ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Are You Doing Right Now

    Water Closet
    time waster
    285
    88.9k
    41.5m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @NerdyDad
      last edited by

      @NerdyDad said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

      Literal excerpt:

      Light Saber
      Sadly, the technology doesn't currently exist to create a real light saber. However, you can pack a toy light saber in your carry-on or checked bag. May the force be with you.

      Little do they know....

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • EddieJenningsE
        EddieJennings
        last edited by

        Reading about SR-IOV

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RojoLocoR
          RojoLoco
          last edited by

          Flight booked for mangocon 2017!!!

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @RojoLoco
            last edited by

            @RojoLoco said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

            Flight booked for mangocon 2017!!!

            Sweet!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              I'm continuously amazed how on SW you can go a month without a specific question then two the same one just minutes apart. It's like nearly all discussions come in waves, but from disconnected people. I don't understand the effect.

              Example is today there are two topics that popped up within ten minutes of each other... both are looking at if connecting iSCSI directly to a VM to bypass the datastore is a wise idea. I've not seen that come up in weeks or months, but two in a few minutes. Chances are, another will happen later today.

              EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • EddieJenningsE
                EddieJennings @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                I'm continuously amazed how on SW you can go a month without a specific question then two the same one just minutes apart. It's like nearly all discussions come in waves, but from disconnected people. I don't understand the effect.

                Example is today there are two topics that popped up within ten minutes of each other... both are looking at if connecting iSCSI directly to a VM to bypass the datastore is a wise idea. I've not seen that come up in weeks or months, but two in a few minutes. Chances are, another will happen later today.

                Link?

                From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.

                I am using iSCSI storage for the VHD that's the "data" drive for a VM that's a file server (among other things). For a couple of days, my iSCSI storage will be used for all of my VHDs while the new local RAID 10 initializes. Then my iSCSI storage will be for backups.

                scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @EddieJennings
                  last edited by

                  @EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                  From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.

                  Exactly, otherwise you break snaps and take visibility out of the hands of the hypervisor.

                  dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    Updated the deployment image at one client.

                    Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.

                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @EddieJennings
                      last edited by

                      @EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                      For a couple of days, my iSCSI storage will be used for all of my VHDs while the new local RAID 10 initializes.

                      Where days = minutes, I hope. What kind of initialization is that?

                      EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                        Updated the deployment image at one client.

                        Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.

                        Alpha still, but barely.
                        0_1496339278570_upload-dcf8d90e-3d8d-43c9-9663-14be4d3f9ecb

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • EddieJenningsE
                          EddieJennings @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          @EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                          For a couple of days, my iSCSI storage will be used for all of my VHDs while the new local RAID 10 initializes.

                          Where days = minutes, I hope. What kind of initialization is that?

                          However long it'll take the PERC710 controller on my Dell T620 to get the new array ready. I hope it's minutes.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                            @JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                            Updated the deployment image at one client.

                            Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.

                            Alpha still, but barely.
                            0_1496339278570_upload-dcf8d90e-3d8d-43c9-9663-14be4d3f9ecb

                            I didn't realize that 26 was so close to production release.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @coliver
                              last edited by

                              @coliver said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                              @JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                              @JaredBusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                              Updated the deployment image at one client.

                              Now setting up a Fedora 26 VM to try this Nginx-Extras on.

                              Alpha still, but barely.
                              0_1496339278570_upload-dcf8d90e-3d8d-43c9-9663-14be4d3f9ecb

                              I didn't realize that 26 was so close to production release.

                              It's only a six month cycle. The next one is never very far away.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • dafyreD
                                dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                @EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.

                                Exactly, otherwise you break snaps and take visibility out of the hands of the hypervisor.

                                Having done things both ways, it's definitely better to let the Hypervisor handle the underlying disks.

                                EddieJenningsE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • EddieJenningsE
                                  EddieJennings @dafyre
                                  last edited by

                                  @dafyre said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                  @EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                  From what I've learned, it seems like the way to utilize iSCSI storage for a VM is to connect the iSCSI storage to the hypervisor and put a VHD on it for the VM to use, rather than trying to connecting iSCSI directly to a VM.

                                  Exactly, otherwise you break snaps and take visibility out of the hands of the hypervisor.

                                  Having done things both ways, it's definitely better to let the Hypervisor handle the underlying disks.

                                  I once did the middle road before I became educated: iSCSI connection to Hypervisor (Hyper-V), then pass-through the disk to VM.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    Why do people get so confused about MS licensing? I mean it's no GPL, but come on. Am I the only one that feels much of it is obvious and what isn't is pretty decently spelled out in the EULA? Someone asked a question, I immediately could tell it was going to be non-viable because it is so obviously going to be a EULA violation and so double checked the EULA and had a clear and concise answer in like 30 seconds.

                                    https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2000182-hyper-v-on-windows-10-for-very-small-firm

                                    Most of the thread I get, people looking for use case clarification and that's totally cool. but then the expected rant by someone that expects something ridiculously unreasonable, claims things are too complicated to be viable and then claims to have answers but clearly doesn't understand the TECH at all... I suppose that's why he doesn't understand the EULA.

                                    wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • wirestyle22W
                                      wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller A lot of the confusion comes from microsoft reps giving you misinformation, which has happened to me at least 4 times now.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                                        last edited by

                                        @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                        @scottalanmiller A lot of the confusion comes from microsoft reps giving you misinformation, which has happened to me at least 4 times now.

                                        Well, to some degree, that's your fault. That's an inappropriate resource for getting licensing advice. Unless they are specifically a licensing advisor that exists for that purpose, it's not their job to tell you and you shouldn't be asking them. They wouldn't be good resources for any technical advice, either, they are reps, not your engineers.

                                        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          Tagging @Chris who can commiserate on that thread 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • wirestyle22W
                                            wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by wirestyle22

                                            @scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                            @wirestyle22 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                            @scottalanmiller A lot of the confusion comes from microsoft reps giving you misinformation, which has happened to me at least 4 times now.

                                            Well, to some degree, that's your fault. That's an inappropriate resource for getting licensing advice. Unless they are specifically a licensing advisor that exists for that purpose, it's not their job to tell you and you shouldn't be asking them. They wouldn't be good resources for any technical advice, either, they are reps, not your engineers.

                                            Agreed, but I wouldn't have the expectation of spiceworks peeps knowing this. I myself didn't a few years ago.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2097
                                            • 2098
                                            • 2099
                                            • 2100
                                            • 2101
                                            • 4443
                                            • 4444
                                            • 2099 / 4444
                                            • First post
                                              Last post