Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date
- 
 Very helpful, thanks! 
- 
 If there are no updates to install, do you still get an e-mail reporting this? Or only if there are updates installed? 
- 
 Nice guide, does this also work on the downstream forks of Fedora? 
- 
 @dustinb3403 said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: Nice guide, does this also work on the downstream forks of Fedora? As long as they use the standard DNF packages, yes. 
- 
 @brrabill said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: If there are no updates to install, do you still get an e-mail reporting this? Or only if there are updates installed? So, everything was set up properly, apparently. Because I just ran it manually again and received an e-mail. Have to get used to Linux, where if it doesn't say anything, it worked! 
- 
 @brrabill said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: If there are no updates to install, do you still get an e-mail reporting this? Or only if there are updates installed? No, only when it does something. 
- 
 As others have said, but never hurts to repeat ... great writeup. 
- 
 Guide updated to reflect timer name change back to original. 
- 
 I'm surprised this isn't a default setting. 
- 
 After upgrading to Fedora 29, my system was not updating regularly. Looking at systemctl list-timers --allI could see the timer was there but not scheduled to run.I have no idea what broke, because after researching, I found that they reintroduced the original naming, but the specific timers should have still been functioning. Whatever. I removed the -installand started the original.systemctl stop dnf-automatic-install.timer systemctl disable dnf-automatic-install.timer systemctl enable --now dnf-automatic.timer
- 
 @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: I'm surprised this isn't a default setting. Or at least provide an option during installation. @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: After upgrading to Fedora 29, my system was not updating regularly. Looking at systemctl list-timers --allI could see the timer was there but not scheduled to run.I have no idea what broke, because after researhcing, I found that they reintroduced the original nameing, but the specific timers should have still been functioning. Whatever. I removed the -installand started the original.systemctl stop dnf-automatic-install.timer systemctl disable dnf-automatic-install.timer systemctl enable --now dnf-automatic.timerYep, I was also experience the same thing too. 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: I'm surprised this isn't a default setting. Default for who or what? If you install Fedora 29 + Cinnamon desktop, there is a GUI updater installed by default. 
- 
 @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: I'm surprised this isn't a default setting. Defualt for who or what? If you install Fedora 29 + Cinnamon desktop, there is a GUI updater installed by default. In this day and age - I more expect things to autoupdate themselves for consumers... of course Fedora... so it is really a consumer thing? Is there a difference between client and server? I think we've had that conversation before.. though I don't recall the exact output. Now I'm ready for your impending /FFS 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: Now I'm ready for your impending /FFS :face_with_stuck-out_tongue: @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: In this day and age - I more expect things to autoupdate themselves for consumers... of course Fedora... so it is really a consumer thing? I just said there was something installed by default on Desktop. Not this, but something. @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: Is there a difference between client and server? I think we've had that conversation before.. though I don't recall the exact output. There is no difference. It is all in the initial install choices you make. The desktop ISO has a different installer I believe. But that doesn't change the underpinning. 
- 
 @Dashrender now to address auto updates for server. That also comes down to how you install. I always, 100% of the time, start from the NetInstall ISO and choose the Minimal option during install. That means there isn't jack shit setup by default. I honestly have no idea what any of the other options install. 
- 
 @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender now to address auto updates for server. That also comes down to how you install. I always, 100% of the time, start from the NetInstall ISO and choose the Minimal option during install. That means there isn't jack shit setup by default. I honestly have no idea what any of the other options install. I wouldn't expect you to auto install updates on Server... and my expectation is only for workstations.. and since Linux OSes don't really truly have a difference, then I guess a default type setting on it is not likely... of course, as you said - it could be one of the options you mentioned.. 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender now to address auto updates for server. That also comes down to how you install. I always, 100% of the time, start from the NetInstall ISO and choose the Minimal option during install. That means there isn't jack shit setup by default. I honestly have no idea what any of the other options install. I wouldn't expect you to auto install updates on Server... and my expectation is only for workstations.. and since Linux OSes don't really truly have a difference, then I guess a default type setting on it is not likely... of course, as you said - it could be one of the options you mentioned.. FFS The Cinnamon desktop install DOES.. I said this many times... 
- 
 @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender now to address auto updates for server. That also comes down to how you install. I always, 100% of the time, start from the NetInstall ISO and choose the Minimal option during install. That means there isn't jack shit setup by default. I honestly have no idea what any of the other options install. I wouldn't expect you to auto install updates on Server... and my expectation is only for workstations.. and since Linux OSes don't really truly have a difference, then I guess a default type setting on it is not likely... of course, as you said - it could be one of the options you mentioned.. FFS The Cinnamon desktop install DOES.. I said this many times... I think you mentioned it gives you a GUI, nothing about it automatically setups up auto updates. 
- 
 @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender now to address auto updates for server. That also comes down to how you install. I always, 100% of the time, start from the NetInstall ISO and choose the Minimal option during install. That means there isn't jack shit setup by default. I honestly have no idea what any of the other options install. I wouldn't expect you to auto install updates on Server... What? Why not? I sure would. You'd need a pretty good reason to avoid updates at their most critical spot. 
- 
 @scottalanmiller said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @JaredBusch said in Using dnf-automatic to keep Fedora up to date: @Dashrender now to address auto updates for server. That also comes down to how you install. I always, 100% of the time, start from the NetInstall ISO and choose the Minimal option during install. That means there isn't jack shit setup by default. I honestly have no idea what any of the other options install. I wouldn't expect you to auto install updates on Server... What? Why not? I sure would. You'd need a pretty good reason to avoid updates at their most critical spot. because we use Windows isn't a good reason? 






