What Are You Doing Right Now
-
More PowerShell scripting.
-
On the train home.
-
Apple Watch acquired. 14 days to make my final decision if I want to keep the 42mm or get the 38mm.
-
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Apple Watch acquired. 14 days to make my final decision if I want to keep the 42mm or get the 38mm.
38mm is way too small.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
-
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
-
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
I wasn't fighting it, I was just showing a good change.
-
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
I wasn't fighting it, I was just showing a good change.
No not you, I mean ML. Even if they may not need to, being a US based website... is ML prepared to fight the fight if a US court, or whatever, chooses to try to enforce it?
In a case like that, it's easier to just be compliant than try to fight it.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Apple Watch acquired. 14 days to make my final decision if I want to keep the 42mm or get the 38mm.
38mm is way too small.
Not when you come from a Fitbit Charge 2
-
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
Isn't it already? No one knows, really.
-
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
I wasn't fighting it, I was just showing a good change.
No not you, I mean ML. Even if they may not need to, being a US based website... is ML prepared to fight the fight if a US court, or whatever, chooses to try to enforce it?
In a case like that, it's easier to just be compliant than try to fight it.
That's true. The bigger questions are, though, what does it take to be compliant? Even EU companies aren't sure. US ones have even murkier time. No one has defined clearly any part of it. Does it apply to any website? Any business? Only those that are "data processors"? Those are all questions being asked. We have the problem that since we are not an official data processor, we have no official means of linking data to a person, it's all anonymous. So there is no means for someone to pursue GDPR requests as no associated personal data exists.
-
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
That link seems to only be on the mobile pages?
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
That link seems to only be on the mobile pages?
I did that on my desktop.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
That link seems to only be on the mobile pages?
-
@scottalanmiller So the link would be
https://mangolassi.it/user/username/consent -
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller So the link would be
https://mangolassi.it/user/username/consentI see it now, thanks.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
I wasn't fighting it, I was just showing a good change.
No not you, I mean ML. Even if they may not need to, being a US based website... is ML prepared to fight the fight if a US court, or whatever, chooses to try to enforce it?
In a case like that, it's easier to just be compliant than try to fight it.
That's true. The bigger questions are, though, what does it take to be compliant? Even EU companies aren't sure. US ones have even murkier time. No one has defined clearly any part of it. Does it apply to any website? Any business? Only those that are "data processors"? Those are all questions being asked. We have the problem that since we are not an official data processor, we have no official means of linking data to a person, it's all anonymous. So there is no means for someone to pursue GDPR requests as no associated personal data exists.
Not everyone has those questions. You do. This has been covered extensively. The only way ML is going to avoid GDPR is by retaining zero PII.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
I wasn't fighting it, I was just showing a good change.
No not you, I mean ML. Even if they may not need to, being a US based website... is ML prepared to fight the fight if a US court, or whatever, chooses to try to enforce it?
In a case like that, it's easier to just be compliant than try to fight it.
That's true. The bigger questions are, though, what does it take to be compliant? Even EU companies aren't sure. US ones have even murkier time. No one has defined clearly any part of it. Does it apply to any website? Any business? Only those that are "data processors"? Those are all questions being asked. We have the problem that since we are not an official data processor, we have no official means of linking data to a person, it's all anonymous. So there is no means for someone to pursue GDPR requests as no associated personal data exists.
It seems that most companies are sure... I've received 100's of policy update emails, you've seen the memes, that say what they are doing to be compliant. It's interesting to look at a privacy policy before and after, which really can highlight what they needed to modify or implement to become compliant.
And lawyers, I'm sure they pay a lot of money for that too.
-
@kelly said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dbeato where is that?
under your profile name and press the three dots you will see as below:
Is ML going to be GDPR compliant?
Probably a good idea, I wouldn't want to fight that fight regardless.
I wasn't fighting it, I was just showing a good change.
No not you, I mean ML. Even if they may not need to, being a US based website... is ML prepared to fight the fight if a US court, or whatever, chooses to try to enforce it?
In a case like that, it's easier to just be compliant than try to fight it.
That's true. The bigger questions are, though, what does it take to be compliant? Even EU companies aren't sure. US ones have even murkier time. No one has defined clearly any part of it. Does it apply to any website? Any business? Only those that are "data processors"? Those are all questions being asked. We have the problem that since we are not an official data processor, we have no official means of linking data to a person, it's all anonymous. So there is no means for someone to pursue GDPR requests as no associated personal data exists.
Not everyone has those questions. You do. This has been covered extensively. The only way ML is going to avoid GDPR is by retaining zero PII.
Everyone has those question. Some people might pretend not to. But if you search, the only people who are "sure" are those selling services.
-
And of those that say that they are sure... half claim that there is no way it applies, and half say it definitely applies. Clearly "sure" is the one thing we know doesn't apply.
We also have the very difficult problem of what is PII in this case? AFAIK, there is no PII involved. Because we don't have any idea who people are. But some people think it is PII, so even once you say having PII means you are covered, it isn't clear that there is PII.
