What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Cleaning and putting the house back together landlord's showing the house tomorrow to potential tenants
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@fuznutz04 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Dealing with Comcast issues.
A fire in NYC melted a major fiber line and is effecting internet on the east coast. Fun fun! http://downdetector.com/status/comcast-xfinity/lancaster
Again. No redundancies at all?
For Comcast? Ha.
They are "rerouting traffic" in the mean time... or so the rumors say.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Of course they value their employees...
I've definitely, as a C level advisor, talked to companies that were extremely clear in that they did NOT value their employees and viewed them as a drain on resources but felt compelled to keep them employed.
Burger King?
-
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Of course they value their employees...
I've definitely, as a C level advisor, talked to companies that were extremely clear in that they did NOT value their employees and viewed them as a drain on resources but felt compelled to keep them employed.
Burger King?
Large marketing firm.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Of course they value their employees...
I've definitely, as a C level advisor, talked to companies that were extremely clear in that they did NOT value their employees and viewed them as a drain on resources but felt compelled to keep them employed.
Wow. That is kind of blunt. Do C-levels think that they can do better by themselves without the help of a workforce? Just think of the number of hours they would have to spend doing each individuals position just to keep the business running.
Yes, they said that they would not pay for working computers for their staff because the faster that people could "work", the faster that the company would lose money. They felt that much of their staff actively hurt the company by coming to work and that they did nothing useful.
Then why keep the unproductive / unuseful staff around collecting a paycheck?
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Of course they value their employees...
I've definitely, as a C level advisor, talked to companies that were extremely clear in that they did NOT value their employees and viewed them as a drain on resources but felt compelled to keep them employed.
Wow. That is kind of blunt. Do C-levels think that they can do better by themselves without the help of a workforce? Just think of the number of hours they would have to spend doing each individuals position just to keep the business running.
Yes, they said that they would not pay for working computers for their staff because the faster that people could "work", the faster that the company would lose money. They felt that much of their staff actively hurt the company by coming to work and that they did nothing useful.
and they kept them why?
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Of course they value their employees...
I've definitely, as a C level advisor, talked to companies that were extremely clear in that they did NOT value their employees and viewed them as a drain on resources but felt compelled to keep them employed.
Wow. That is kind of blunt. Do C-levels think that they can do better by themselves without the help of a workforce? Just think of the number of hours they would have to spend doing each individuals position just to keep the business running.
Yes, they said that they would not pay for working computers for their staff because the faster that people could "work", the faster that the company would lose money. They felt that much of their staff actively hurt the company by coming to work and that they did nothing useful.
Then why keep the unproductive / unuseful staff around collecting a paycheck?
Exactly - at least with BK, they told you they felt that they where a form of welfare for people.. what was the Marketing Firm's excuse?
-
@dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@nerdydad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@dashrender said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Of course they value their employees...
I've definitely, as a C level advisor, talked to companies that were extremely clear in that they did NOT value their employees and viewed them as a drain on resources but felt compelled to keep them employed.
Wow. That is kind of blunt. Do C-levels think that they can do better by themselves without the help of a workforce? Just think of the number of hours they would have to spend doing each individuals position just to keep the business running.
Yes, they said that they would not pay for working computers for their staff because the faster that people could "work", the faster that the company would lose money. They felt that much of their staff actively hurt the company by coming to work and that they did nothing useful.
Then why keep the unproductive / unuseful staff around collecting a paycheck?
Felt compelled to not fire them, it's amazing how many jobs exists because companies feel that they owe it to people.
-
-
And internet is back. UNMS reports outages nicely.
-
@donaldlandru said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
And internet is back. UNMS reports outages nicely.
Damn you were down for 13 hours?!
-
Yes, but given I wouldn't want to climb a 350' tower in a thunderstorm, I don't expect my ISP to either.
-
@donaldlandru said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Yes, but given I wouldn't want to climb a 350' tower in a thunderstorm, I don't expect my ISP to either.
They have grounding equipment for that. .. . put the guy in a faraday suit.
-
@donaldlandru said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Yes, but given I wouldn't want to climb a 350' tower in a thunderstorm, I don't expect my ISP to either.
Slackers
-
Why is the Internet on a watertower?
-
-
@gjacobse said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Pondering the future of IT?
Always
-
And wondering why my wife is still asleep. It's 11am!
-
@dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@donaldlandru said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Yes, but given I wouldn't want to climb a 350' tower in a thunderstorm, I don't expect my ISP to either.
They have grounding equipment for that. .. . put the guy in a faraday suit.
It's not all differences in electrical potential... but the gravity of the wind at that height....
-
@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
And wondering why my wife is still asleep. It's 11am!
She had the con-junk, her body needs some rest!
