ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Phones

    IT Discussion
    9
    27
    1.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jmooreJ
      jmoore
      last edited by

      Is there a general consensus for brand here over what phones are the best value for 20 or less users in a PBX setup?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • EddieJenningsE
        EddieJennings
        last edited by

        I've been pleased with testing Yealink and I'll be deploying the Yealink T42S phones to my company soon.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender
          last edited by

          And I’ve been deploying the T46s lately

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch
            last edited by

            My personal order of preference is

            1. Yealink
            2. Sangoma
            3. Grandstream
            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee
              last edited by

              I always try to make my choice of phones depending on the PBX.

              For example, if I was deploying a Grandstream UCM, I would use GS phones.
              If I'm doing 3CX, I'd use Yealink phones.

              I'm assuming FreePBX has "tighter" integration with Sangoma or Yealink phones?

              JaredBuschJ coliverC EddieJenningsE 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                I always try to make my choice of phones depending on the PBX.

                That is just silly.

                FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • coliverC
                  coliver @FATeknollogee
                  last edited by

                  @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                  I'm assuming FreePBX has "tighter" integration with Sangoma or Yealink phones?

                  Why would you assume that? FreePBX is SIP and supports SIP phones this assumption really doesn't make sense in this instance.

                  FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @coliver
                    last edited by

                    @coliver said in Phones:

                    @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                    I'm assuming FreePBX has "tighter" integration with Sangoma or Yealink phones?

                    Why would you assume that? FreePBX is SIP and supports SIP phones this assumption really doesn't make sense in this instance.

                    I said "assume" because I've never used FreePBX!

                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • FATeknollogeeF
                      FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @jaredbusch said in Phones:

                      @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                      I always try to make my choice of phones depending on the PBX.

                      That is just silly.

                      If I may ask, why is that silly?

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                        @jaredbusch said in Phones:

                        @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                        I always try to make my choice of phones depending on the PBX.

                        That is just silly.

                        If I may ask, why is that silly?

                        Because SIP is SIP. You buy the phones that have the features you need with the quality you need, for the price you need.

                        The PBX has nothing to do with it.

                        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @FATeknollogee
                          last edited by

                          @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                          @coliver said in Phones:

                          @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                          I'm assuming FreePBX has "tighter" integration with Sangoma or Yealink phones?

                          Why would you assume that? FreePBX is SIP and supports SIP phones this assumption really doesn't make sense in this instance.

                          I said "assume" because I've never used FreePBX!

                          Right, which is why the assumption doesn't make sense. Why would a SIP based platform be better with one phone then the other?

                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • FATeknollogeeF
                            FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @jaredbusch said in Phones:

                            @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                            @jaredbusch said in Phones:

                            @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                            I always try to make my choice of phones depending on the PBX.

                            That is just silly.

                            If I may ask, why is that silly?

                            Because SIP is SIP. You buy the phones that have the features you need with the quality you need, for the price you need.

                            The PBX has nothing to do with it.

                            I guess you haven't deployed a UCM6xxx?
                            Will any SIP phone work on the UCM, yes, because SIP is SIP is SIP.
                            Will the UCM auto-discover/configure Grandstream products, you bet!
                            Is that a form of "lock-in" since the UCM plays "nice" (or nicer) with other Grandstream products...it is what it is

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @coliver
                              last edited by

                              @coliver said in Phones:

                              @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                              @coliver said in Phones:

                              @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                              I'm assuming FreePBX has "tighter" integration with Sangoma or Yealink phones?

                              Why would you assume that? FreePBX is SIP and supports SIP phones this assumption really doesn't make sense in this instance.

                              I said "assume" because I've never used FreePBX!

                              Right, which is why the assumption doesn't make sense. Why would a SIP based platform be better with one phone then the other?

                              FreePBX lets you use their paid Endpoint Manager module for free with Sangoma phones. But that is it. I do not use it anyway, so there is that. The benefit for the Endpoint Manager is quite small IMO.

                              3CX is the same. If you use a phone on their list you get magic provisioning things. But again, this is stuff that is really not relevant. It does make things "easier" for a layman, but not for a dedicated PBX Admin.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • EddieJenningsE
                                EddieJennings @FATeknollogee
                                last edited by

                                @fateknollogee said in Phones:

                                I always try to make my choice of phones depending on the PBX.

                                Sounds like you're a slave to Altigen as I am at the moment. Soon my chains will be broken!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • AdamFA
                                  AdamF
                                  last edited by

                                  Grandstream and Yealink are both great. Polycoms are good also, but are way over priced in today's market. I only use PolyCom for Conference phones.

                                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403 @AdamF
                                    last edited by

                                    @fuznutz04 said in Phones:

                                    Grandstream and Yealink are both great. Polycoms are good also, but are way over priced in today's market. I only use PolyCom for Conference phones.

                                    Have you seen the new Yealink CP960 phones. Those things are pretty niffty. . . and very well priced when compared to polycom's comparable models.

                                    AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AdamFA
                                      AdamF @DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      @dustinb3403 said in Phones:

                                      @fuznutz04 said in Phones:

                                      Grandstream and Yealink are both great. Polycoms are good also, but are way over priced in today's market. I only use PolyCom for Conference phones.

                                      Have you seen the new Yealink CP960 phones. Those things are pretty niffty. . . and very well priced when compared to polycom's comparable models.

                                      Yes, I saw those. I'd like to get one to try it out. Those run Android. The last Android based desktop phone I tried (a Ubiquiti phone) was totally useless. It was purely eye candy. However, I'm not blaming that on Android.

                                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403 @AdamF
                                        last edited by

                                        @fuznutz04 said in Phones:

                                        @dustinb3403 said in Phones:

                                        @fuznutz04 said in Phones:

                                        Grandstream and Yealink are both great. Polycoms are good also, but are way over priced in today's market. I only use PolyCom for Conference phones.

                                        Have you seen the new Yealink CP960 phones. Those things are pretty niffty. . . and very well priced when compared to polycom's comparable models.

                                        Yes, I saw those. I'd like to get one to try it out. Those run Android. The last Android based desktop phone I tried (a Ubiquiti phone) was totally useless. It was purely eye candy. However, I'm not blaming that on Android.

                                        Don't the Polycom Trio line also use an Android OS?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jmooreJ
                                          jmoore
                                          last edited by

                                          Ok thanks for the info everyone. Seems Yealink is the consensus here. Ill see what meets the budget. Also learned a bit from the other discussions lol. Interesting how that works

                                          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DustinB3403D
                                            DustinB3403 @jmoore
                                            last edited by

                                            @jmoore said in Phones:

                                            Ok thanks for the info everyone. Seems Yealink is the consensus here. Ill see what meets the budget. Also learned a bit from the other discussions lol. Interesting how that works

                                            Yealink has a wide range of devices, so make sure you're considering what is required in terms of functionality. Before you start asking for a budget.

                                            jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post