people. I'm pretty sure Cockpit doesn't have Samba integration yet.

                Yeah I would also go with webmin here for non technical people to easily manage things like that.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • NashBrydgesN
                  NashBrydges @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @JaredBusch I have a couple clients using Synology for their auth needs and it's been working extremely well.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 1 / 1
                  • First post
                    Last post