ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    nasa
    31 Posts 6 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      What's worse, is that it's a joke. It isn't a "grand act", it's a failure that shows the world that America can't operate efficiently or effectively and just throws huge sums at ineffective welfare rather than actually producing something of value. NASA has become a laughing stock as private companies blow their doors off over and over again and as other countries invest less and catch up quickly.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Emad R
        last edited by

        @Emad-R said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

        @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

        @Dashrender said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

        @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

        "They are not meant to be quick, cost efficient, or sustainable. They are symbolic grand acts of a grand nation."*

        Uh what?

        It's exactly what I've said for years... it's nothing more than a big welfare project designed to hide unemployment from the masses.

        wow such statement, but i guess your right in a sense if could be spend else where

        If NASA's job was to produce something, it would be doing the kind of work that SpaceX is doing. Instead, it's job is to be big, slow, and bloated and create unneeded jobs which looks great for presidents who then claim that the unemployment numbers are low, when really it's just hidden in government bloat.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

          What's worse, is that it's a joke. It isn't a "grand act", it's a failure that shows the world that America can't operate efficiently or effectively and just throws huge sums at ineffective welfare rather than actually producing something of value. NASA has become a laughing stock as private companies blow their doors off over and over again and as other countries invest less and catch up quickly.

          Exactly. This is NOT the way we should be wellfaring this country.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch
            last edited by JaredBusch

            While all true NASA is a tiny fraction of the issue on welfare and fake jobs, etc.

            It has also been consistently hobbled by various congresses for decades.

            NASA could not do a good job if it wanted to.

            scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

              NASA could not do a good job if it wanted to.

              Any part of the government could if that was what it was supposed to do. The issue isn't the concept of having a national space agency, it's the reality of what the US has. It's not a space agency with a political problem. It's a political problem with a space agency facade.

              JaredBuschJ Emad RE 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                @JaredBusch said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                NASA could not do a good job if it wanted to.

                Any part of the government could if that was what it was supposed to do. The issue isn't the concept of having a national space agency, it's the reality of what the US has. It's not a space agency with a political problem. It's a political problem with a space agency facade.

                Right

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Emad RE
                  Emad R @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller

                  besides I dont understand the rush of finding aliens and other species , it is not like we get along fine under the same species.

                  Whats the rush of meeting our future oppressors , just come to the middle east.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    @JaredBusch said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                    While all true NASA is a tiny fraction of the issue on welfare and fake jobs, etc.

                    Totally agree. There are way bigger fish to fry. But few have the false glory that NASA does. People generally feel that it would be an impressive job to say that you work for NASA. But if someone says that they work for NASA, I just hear "I'm a tax burden on you, but make a lot of money instead of being forced to live in poverty and look for respectable work like a normal welfare recipient." I find NASA far worse than normal welfare, because it's trying to make those unemployable look better than the actual workers earning the money to pay their welfare checks. Glorifying welfare recipients above the workers is a horrible thing. Working at NASA should be a mark of shame, not pride (and to be, it definitely is.)

                    Everyone needs work, that's fine. But no one needs work setting America's tax dollars on fire like our economy is a big joke.

                    In the old days, we could at least make the argument that NASA had a role in employing the best and brightest to make sure that they had a place to go, even if their work was largely wasted. It at least kept them from defecting to do more interesting work elsewhere. But today, NASA is bottom rung on a big ladder. Not only do other countries have better space agencies, but even within the US there are several private firms who actually hire the good people. NASA is now just the catch all for those with looser ethics and less marketable skills.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Emad R
                      last edited by

                      @Emad-R said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                      @scottalanmiller

                      besides I dont understand the rush of finding aliens and other species , it is not like we get along fine under the same species.

                      Whats the rush of meeting our future oppressors , just come to the middle east.

                      There is no rush at all. None. That's part of the point. That's what people are told NASA is trying to do, but it's not trying to do anything but waste money. All that discovery stuff is a facade. It's a big job creator and money waster, it's not about exploration or research.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • pmonchoP
                        pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller

                        But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                          last edited by

                          @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                          @scottalanmiller

                          But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                          NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                          pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • pmonchoP
                            pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                            @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                            @scottalanmiller

                            But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                            NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                            Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                              last edited by

                              @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                              @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                              @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                              @scottalanmiller

                              But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                              NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                              Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                              Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                              JaredBuschJ pmonchoP scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • JaredBuschJ
                                JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by JaredBusch

                                @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                @scottalanmiller

                                But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                Right. Almost everything is contracted.

                                Contracted for NASA, so they get the rights. but they themselves did not do it.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • pmonchoP
                                  pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                  @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                  @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                  @scottalanmiller

                                  But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                  NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                  Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                  Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                  Based on a couple other things I just read, it looks like NASA had the idea and then farmed it out. Either way, still used NASA dollars.

                                  IRJI scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                    @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                    @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                    @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                    @scottalanmiller

                                    But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                    NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                    Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                    Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                    Oh wait, maybe I assumed something in the wording that was wrong. Maybe they didn't mean a contract firm, but a person that was contracting.

                                    pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • IRJI
                                      IRJ @pmoncho
                                      last edited by

                                      @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                      @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                      @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                      @scottalanmiller

                                      But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                      NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                      Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                      Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                      Based on a couple other things I just read, it looks like NASA had the idea and then farmed it out. Either way, still used NASA dollars.

                                      $50 billion for memory foam... Yay

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                                        last edited by

                                        @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                        @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                        @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                        @scottalanmiller

                                        But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                        NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                        Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                        Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                        Based on a couple other things I just read, it looks like NASA had the idea and then farmed it out. Either way, still used NASA dollars.

                                        NASA dollars is just another way to say "US tax dollars". If NASA doesn't do the work themselves, they didn't do it.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • pmonchoP
                                          pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                          @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                          @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                          @scottalanmiller

                                          But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                          NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                          Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                          Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                          Oh wait, maybe I assumed something in the wording that was wrong. Maybe they didn't mean a contract firm, but a person that was contracting.

                                          Either way. It still came from the public's pocket.

                                          DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @pmoncho
                                            last edited by

                                            @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                            @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                            @pmoncho said in After nearly $50 billion, NASA’s deep-space plans remain grounded:

                                            @scottalanmiller

                                            But we need our Memory Foam and a few other expensive inventions . Ugh

                                            NASA didn't invent that, though. NASA paid for it, but a private firm that does actual research invented it. That kind of stuff I'm okay with, but we can do all of that without NASA wasting resources in the middle.

                                            Howstuffworks states its a NASA invention.

                                            Wikipedia says that it was a NASA Ames contractor that did it.

                                            Oh wait, maybe I assumed something in the wording that was wrong. Maybe they didn't mean a contract firm, but a person that was contracting.

                                            Either way. It still came from the public's pocket.

                                            But if it came from NASA - at least you could say they made something.

                                            scottalanmillerS pmonchoP 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post