ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead

    News
    comcast isp ars technica
    9
    31
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @DustinB3403
      last edited by

      @DustinB3403 said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

      In Rochester we don't have those kinds of outages. Maybe it's because we're a much smaller city or because our infrastructure is better maintained

      I'd refuse to pay for service like that.

      In most places - if you refuse to pay for service like that, then you simply have no service at all.

      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

        @DustinB3403 said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

        In Rochester we don't have those kinds of outages. Maybe it's because we're a much smaller city or because our infrastructure is better maintained

        I'd refuse to pay for service like that.

        In most places - if you refuse to pay for service like that, then you simply have no service at all.

        Sad but true.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DonahueD
          Donahue
          last edited by

          We are lucky. We pay $90 for gig symmetrical at our HQ. The branch is like $300 for 1000/500

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • pmonchoP
            pmoncho
            last edited by

            Where I'm at, you pay $49 for ATT DSL 7.5 down (that is it) or $90 to Spectrum for 100Mb down.

            I am in a suburb in OH but I live on a dead end street of a main street. 400 yards away ATT Fiber Uverse with 10/100 for $79. They won't run down my street at all.

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @pmoncho
              last edited by

              @pmoncho said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

              Where I'm at, you pay $49 for ATT DSL 7.5 down (that is it) or $90 to Spectrum for 100Mb down.

              I am in a suburb in OH but I live on a dead end street of a main street. 400 yards away ATT Fiber Uverse with 10/100 for $79. They won't run down my street at all.

              make a deal with someone close by to install to their premise and use Ubiquiti gear to send it to your house.

              pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • pmonchoP
                pmoncho @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                @pmoncho said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                Where I'm at, you pay $49 for ATT DSL 7.5 down (that is it) or $90 to Spectrum for 100Mb down.

                I am in a suburb in OH but I live on a dead end street of a main street. 400 yards away ATT Fiber Uverse with 10/100 for $79. They won't run down my street at all.

                make a deal with someone close by to install to their premise and use Ubiquiti gear to send it to your house.

                That would be nice wouldn't. Just need to cut down some dense 100' Oak and Maple trees too.

                Although, I could use another friend. 🙂

                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @pmoncho
                  last edited by

                  @pmoncho said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                  @JaredBusch said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                  @pmoncho said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                  Where I'm at, you pay $49 for ATT DSL 7.5 down (that is it) or $90 to Spectrum for 100Mb down.

                  I am in a suburb in OH but I live on a dead end street of a main street. 400 yards away ATT Fiber Uverse with 10/100 for $79. They won't run down my street at all.

                  make a deal with someone close by to install to their premise and use Ubiquiti gear to send it to your house.

                  That would be nice wouldn't. Just need to cut down some dense 100' Oak and Maple trees too.

                  Although, I could use another friend. 🙂

                  zero line of sight at all?

                  pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • pmonchoP
                    pmoncho @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                    @pmoncho said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                    @JaredBusch said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                    @pmoncho said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                    Where I'm at, you pay $49 for ATT DSL 7.5 down (that is it) or $90 to Spectrum for 100Mb down.

                    I am in a suburb in OH but I live on a dead end street of a main street. 400 yards away ATT Fiber Uverse with 10/100 for $79. They won't run down my street at all.

                    make a deal with someone close by to install to their premise and use Ubiquiti gear to send it to your house.

                    That would be nice wouldn't. Just need to cut down some dense 100' Oak and Maple trees too.

                    Although, I could use another friend. 🙂

                    zero line of sight at all?

                    Correct. I just don't know if I could put up a 30' pole on their home and mine to get a line of sight.

                    Trust me, it is really f***ing annoying around here. The only solution is to move but that won't happen anytime soon.

                    ATT and DirectTV came around recently and I seen my neighbors switch over. Then they realized how crappy ATT DSL was and how the Dish's hard a hard time getting a signal through the trees on a windy day. Needless to say, all 8 of them switched back to Spectrum.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Reid CooperR
                      Reid Cooper
                      last edited by

                      Four hundred yards isn't all that far. Might be worth a small investment in equipment to see if it could cut through some dense foliage.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch
                        last edited by JaredBusch

                        Just had this email exchange today with Adams Telecom.
                        Note: The existing service was 50/50 with a 3 year contract at $80. Contract expired this month.

                        This is what happens when small municipalities are ignored. They work with local telecoms or do it themselves. Ans the costs are always better.
                        7196f10d-76e5-4d04-8b10-8e0b9aec0318-image.png

                        pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • pmonchoP
                          pmoncho @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @JaredBusch said in Comcast rejected by small town—residents vote for municipal fiber instead:

                          Just had this email exchange today with Adams Telecom.
                          Note: The existing service was 50/50 with a 3 year contract at $80. Contract expired this month.

                          This is what happens when small municipalities are ignored. They work with local telecoms or do it themselves. Ans the costs are always better.
                          7196f10d-76e5-4d04-8b10-8e0b9aec0318-image.png

                          Must be F'ng NICE! B#&%@ 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 2 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post